Well, because of the red colour I cant get time to look at anything that may be appealing about the implementation of Joomla in that site. Generally about the site, though it may be good technically, its missing out on some aspects that are also important in determining whether it will achieve its objectives. I was actually interested to discover what data offers they have but the colour is chasing me away. Regarding whether Joomla or Drupal is better for site building, it all depends on the functionality that one wants, and of course many other things. My thoughts. Evans On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 6:13 PM, Phares Kariuki <pkariuki@gmail.com> wrote:
On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 9:45 AM, Webmaster <webmaster@kenyanlyrics.com>wrote:
Proving once again that Joomla is the best HANDS DOWN in the aesthetics department. There's no way you could get a Drupal site looking as sexy as that.
http://www.whitehouse.gov/ http://www.nextbillion.net/ http://www.topkeyrealty.com/
A bad workman blames his tools. It's about the designer, not the CMS.The sites are an example of what I find good design. Some the Airtel site is too loud IMHO, but again, design is subjective to some extent...
-- With Regards,
Phares Kariuki
| T: +254 720 406 093 | E: pkariuki@gmail.com | Twitter: kaboro | Skype: kariukiphares | B: http://www.kaboro.com/ |
_______________________________________________ Skunkworks mailing list Skunkworks@lists.my.co.ke http://lists.my.co.ke/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/skunkworks ------------ Skunkworks Rules http://my.co.ke/phpbb/viewtopic.php?f=24&t=94 ------------ Other services @ http://my.co.ke