The new server is 'rejecting' mails or what? I hope it's life span is not shorter than its predecesessor. On 22/07/2010, Samuel Wachira <wachirasam@gmail.com> wrote:
Nini hii?
Yenyewe we need a new server..
Wah. .sam
On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 6:09 PM, Mail Delivery Subsystem < mailer-daemon@googlemail.com> wrote:
This is an automatically generated Delivery Status Notification
THIS IS A WARNING MESSAGE ONLY.
YOU DO NOT NEED TO RESEND YOUR MESSAGE.
Delivery to the following recipient has been delayed:
skunkworks@lists.my.co.ke
Message will be retried for 2 more day(s)
Technical details of temporary failure: The recipient server did not accept our requests to connect. Learn more at http://mail.google.com/support/bin/answer.py?answer=7720 [mail.my.co.ke. (10): Connection timed out]
----- Original message -----
MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.142.207.9 with SMTP id e9mr9265803wfg.346.1279634259063; Tue, 20 Jul 2010 06:57:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.142.226.13 with HTTP; Tue, 20 Jul 2010 06:57:38 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <AANLkTinqBr8hxySX_DBmYQJ-B5oOp9heulBnt3W8yOal@mail.gmail.com
References: <AANLkTin6uIkQb65EqvY6qCsaOtudKf_aO_dhmZPaAC6d@mail.gmail.com> <470531.825.qm@web112005.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> <AANLkTikfJzeF88mKVPHEm4m7IM0uqD0ifVClqC_Wuq3S@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTimDJbhPc4Ds356ThOpwlTEg1_MJrumYkbwC0gfK@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTimvn9mFX1pDS2HDTt3k-sXpzuxaMcmixP2_5Oma@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTim04cPRLMTiljeRpEg4jy8IIsZxxkAd1VMH1W5j@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTilnxrX0Ree0_Oz1d2e2gYerAzR1B7IiLU-3udOC@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTinqBr8hxySX_DBmYQJ-B5oOp9heulBnt3W8yOal@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2010 16:57:38 +0300 Message-ID: <AANLkTilFEqNf984vnYvulpYqlWrLWJgu2PKx7gkwb5yX@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: [Skunkworks] Any Virtualization Experts Here? From: Samuel Wachira <wachirasam@gmail.com> To: Skunkworks Mailing List <skunkworks@lists.my.co.ke> Content-Type: multipart/related; boundary=000e0cd32c4e75d59a048bd211e9
Wash..
First off, what are the specs for the below: Vmware Workstation: Anything prior to v7 will not support Win2k8 Target Host specs Please note that you need to install VMWare Wkstation on the target machine (where you want to run the win2k8x64) then use the import wizard:
[image: Import.gif] On Mon, Jul 5, 2010 at 10:23 PM, Odhiambo Washington <odhiambo@gmail.com
wrote:
On Mon, Jul 5, 2010 at 2:00 PM, Samuel Wachira <wachirasam@gmail.com wrote:
I beg to differ with Amarjit on virtualbox being a better host.
We have been running a virtualization project for the last two years,
and
virtualbox failed spectacularly on Solaris: we lost money buying a legit version of vmware (but went baremetal on ESX4).
Wash, Is the VM workstation where you are transferring the win2k8 running on x64? Coz Vmware Workstation running on 32bit O/S will not accept a guest running 64bit.
I'd like to virtualize a Windows 2k8 x64 running on a laptop. I am just at the image creating stage. I need to create and stash the image aside...FIRST:-) That is what is failing when I am using converter.
-- Best regards, Odhiambo WASHINGTON, Nairobi,KE +254733744121/+254722743223 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ "If you have nothing good to say about someone, just shut up!." -- Lucky Dube
_______________________________________________ Skunkworks mailing list Skunkworks@lists.my.co.ke http://lists.my.co.ke/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/skunkworks ------------ Skunkworks Server donations spreadsheet
http://spreadsheets.google.com/ccc?key=0AopdHkqSqKL-dHlQVTMxU1VBdU1BSWJxdy1f...
------------ Skunkworks Rules http://my.co.ke/phpbb/viewtopic.php?f=24&t=94 ------------ Other services @ http://my.co.ke
-- Solomon Mbũrũ Kamau ***************************************************** Man is a gregarious animal and enjoys agreement as cows will graze all the same way to the side of a hill! AND It is better to die in dignity than in the ignomity of ambiguous generosity! http://smiley2.wordpress.com http://mburu.sikika.co.ke