@Michael, What oppression is this of which you speak? My response was confined to the sentiments raised originally: I am in complete disagreement with the originator of this post who claims Safaricom should somehow be contained for having the temerity to sell domains, something that he currently does, at cheaper rates. This defies the basic tenets of economics 101 - cost/benefit analysis, willing buyer & willing seller. On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 2:52 PM, MICHAEL AKUNGA <michaelakunga@gmail.com> wrote:
@Mark it is the shareholder in you that is talking please can you also talk as a user and non shareholder. @Rad and @Mark Companies are made of strategies of mutual measure as far as the client is good the company is Banking millions,good. now what happens when the client is Oppressed, is that oppression strategy? I call it Un Mutual strategy, the clients are being at loose of clever lies, YES CCK is the WATCH DOG, TRUE but does it warrant a CORE COMPANY as the 'DISPUTED' to take advantage of its subjects(clients) in the name 'THE WATCH DOG IS A SLEEP' all in all they will make millions but there come a time when the clients wakes and the subjects has his day home, "the day of the Jackal"