Windows 7 Wireless vs Ethernet Issue
Happy new year friends, I have a friend who just bought a HP laptop which came bundled with Windows 7. He informs me that he is unable to use both Wireless and Ethernet at the same time and in order to use either, he has to disable the other. I am not familiar with this problem and apparently, neither is Google. It is for this reason that I have opted to "escalate" this matter to the venerable skunktoids, with the hope that I will find someone who has experienced this before and has the solution to this problem. Meanwhile, I thank you in advance for your kind assistance. Me.
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 9:31 AM, Simon Mbuthia <simon.mbuthia@gmail.com> wrote:
Happy new year friends,
I have a friend who just bought a HP laptop which came bundled with Windows 7. He informs me that he is unable to use both Wireless and Ethernet at the same time and in order to use either, he has to disable the other. I am not
My work laptop (HP EliteBook 8440p, Vista Enterprise) has the same behaviour, but I was under the impression it's a custom config for security reasons. I'll check with out HP IT guys and see if they can help. Regards, Steve -- This message represents the official view of the voices in my head.
I have just come across this link http://answers.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/forum/windows_7-networking/window... I have sent it to him and I hope it works. Says that HP/Compaq laptops have a certain setting that needs to be changed. Might you guys have tried this by any chance? Me On 17 January 2012 09:40, Steve Muchai <smuchai@gmail.com> wrote:
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 9:31 AM, Simon Mbuthia <simon.mbuthia@gmail.com> wrote:
Happy new year friends,
I have a friend who just bought a HP laptop which came bundled with Windows 7. He informs me that he is unable to use both Wireless and Ethernet at the same time and in order to use either, he has to disable the other. I am not
My work laptop (HP EliteBook 8440p, Vista Enterprise) has the same behaviour, but I was under the impression it's a custom config for security reasons. I'll check with out HP IT guys and see if they can help.
Regards, Steve
-- This message represents the official view of the voices in my head. _______________________________________________ Skunkworks mailing list Skunkworks@lists.my.co.ke ------------ List info, subscribe/unsubscribe http://lists.my.co.ke/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/skunkworks ------------
Skunkworks Rules http://my.co.ke/phpbb/viewtopic.php?f=24&t=94 ------------ Other services @ http://my.co.ke
And I think that the following statement, derived from the same URL, makes so much sense: "*It's perfectly normal, you cannot have two concurrent connections.*" Imagine the following: Both WLAN and Ethernet are active. Your LAN subnet is 192.168.x.x/24 Your WLAN has obtained 192.168.x.10/24 while your Ethernet has 192.168.x.11/24. In both cases, Gateway is 192.168.x.254. What is the use?? Imagine another scenario, where the AP is wired to a different Internet provider while the Ethernet is wired also to a different Internet provider. You get assigned two different network addresses on the WLAN and Ethernet. However, all traffic gets sent out via the Gateway with the highest METRIC (the lower number). It means some services fail unless you specify some static routes, right? Something along the lines: route add -p 0.0.0.0 mask 0.0.0.0 interfaceNUM (for WLAN) route add -p 192.168.x.0 mask 255.255.255.0 interfaceNUM (for Ethernet) Actually, someone please tell answer me this question: In scenario 2, suppose I want ALL Internet traffic to go out via WLAN and all LAN traffic to go through the Ethernet, are those commands really correct?? Back to @Simon Mbuthia and his pal - what was the initial intention of having both interfaces active at the same time? On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 09:58, Simon Mbuthia <simon.mbuthia@gmail.com>wrote:
I have just come across this link http://answers.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/forum/windows_7-networking/window...
I have sent it to him and I hope it works. Says that HP/Compaq laptops have a certain setting that needs to be changed. Might you guys have tried this by any chance?
Me
On 17 January 2012 09:40, Steve Muchai <smuchai@gmail.com> wrote:
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 9:31 AM, Simon Mbuthia <simon.mbuthia@gmail.com> wrote:
Happy new year friends,
I have a friend who just bought a HP laptop which came bundled with Windows 7. He informs me that he is unable to use both Wireless and Ethernet at the same time and in order to use either, he has to disable the other. I am not
My work laptop (HP EliteBook 8440p, Vista Enterprise) has the same behaviour, but I was under the impression it's a custom config for security reasons. I'll check with out HP IT guys and see if they can help.
Regards, Steve
-- This message represents the official view of the voices in my head. _______________________________________________ Skunkworks mailing list Skunkworks@lists.my.co.ke ------------ List info, subscribe/unsubscribe http://lists.my.co.ke/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/skunkworks ------------
Skunkworks Rules http://my.co.ke/phpbb/viewtopic.php?f=24&t=94 ------------ Other services @ http://my.co.ke
_______________________________________________ Skunkworks mailing list Skunkworks@lists.my.co.ke ------------ List info, subscribe/unsubscribe http://lists.my.co.ke/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/skunkworks ------------
Skunkworks Rules http://my.co.ke/phpbb/viewtopic.php?f=24&t=94 ------------ Other services @ http://my.co.ke
-- Best regards, Odhiambo WASHINGTON, Nairobi,KE +254733744121/+254722743223 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I can't hear you -- I'm using the scrambler. Please consider the environment before printing this email.
Hey Wash, Thanks for your email. My pal had told me that he sometimes creates a hotspot using his phone and surfs the net using his data bundle. The points you have raised are quite reasonable, I must say, but as a network admin, I would use different subnets for LAN and WLAN e.g. Class C addresses on the WLAN and Class B addresses on the LAN or vice versa. Anyway, I think that's a minor detail. He needs to use his bundles by creating an AP using his phone. BTW, it seems like it's only HP/Compaq laptops which have this issue. Why would the other makes allow both ethernet and WLAN? Me On 17 January 2012 10:17, Odhiambo Washington <odhiambo@gmail.com> wrote:
And I think that the following statement, derived from the same URL, makes so much sense:
"*It's perfectly normal, you cannot have two concurrent connections.*"
Imagine the following:
Both WLAN and Ethernet are active. Your LAN subnet is 192.168.x.x/24 Your WLAN has obtained 192.168.x.10/24 while your Ethernet has 192.168.x.11/24. In both cases, Gateway is 192.168.x.254. What is the use??
Imagine another scenario, where the AP is wired to a different Internet provider while the Ethernet is wired also to a different Internet provider.
You get assigned two different network addresses on the WLAN and Ethernet. However, all traffic gets sent out via the Gateway with the highest METRIC (the lower number). It means some services fail unless you specify some static routes, right? Something along the lines:
route add -p 0.0.0.0 mask 0.0.0.0 interfaceNUM (for WLAN) route add -p 192.168.x.0 mask 255.255.255.0 interfaceNUM (for Ethernet)
Actually, someone please tell answer me this question: In scenario 2, suppose I want ALL Internet traffic to go out via WLAN and all LAN traffic to go through the Ethernet, are those commands really correct??
Back to @Simon Mbuthia and his pal - what was the initial intention of having both interfaces active at the same time?
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 09:58, Simon Mbuthia <simon.mbuthia@gmail.com>wrote:
I have just come across this link http://answers.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/forum/windows_7-networking/window...
I have sent it to him and I hope it works. Says that HP/Compaq laptops have a certain setting that needs to be changed. Might you guys have tried this by any chance?
Me
On 17 January 2012 09:40, Steve Muchai <smuchai@gmail.com> wrote:
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 9:31 AM, Simon Mbuthia <simon.mbuthia@gmail.com> wrote:
Happy new year friends,
I have a friend who just bought a HP laptop which came bundled with Windows 7. He informs me that he is unable to use both Wireless and Ethernet at the same time and in order to use either, he has to disable the other. I am not
My work laptop (HP EliteBook 8440p, Vista Enterprise) has the same behaviour, but I was under the impression it's a custom config for security reasons. I'll check with out HP IT guys and see if they can help.
Regards, Steve
-- This message represents the official view of the voices in my head. _______________________________________________ Skunkworks mailing list Skunkworks@lists.my.co.ke ------------ List info, subscribe/unsubscribe http://lists.my.co.ke/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/skunkworks ------------
Skunkworks Rules http://my.co.ke/phpbb/viewtopic.php?f=24&t=94 ------------ Other services @ http://my.co.ke
_______________________________________________ Skunkworks mailing list Skunkworks@lists.my.co.ke ------------ List info, subscribe/unsubscribe http://lists.my.co.ke/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/skunkworks ------------
Skunkworks Rules http://my.co.ke/phpbb/viewtopic.php?f=24&t=94 ------------ Other services @ http://my.co.ke
-- Best regards, Odhiambo WASHINGTON, Nairobi,KE +254733744121/+254722743223 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I can't hear you -- I'm using the scrambler. Please consider the environment before printing this email.
_______________________________________________ Skunkworks mailing list Skunkworks@lists.my.co.ke ------------ List info, subscribe/unsubscribe http://lists.my.co.ke/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/skunkworks ------------
Skunkworks Rules http://my.co.ke/phpbb/viewtopic.php?f=24&t=94 ------------ Other services @ http://my.co.ke
On 17 January 2012 10:34, Simon Mbuthia <simon.mbuthia@gmail.com> wrote:
Hey Wash,
Thanks for your email. My pal had told me that he sometimes creates a hotspot using his phone and surfs the net using his data bundle. The points you have raised are quite reasonable, I must say, but as a network admin, I would use different subnets for LAN and WLAN e.g. Class C addresses on the WLAN and Class B addresses on the LAN or vice versa. Anyway, I think that's a minor detail. He needs to use his bundles by creating an AP using his phone.
BTW, it seems like it's only HP/Compaq laptops which have this issue. Why would the other makes allow both ethernet and WLAN?
Me
On 17 January 2012 10:17, Odhiambo Washington <odhiambo@gmail.com> wrote:
And I think that the following statement, derived from the same URL, makes so much sense:
"*It's perfectly normal, you cannot have two concurrent connections.*"
Imagine the following:
Both WLAN and Ethernet are active. Your LAN subnet is 192.168.x.x/24 Your WLAN has obtained 192.168.x.10/24 while your Ethernet has 192.168.x.11/24. In both cases, Gateway is 192.168.x.254. What is the use??
Imagine another scenario, where the AP is wired to a different Internet provider while the Ethernet is wired also to a different Internet provider.
You get assigned two different network addresses on the WLAN and Ethernet. However, all traffic gets sent out via the Gateway with the highest METRIC (the lower number). It means some services fail unless you specify some static routes, right? Something along the lines:
route add -p 0.0.0.0 mask 0.0.0.0 interfaceNUM (for WLAN) route add -p 192.168.x.0 mask 255.255.255.0 interfaceNUM (for Ethernet)
Actually, someone please tell answer me this question: In scenario 2, suppose I want ALL Internet traffic to go out via WLAN and all LAN traffic to go through the Ethernet, are those commands really correct??
Back to @Simon Mbuthia and his pal - what was the initial intention of having both interfaces active at the same time?
I must comment on this and say that is a windows failure esp of W7. On XP this worked/works quite fine and acts like redundant or if you want to test some gargets on one card/network interface and still be on internet on the other. Am on Ubuntu and i connect both wireless and cable at the same time for i test alot of stuff whilest i want still to access network pheripheries or internet! OR. Like mine here, if by mistake the cable is unplugged or power goes off on my switch my wireless picks up without any second thought! So is vice versa! wilson@wilson:~$ ip a 1: lo: <LOOPBACK,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 16436 qdisc noqueue state UNKNOWN link/loopback 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd 00:00:00:00:00:00 inet 127.0.0.1/8 scope host lo inet6 ::1/128 scope host valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever 2: *eth0*: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc mq state UP qlen 1000 link/ether 88:ae:1d:7b:e2:fc brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff * inet 192.168.100.121/24 brd 192.168.100.255 scope global eth0* inet6 fe80::8aae:1dff:fe7b:e2fc/64 scope link valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever 3: *wlan0*: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc mq state UP qlen 1000 link/ether 5c:ac:4c:78:21:e5 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff * inet 192.168.100.122/24 brd 192.168.100.255 scope global wlan0* inet6 fe80::5eac:4cff:fe78:21e5/64 scope link valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever wilson@wilson:~$ ip ro *default via 192.168.100.254 dev eth0 proto static * 192.168.100.0/24 dev eth0 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.100.121 metric 1 192.168.100.0/24 dev wlan0 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.100.122 metric 2 Niatia ! Wilson./
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 09:58, Simon Mbuthia <simon.mbuthia@gmail.com>wrote:
I have just come across this link http://answers.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/forum/windows_7-networking/window...
