On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 2:10 PM, Fellow Skunk <fellowskunker@gmail.com> wrote:

Finally..............I think I have confirmed my fears.

PETER MUST BE IN SAFCOM PR.

@ Fellow Skunk, not that I am defending the other Peter, but, if you do just a little digging using some easily accessible common tools, you will realize that the evidence available strongly indicates that the other Peter does not work for Safcom PR... :-)