@Dennis, look at it from the deterrence point of view. If the state abdicated on its roles, what little contribution can you make? I may not succeed in bringing the bad guys to book, but I may just discourage the vice.

CCTVs have been there since when pluto was a planet, but should their use be inadmissible to authorities, you can leverage on their less costly alternatives and twist their use into interesting initiatives especially on emerging media - 'crowd-sourcing deterrence'. 

When you are an afflicted party, any form of evidence is good evidence. It builds up on your claims apart from offering some psychological  score of having done your part. Ask that guy who's chasing some payment for services offered about his sentiments on evidence to prop up his case. (BTW, if he's reading this, in legal circles, there's a tool that looks  handy on paper   :  "Demand Letter" )

Samples :
You just never know what impact social groupings like KOT may come in handy. 


Tony