I have sent it to him and I hope it works. Says that HP/Compaq laptops have a certain setting that needs to be changed. Might you guys have tried this by any chance?
Me
On 17 January 2012 09:40, Steve Muchai <smuchai@gmail.com> wrote:
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 9:31 AM, Simon Mbuthia <simon.mbuthia@gmail.com> wrote:
Happy new year friends,
I have a friend who just bought a HP laptop which came bundled with Windows 7. He informs me that he is unable to use both Wireless and Ethernet at the same time and in order to use either, he has to disable the other. I am not
My work laptop (HP EliteBook 8440p, Vista Enterprise) has the same behaviour, but I was under the impression it's a custom config for security reasons. I'll check with out HP IT guys and see if they can help.
Regards, Steve
-- This message represents the official view of the voices in my head. _______________________________________________ Skunkworks mailing list Skunkworks@lists.my.co.ke ------------ List info, subscribe/unsubscribe http://lists.my.co.ke/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/skunkworks ------------
Skunkworks Rules http://my.co.ke/phpbb/viewtopic.php?f=24&t=94 ------------ Other services @ http://my.co.ke
_______________________________________________ Skunkworks mailing list Skunkworks@lists.my.co.ke ------------ List info, subscribe/unsubscribe http://lists.my.co.ke/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/skunkworks ------------
Skunkworks Rules http://my.co.ke/phpbb/viewtopic.php?f=24&t=94 ------------ Other services @ http://my.co.ke
-- Best regards, Odhiambo WASHINGTON, Nairobi,KE +254733744121/+254722743223 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I can't hear you -- I'm using the scrambler. Please consider the environment before printing this email.
_______________________________________________ Skunkworks mailing list Skunkworks@lists.my.co.ke ------------ List info, subscribe/unsubscribe http://lists.my.co.ke/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/skunkworks ------------
Skunkworks Rules http://my.co.ke/phpbb/viewtopic.php?f=24&t=94 ------------ Other services @ http://my.co.ke
_______________________________________________ Skunkworks mailing list Skunkworks@lists.my.co.ke ------------ List info, subscribe/unsubscribe http://lists.my.co.ke/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/skunkworks ------------
Skunkworks Rules http://my.co.ke/phpbb/viewtopic.php?f=24&t=94 ------------ Other services @ http://my.co.ke
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 10:34, Simon Mbuthia <simon.mbuthia@gmail.com>wrote:
Hey Wash,
Thanks for your email. My pal had told me that he sometimes creates a hotspot using his phone and surfs the net using his data bundle. The points you have raised are quite reasonable, I must say, but as a network admin, I would use different subnets for LAN and WLAN e.g. Class C addresses on the WLAN and Class B addresses on the LAN or vice versa. Anyway, I think that's a minor detail. He needs to use his bundles by creating an AP using his phone.
I still need to understand this. When he's using his hotspot (which is via WLAN), is he still able to use resources on the LAN? Do I also assume that their LAN is devoid of the Internet, hence the need to use the hotspot? Or he's limited by certain policies being enforced on the LAN. Anyway, I think those are better answered by him... My interest is on your usage of different subnets for the LAN and WLAN. Do you suppose such a situation would enable one to access, say, Internet on the WLAN and LAN services on the Ethernet automagically?? -- Best regards, Odhiambo WASHINGTON, Nairobi,KE +254733744121/+254722743223 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I can't hear you -- I'm using the scrambler. Please consider the environment before printing this email.
