Not sure about the NGO model...
yes... forgive my short n00b foresight... but theeen, we could run
like a NGO :-D... no profit, no loss. And besides... i'm sure we'll
figure out a revenue model like the open-source guys (linux, centOS,
obuntu, gnome, etc) did....
and the 3G/4G thing.... we could go the Orange way, and claim we're
"testing it", and then like orange, we could black-mail GoK into
paying the $$$ fees.
... and may be... just may be, as an NGO, we could get the fees waived
as part of the tax exemption thingy NGOs get.
and investment-wise... well, with volunteer skunkies, costs would be
significantly reduced... and to reduce workloads, we'd just need to
design and build elaborate, 99% uptime systems... and i'm sure we have
more than enuf competent skunkies to achieve that :-)
if we put our minds to it... we can pull it off!!
On 8/14/11, Bernard Mwagiru <bmwagiru@gmail.com> wrote:
> Assuming 1/3rd of the 3 million plus data users buy this unbelievable offer,
> and considering the high capex required for the 3g/4g license and
> infrastructure (base stations, power, fiber backhaul, core equipment,etc),
> what would our ROI be and when would we breakeven with such cheap service?
> Just some of the queries we should expect from investors or VC...
>
> ./bernard
> sent from my android device.
>
> On Aug 14, 2011 5:51 PM, "John Doe Smith Kamau KipNg'etich Jones" <
> skunkworks.ku@gmail.com> wrote:
>> true....
>> but to help give it a marketing boost (& a fashionable entrance),
>> skunk-telco could start off with nationwide 3G/4G coverage,
>> unthrottled unlimited data plans, cheap bundles..... may be
>> industrial-grade wifi transmitters on every cell tower... skunk-telco
>> could save cost with open source skunk-code, a few volunteer staff....
>> modest profit-making.
>> .... well, with the above, i'd buy a SIM and volunteer for customer
>> care on friday nights :-) ..... (... yeah, i may need to find a social
>> life)
>>
>> On 8/14/11, Bernard Mwagiru <bmwagiru@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> What about the business acumen required? The technical know-how
>>> notwithstanding, the telecom industry is extremely versatile, competition
> is
>>> stiff. For anyone venturing into this, irrespective of capital base,
>>> mastering the market dynamics will determine success or burnt fingers.
>>>
>>> Bernard
>>>
>>> On Sun, Aug 14, 2011 at 1:22 PM, John Doe Smith Kamau KipNg'etich Jones <
>>> skunkworks.ku@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> hmm... I guess you're ryt steve
>>>>
>>>> so much for skunky-telco, :-D
>>>>
>>>> On 8/14/11, Steve Obbayi <steve@sobbayi.com> wrote:
>>>> >
>>>> > computer engineers and electrical engineers who are the core of
>>>> > telecommunications
>>>> > are as competent in coding if not more than computer scientists.
>>>> Hardware
>>>> > is
>>>> > not about screw drivers nuts and bolts, its about the low level code
>>>> > that
>>>> > contols
>>>> > that make the hardware work. The Apis computers scientists program
>>>> against
>>>> > are designed by the electrical/computer engineers. in fact these
>>>> engineers
>>>> > can do
>>>> > everything comp scientists do but comp scientists cant qualify to do
>>>> > what
>>>> > elec/comp
>>>> > engineers do.
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > ----- "John Doe Smith Kamau KipNg'etich Jones" <
> skunkworks.ku@gmail.com>
>>>> > wrote:
>>>> >
>>>> >> correction:
>>>> >>
>>>> >> probably even better than the hardware company because their software
>>>> >> expertise can help make the operations of the *hardware* company more
>>>> >> efficient
>>>> >>
>>>> >> On 8/14/11, John Doe Smith Kamau KipNg'etich Jones
>>>> >> <skunkworks.ku@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> >> > .... or the software company could buy the "core competencies" by
>>>> >> > buying the hardware company, and do quite well in, hypothetically,
>>>> >> the
>>>> >> > telecom industry... probably even better than the hardware company
>>>> >> > because their software expertise can help make the operations of
>>>> >> the
>>>> >> > software company more efficient... after all, its binary data that
>>>> >> > runs these hardware, not bolts and gears
>>>> >> >
>>>> >> > hmm.... i wonder how a skunkworks telco would do :-). I'm sure we
>>>> >> have
>>>> >> > every professional needed, from hardware to software to PR and
>>>> >> > marketing...
>>>> >> >
>>>> >> > anyways...
>>>> >> >
>>>> >> > back to code-labour
>>>> >> >
>>>> >> > On 8/14/11, Mark Mwangi <mwangy@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> >> >> I think it comes to core competencies. hardware companies attract
>>>> >> >> people who like working on physical stuff while software companies
>>>> >> >> attract coders so for a software company to attempt venturing into
>>>> >> >> hardware sector like running a Telecom network would be disastrous
>>>> >> in
>>>> >> >> my books.
>>>> >> >>
>>>> >> >> On 8/14/11, Bernard Mwagiru <bmwagiru@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> >> >>> Kindly expound :
>>>> >> >>> - How would Google,apple and Microsoft do it if in Telecoms?
>>>> >> >>> - Any particular reason they haven't done so thus far?
>>>> >> >>> -Google voice, Microsoft Skype, etc....There should be a reason
>>>> >> they've
>>>> >> >>> gone
>>>> >> >>> voice. Lack of last mile or backhaul infrastructure perhaps?
>>>> >> >>>
>>>> >> >>> ./bernard
>>>> >> >>> sent from my android device.
>>>> >> >>>
>>>> >> >>> On Aug 14, 2011 5:01 AM, "gisho" <gichuhie@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> >> >>>> iam looking forward to a day when Google, Apple and Microsoft
>>>> >> will run
>>>> >> >>> their
>>>> >> >>>> own telecoms
>>>> >> >>>>
>>>> >> >>>> am tired of current carriers hanging to very old way of doing
>>>> >> things
>>>> >> >>>> especially when it comes to data plans
>>>> >> >>>>
>>>> >> >>>>
>>>> >> >>>> --
>>>> >> >>>> -erastus
>>>> >> >>>> +254733725373
>>>> >> >>>> tweet fast and free globally via USSD dial +44 203 355 8505 - by
>>>> >> >>>> ussdtweet|messaging365
>>>> >> >>>> Nairobi Kenya
>>>> >> >>>
>>>> >> >>
>>>> >> >>
>>>> >> >> --
>>>> >> >> Regards,
>>>> >> >>
>>>> >> >> Mark Mwangi
>>>> >> >>
>>>> >> >> http://mwangy.posterous.com
>>>> >> >> _______________________________________________
>>>> >> >> Skunkworks mailing list
>>>> >> >> Skunkworks@lists.my.co.ke
>>>> >> >> http://lists.my.co.ke/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/skunkworks
>>>> >> >> ------------
>>>> >> >> Skunkworks Rules
>>>> >> >> http://my.co.ke/phpbb/viewtopic.php?f=24&t=94
>>>> >> >> ------------
>>>> >> >> Other services @ http://my.co.ke
>>>> >> >>
>>>> >> >
>>>> >> _______________________________________________
>>>> >> Skunkworks mailing list
>>>> >> