On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 3:47 PM, maina martin
<martinafrique@gmail.com> wrote:
IMOP am not justifying the 200m .
Imelda vs Nokia
for a simple job like;
an Ivoice response and may be an auto answering machine a bible and quran,with DVD /TV remote control application.
Imeldas company can get the job done by even 1/4 of 2m for obvius reasons
1.Imelda is not a multinational
2.she is hardly known
3.I dont expect her to gain much from the application iin terms of quick returns
Nokia
1.for evry 3 phones 2 are nokia
so if we have around 20 million phones in kenya 14.5 or so are nokia..
which means they got enough what is a dream to imelda is pocket change for nokia
if i charge them a lower or what many call reasonable they aoutomatically disqualify me as joker and having substardard applications.
so the problem is NOKIA subcontracting direct, have a diffrent firm to do the contracts with that in kenya you will av all you want at so called reasonable price.
mpesa mmmmmmhh wish I invented it ,knowing what i know would have sold it at 1.99....billion.
wonder if safcom having what they av now could call it crazy