Courtesy Forbes<http://www.forbes.com/2009/07/07/privacy-cybersecurity-obama-technology-security-privacy.html?partner=links> Security Obama's Cyber Plan Raises Privacy Hackles Andy Greenberg<http://search.forbes.com/search/colArchiveSearch?author=andy+and+greenberg&aname=Andy+Greenberg>, 07.07.09, 02:50 PM EDT Despite assurances of privacy, civil liberties watchdogs say Obama's plan isn't transparent enough. Since Obama's landmark speech on cybersecurity in May, his administration hasn't revealed much about its long-percolating plans to shore up the government's defenses against hackers and cyberspies. But privacy advocates monitoring the initiative are already raising concerns about what they know and what they don't: the details that have trickled out--including the involvement of the National Security Agency<http://topics.forbes.com/National%20Security%20Agency>--and the veil of classified information that still covers much of the multibillion-dollar project. "It feels like the Bush administration<http://topics.forbes.com/Bush%20administration>all over again," says Pam Dixon, executive director of the World Privacy Forum. "Not enough people know the details about these programs to have a good public discussion. We all want good security of government systems, but you have to balance the cloak and dagger elements with civil liberties." Though much of the initiative remains classified, news <http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124657680388089139.html>reports<http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/07/02/AR2009070202771.html>that surfaced Friday revealed that the U.S. Department of Homeland Security is mulling a plan to build a new version of its intrusion detection system known as Einstein, a software program that monitors all government networks. That new system would be designed to not only detect intrusions, but also preemptively block them, preventing the sorts of cyberspying incidents that have plagued the government and military for more than a decade. But the plans involve two controversial players: The revamped monitoring technology would largely come from the NSA and initial tests would take place on *AT&T*<http://finapps.forbes.com/finapps/jsp/finance/compinfo/CIAtAGlance.jsp?tkr=T>'s ( T<http://finapps.forbes.com/finapps/jsp/finance/compinfo/CIAtAGlance.jsp?tkr=T>- news <http://search.forbes.com/search/CompanyNewsSearch?ticker=T> - people <http://people.forbes.com/search?ticker=T>) network, two ideas that bring to mind uncomfortable memories of the warrantless wiretapping programs that rattled civil libertarians under the Bush administration. "The same folks are being potentially entrusted with cybersecurity who have already shown that they have no regard for the law," says Lee Tien, an attorney with the Electronic Frontier Foundation, a nonprofit group that sued AT&T for its involvement in those wiretapping programs. "It's troubling that the Obama administration would consider this sort of thing." At issue is whether government monitoring of networks could lead to intrusion in the digital lives of private citizens, whether through monitoring their visits to government Web sites or by blurring the line between government and private networks, privacy advocates argue. Much of the critical infrastructure that President Obama has spoken of protecting, including the power grid and telecommunications, is owned by the private sector. -- Solomon Mburu P.O. Box 19343 - 00202 Nairobi Cell: (+254-0) 735 431041 Man is a gregarious animal and enjoys agreement as cows will graze all the same way to the side of a hill! AND It is better to die in dignity than in the ignomity of ambiguous generosity!