in terms of SEO then static sites outdo dynamic sites due to the fact that the search engine bots crawl and index the individual html pages, i.e. body content. URL rewriting on dynamic sites levels the playing ground. ama that was not ur question? On 8/6/09, Samuel Waithaka <samwaithaka@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi guys,
I had dismissed the idea that there is a serious web site that can be static; I was however told of an SEO expert who convinced a client that static (html period...) is the safe way to go; I'm not talking about rewrites... How concrete is this?
-- Samuel Waithaka http://www.brighterdayweb.com http://www.linkedin.com/in/waithaka http://twitter.com/samwaithaka http://www.brighterdayweb.com/seo-articles.xml _______________________________________________ Skunkworks mailing list Skunkworks@lists.my.co.ke http://lists.my.co.ke/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/skunkworks Other services @ http://my.co.ke Other lists ------------- Announce: http://lists.my.co.ke/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/skunkworks-announce Science: http://lists.my.co.ke/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/science kazi: http://lists.my.co.ke/cgi-bin/mailman/admin/kazi/general