@Aki The absence of proof is not proof of absence
Strictly logically: true. But life isn't strictly logical, heck it isn't even logical. The absence of proof means something, and whatever it means doesn't seem too good. I share aki's frustration with the lack of co-operation (at all levels). I don't know what will break this vicious cycle, but it has to be broken if anything meaningful is to happen. Saidi On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 11:51 PM, Billy <billyx5@gmail.com> wrote:
@Aki The absence of proof is not proof of absence
_______________________________________________ Skunkworks mailing list Skunkworks@lists.my.co.ke http://lists.my.co.ke/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/skunkworks ------------ Skunkworks Rules http://my.co.ke/phpbb/viewtopic.php?f=24&t=94 ------------ Other services @ http://my.co.ke Other lists ------------- Announce: http://lists.my.co.ke/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/skunkworks-announce Science: http://lists.my.co.ke/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/science kazi: http://lists.my.co.ke/cgi-bin/mailman/admin/kazi/general