Everyone is equally entitled to own beliefs, opinion and expression best stated devoid of inferiority or superiority complex.

Simply proclaiming being "factual" (or even "truthful") ignores questions -- whose facts? whose truth? and in whose world?

On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 9:39 PM, McTim <dogwallah@gmail.com> wrote:

Alex,

On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 11:38 AM, Alex Gakuru <gakuru@gmail.com> wrote:
> One could also ask what your personal interest and role in ever defending
> the status quo really is?

I have zero financial interest in any company that deals with domain
names or any aspect of keeping the "status quo" intact (and by that I
suspect you mean the NTIA/IANA contract).

I defend what currently works in favor of something untried and
untested. 狢 am happy to support change pole pole, but not radical
revolutionary changes to Internet Governance that would make the
Internet less stable.

My main "interest" is in factual dialogue. 狢 pointed out where your
remarks were counterfactual, yet you fail to address that issue.

--
Cheers,

McTim
"A name indicates what we seek. An address indicates where it is. A
route indicates how we get there." 獱on Postel