On 17 January 2012 10:45, Odhiambo Washington <odhiambo@gmail.com> wrote:
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 10:34, Simon Mbuthia <simon.mbuthia@gmail.com>wrote:
Hey Wash,
Thanks for your email. My pal had told me that he sometimes creates a hotspot using his phone and surfs the net using his data bundle. The points you have raised are quite reasonable, I must say, but as a network admin, I would use different subnets for LAN and WLAN e.g. Class C addresses on the WLAN and Class B addresses on the LAN or vice versa. Anyway, I think that's a minor detail. He needs to use his bundles by creating an AP using his phone.
I still need to understand this. When he's using his hotspot (which is via WLAN), is he still able to use resources on the LAN? Do I also assume that their LAN is devoid of the Internet, hence the need to use the hotspot? Or he's limited by certain policies being enforced on the LAN. Anyway, I think those are better answered by him...
My interest is on your usage of different subnets for the LAN and WLAN. Do you suppose such a situation would enable one to access, say, Internet on the WLAN and LAN services on the Ethernet automagically??
Wash, actually what you are asking is the real answer [?] - you can do all that. Example, - When you have several subnets on LAN say 192.168.0.0/24, 192.168.1.0/24separated by subnet itself OR by a VLAN. Wlan could be on vlan 10 while ETH is on VLAN 20. Maybe vlan 20 only access LAN and not internet. Or printer is only on the other VLAN away from internet one? - When you are on same VLAN but on diffrent subnets - When you have some devices you may want to test say on Cable and want to remain on internet on the WLAN. Suppose a NEW device came with default ip 192.168.15.1/24 and you are on 192.168.0.0/24, do you need to keep setting new secondary ips on the CABLE or WLAN to access it? Wilson./
-- Best regards, Odhiambo WASHINGTON, Nairobi,KE +254733744121/+254722743223 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I can't hear you -- I'm using the scrambler. Please consider the environment before printing this email.
_______________________________________________ Skunkworks mailing list Skunkworks@lists.my.co.ke ------------ List info, subscribe/unsubscribe http://lists.my.co.ke/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/skunkworks ------------
Skunkworks Rules http://my.co.ke/phpbb/viewtopic.php?f=24&t=94 ------------ Other services @ http://my.co.ke
On 17 January 2012 10:17, Odhiambo Washington <odhiambo@gmail.com> wrote:
And I think that the following statement, derived from the same URL, makes so much sense:
"*It's perfectly normal, you cannot have two concurrent connections.*"
Imagine the following:
Both WLAN and Ethernet are active. Your LAN subnet is 192.168.x.x/24 Your WLAN has obtained 192.168.x.10/24 while your Ethernet has 192.168.x.11/24. In both cases, Gateway is 192.168.x.254. What is the use??
Imagine another scenario, where the AP is wired to a different Internet provider while the Ethernet is wired also to a different Internet provider.
You get assigned two different network addresses on the WLAN and Ethernet. However, all traffic gets sent out via the Gateway with the highest METRIC (the lower number). It means some services fail unless you specify some static routes, right? Something along the lines:
route add -p 0.0.0.0 mask 0.0.0.0 interfaceNUM (for WLAN) route add -p 192.168.x.0 mask 255.255.255.0 interfaceNUM (for Ethernet)
Actually, someone please tell answer me this question: In scenario 2, suppose I want ALL Internet traffic to go out via WLAN and all LAN traffic to go through the Ethernet, are those commands really correct??
*Hi Wash - this is very very correct.*
Back to @Simon Mbuthia and his pal - what was the initial intention of having both interfaces active at the same time?
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 09:58, Simon Mbuthia <simon.mbuthia@gmail.com>wrote:
I have just come across this link http://answers.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/forum/windows_7-networking/window...
I have sent it to him and I hope it works. Says that HP/Compaq laptops have a certain setting that needs to be changed. Might you guys have tried this by any chance?
Me
On 17 January 2012 09:40, Steve Muchai <smuchai@gmail.com> wrote:
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 9:31 AM, Simon Mbuthia <simon.mbuthia@gmail.com> wrote:
Happy new year friends,
I have a friend who just bought a HP laptop which came bundled with Windows 7. He informs me that he is unable to use both Wireless and Ethernet at the same time and in order to use either, he has to disable the other. I am not
My work laptop (HP EliteBook 8440p, Vista Enterprise) has the same behaviour, but I was under the impression it's a custom config for security reasons. I'll check with out HP IT guys and see if they can help.
Regards, Steve
-- This message represents the official view of the voices in my head. _______________________________________________ Skunkworks mailing list Skunkworks@lists.my.co.ke ------------ List info, subscribe/unsubscribe http://lists.my.co.ke/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/skunkworks ------------
Skunkworks Rules http://my.co.ke/phpbb/viewtopic.php?f=24&t=94 ------------ Other services @ http://my.co.ke
_______________________________________________ Skunkworks mailing list Skunkworks@lists.my.co.ke ------------ List info, subscribe/unsubscribe http://lists.my.co.ke/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/skunkworks ------------
Skunkworks Rules http://my.co.ke/phpbb/viewtopic.php?f=24&t=94 ------------ Other services @ http://my.co.ke
-- Best regards, Odhiambo WASHINGTON, Nairobi,KE +254733744121/+254722743223 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I can't hear you -- I'm using the scrambler. Please consider the environment before printing this email.
_______________________________________________ Skunkworks mailing list Skunkworks@lists.my.co.ke ------------ List info, subscribe/unsubscribe http://lists.my.co.ke/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/skunkworks ------------
Skunkworks Rules http://my.co.ke/phpbb/viewtopic.php?f=24&t=94 ------------ Other services @ http://my.co.ke
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 10:43, Thuo Wilson <lixton@gmail.com> wrote:
On 17 January 2012 10:17, Odhiambo Washington <odhiambo@gmail.com> wrote:
And I think that the following statement, derived from the same URL, makes so much sense:
"*It's perfectly normal, you cannot have two concurrent connections.*"
Imagine the following:
Both WLAN and Ethernet are active. Your LAN subnet is 192.168.x.x/24 Your WLAN has obtained 192.168.x.10/24 while your Ethernet has 192.168.x.11/24. In both cases, Gateway is 192.168.x.254. What is the use??
Imagine another scenario, where the AP is wired to a different Internet provider while the Ethernet is wired also to a different Internet provider.
You get assigned two different network addresses on the WLAN and Ethernet. However, all traffic gets sent out via the Gateway with the highest METRIC (the lower number). It means some services fail unless you specify some static routes, right? Something along the lines:
route add -p 0.0.0.0 mask 0.0.0.0 interfaceNUM (for WLAN) route add -p 192.168.x.0 mask 255.255.255.0 interfaceNUM (for Ethernet)
Actually, someone please tell answer me this question: In scenario 2, suppose I want ALL Internet traffic to go out via WLAN and all LAN traffic to go through the Ethernet, are those commands really correct??
*Hi Wash - this is very very correct.*
@Thuo, Thanks, man. Let me try this in a real life situation now and see.... -- Best regards, Odhiambo WASHINGTON, Nairobi,KE +254733744121/+254722743223 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I can't hear you -- I'm using the scrambler. Please consider the environment before printing this email.
I Had a pavilion HP that did the same i sold it immediately :) on a serious note the cause is usually driver conflicts, things trying to use the same port etc check your drivers , download the latest updates On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 9:31 AM, Simon Mbuthia <simon.mbuthia@gmail.com>wrote:
Happy new year friends,
I have a friend who just bought a HP laptop which came bundled with Windows 7. He informs me that he is unable to use both Wireless and Ethernet at the same time and in order to use either, he has to disable the other. I am not familiar with this problem and apparently, neither is Google. It is for this reason that I have opted to "escalate" this matter to the venerable skunktoids, with the hope that I will find someone who has experienced this before and has the solution to this problem.
Meanwhile, I thank you in advance for your kind assistance.
Me.
_______________________________________________ Skunkworks mailing list Skunkworks@lists.my.co.ke ------------ List info, subscribe/unsubscribe http://lists.my.co.ke/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/skunkworks ------------
Skunkworks Rules http://my.co.ke/phpbb/viewtopic.php?f=24&t=94 ------------ Other services @ http://my.co.ke
participants (5)
-
Odhiambo Washington -
Simon Mbuthia -
Steve Muchai -
Theus Owuor -
Thuo Wilson