So you have decided that I do not need your solution, huh?

./O3ch

On Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 11:29 AM, Odhiambo Washington <odhiambo@gmail.com> wrote:
Ok3ch,

What I have in mind is a solution that will give some serious saving on bandwidth for those using squid. I need to find out who would be interested in such a solution, one that enables them to free up their bandwidth for other uses:)

With "serious", I mean something around 70% cache hit ratio.


On 9 January 2015 at 12:49, Okechukwu <okechukwu@gmail.com> wrote:
Like I told you, I have a deployment, though its actually an added value for the customers who want it - I have been toying with the idea of implementing WCCP on the router to force it on all of them, but still thats just at it - next question?

./Ok3ch

On Thu, Jan 8, 2015 at 3:18 PM, Odhiambo Washington via skunkworks <skunkworks@lists.my.co.ke> wrote:

Hello Skunks :-)

Are there techies here who actively use Squid cache in their networks?

What sort of deployments do you have?

Transparent/forward or both?

What value does it add to your network, if any?

I am interested in sharing information about efficient deployments - if any of you believe theirs is.


--
Best regards,
Odhiambo WASHINGTON,
Nairobi,KE
+254733744121/+254722743223
"I can't hear you -- I'm using the scrambler."

_______________________________________________
skunkworks mailing list
skunkworks@lists.my.co.ke
------------
List info, subscribe/unsubscribe
http://lists.my.co.ke/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/skunkworks
------------

Skunkworks Rules
http://my.co.ke/phpbb/viewtopic.php?f=24&t=94
------------
Other services @ http://my.co.ke




--
Best regards,
Odhiambo WASHINGTON,
Nairobi,KE
+254733744121/+254722743223
"I can't hear you -- I'm using the scrambler."