On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 2:23 PM, Joseph Wayodi
<jwayodi@gmail.com> wrote:
On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 1:20 PM, aki
<aki275@gmail.com> wrote:
@Joseph, under my personal view motto and hopefully applied one day when code get serious enough, don't need any GPL/BSD/MIT license exploits to allow permission. The permissions granted will be the the non-coder users ( the real users = consumers/gerenal public ) of the system. No need for complex and loop holes to exploit anything.
my view. :-)
Do you mean you won't allow modifications to your code at all? How will that be good for your users? Don't forget that users will at some point desire to change the code.
Like I said, I think you're missing the point. You seem to be stuck thinking about yourself as a developer, and are not thinking about what's good for your users.
Joseph.
@Joseph, thnks. What would be the inter-action between the motto and the general public to improve on code and functionality? Traditional this is done via feedback on any system that needs improvement with the general public, the mechanism would be there to take in the proposed changes. Again, my motto says that like minded people who share similar views, so the code community would have to collectively achieve the end result of any proposed changes. But no member of the public will have access to the code, that will never happen.
Rgds.