
So you have decided that I do not need your solution, huh? ./O3ch On Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 11:29 AM, Odhiambo Washington <odhiambo@gmail.com> wrote:
Ok3ch,
What I have in mind is a solution that will give some serious saving on bandwidth for those using squid. I need to find out who would be interested in such a solution, one that enables them to free up their bandwidth for other uses:)
With "serious", I mean something around 70% cache hit ratio.
On 9 January 2015 at 12:49, Okechukwu <okechukwu@gmail.com> wrote:
Like I told you, I have a deployment, though its actually an added value for the customers who want it - I have been toying with the idea of implementing WCCP on the router to force it on all of them, but still thats just at it - next question?
./Ok3ch
On Thu, Jan 8, 2015 at 3:18 PM, Odhiambo Washington via skunkworks < skunkworks@lists.my.co.ke> wrote:
Hello Skunks :-)
Are there techies here who actively use Squid cache in their networks?
What sort of deployments do you have?
Transparent/forward or both?
What value does it add to your network, if any?
I am interested in sharing information about efficient deployments - if any of you believe theirs is.
-- Best regards, Odhiambo WASHINGTON, Nairobi,KE +254733744121/+254722743223 "I can't hear you -- I'm using the scrambler."
_______________________________________________ skunkworks mailing list skunkworks@lists.my.co.ke ------------ List info, subscribe/unsubscribe http://lists.my.co.ke/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/skunkworks ------------
Skunkworks Rules http://my.co.ke/phpbb/viewtopic.php?f=24&t=94 ------------ Other services @ http://my.co.ke
-- Best regards, Odhiambo WASHINGTON, Nairobi,KE +254733744121/+254722743223 "I can't hear you -- I'm using the scrambler."