Exactly the same thing popped up in my head the second I saw this phone:
Charging REQUIRES exposure to the sun.
Exposure to sun = HEAT
HEAT + Battery = Very Dead Battery Very Fast
Frequent HEAT (and cooling) + Circuit Board = Very Degraded Circuit Board Very Fast
Conclusion: Good Idea, Bone-headed application. 3K Wasted.
Surely, they could have done better. Maybe Not.

HL

On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 2:41 PM, wesley kiriinya <kiriinya2000@yahoo.com> wrote:

So $afcom has lauched a solar charged phone for about 3K. Interesting especially for guys without electricity *cough*The Entire Country*cough*.
 
I began to wonder about the battery life thus the value of the entire package.
 
AFAIK, if a battery for a mobile device is discharged and recharged frequently without the charge (almost) running out then that reduces the battery life. The phone will often be exposed to the sun thus it will recharge unless there is a switch to control this. Even if there is a switch, I assume solar charging will take longer than the average time so most users would just leave it on and let the phone recharge whenever it's exposed to the sun.
 
If someone gets a hold of it, confirm/deny my wonders.
 
O_O

 


_______________________________________________
Skunkworks mailing list
Skunkworks@lists.my.co.ke
http://lists.my.co.ke/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/skunkworks
Other services @ http://my.co.ke
Other lists
-------------
Announce: http://lists.my.co.ke/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/skunkworks-announce
Science:  http://lists.my.co.ke/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/science
kazi:     http://lists.my.co.ke/cgi-bin/mailman/admin/kazi/general