@Phares - that's not a 1:1 comparison :)

True. Using a slightly flawed comparison model, Britannica looks better, but does not have as much content as Wikipedia, hence the latter's popularity. Basically, if beauty ruled, the former would have more hits...

--
With Regards,

Phares Kariuki

| T: +254 734 810 802 | E: pkariuki@gmail.com | Twitter: kaboro | Skype: kariukiphares |