IMO, Zuku wimax equipment must be set up perfect, it is very unforgiving on any error on set up. When I was in Woodley, my connection (512) performed better than a pals (1Mbps) who was on the same BTS. When I moved to Langata, connection was pathetic. I complained and the Zuku guys moved my receiver. It's now ok, though not as good as it was in Woodley, and not as good as a similar Zuku Wimax 512 setup I have in Ongata Rongai. 2010/11/30 Odhiambo Washington <odhiambo@gmail.com>
On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 5:21 PM, Gichingiri Kuria <gmail@gichingiri.com>wrote:
I moved to Zuku which is considerably cheaper and their 512 was faster than AFOLs 512. (if that makes any sense). I also prefer Zuku coz I can do my torrents and YouTube, AFOL had a policy where if you use too much bandwidth you get slowed down.
I have a Zuku 1Mbps (symmetric) which cannot handle voice traffic. Even supporting Internet alone is a pain. Very disappointing!!!
I find Access Kenya links to be cleaner than Zuku, unless they have not done something on my link which they have done for Gichingiri and a few others who seem happier than I am.
Anyone to contradict this?
-- Best regards, Odhiambo WASHINGTON, Nairobi,KE +254733744121/+254722743223 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Damn!!
_______________________________________________ Skunkworks mailing list Skunkworks@lists.my.co.ke http://lists.my.co.ke/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/skunkworks ------------ Skunkworks Rules http://my.co.ke/phpbb/viewtopic.php?f=24&t=94 ------------ Other services @ http://my.co.ke
-- Gichingiri Kuria _________________________________________ www.website.co.ke / www.sokoletu.co.ke