Everyone is equally entitled to own beliefs, opinion and expression best stated devoid of inferiority or superiority complex. Simply proclaiming being "factual" (or even "truthful") ignores questions -- whose facts? whose truth? and in whose world? On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 9:39 PM, McTim <dogwallah@gmail.com> wrote:
Alex,
On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 11:38 AM, Alex Gakuru <gakuru@gmail.com> wrote:
One could also ask what your personal interest and role in ever defending the status quo really is?
I have zero financial interest in any company that deals with domain names or any aspect of keeping the "status quo" intact (and by that I suspect you mean the NTIA/IANA contract).
I defend what currently works in favor of something untried and untested. I am happy to support change pole pole, but not radical revolutionary changes to Internet Governance that would make the Internet less stable.
My main "interest" is in factual dialogue. I pointed out where your remarks were counterfactual, yet you fail to address that issue.
-- Cheers,
McTim "A name indicates what we seek. An address indicates where it is. A route indicates how we get there." Jon Postel