On 13 June 2012 09:56, John Gitau <jgitau@gmail.com> wrote:

ehh whats wrong with the site. What if the designer actually met the requirements? I mean who dictates what a site should look like. As far as I can tell the content there is way better than some 'well designed' sites.

How about maybe offer a suggestion on what you'd like to see, if you did a free site for the state house for instance what makes you believe we would like it more than the one there?

Me devos advocate (though I seriously see lots of bashing here so just before you start on me let me try defend someone:-))
JG