22 Apr
2010
22 Apr
'10
1:34 p.m.
@Phares - that's not a 1:1 comparison :)
True. Using a slightly flawed comparison model, Britannica looks better, but does not have as much content as Wikipedia, hence the latter's popularity. Basically, if beauty ruled, the former would have more hits... -- With Regards, Phares Kariuki | T: +254 734 810 802 | E: pkariuki@gmail.com | Twitter: kaboro | Skype: kariukiphares |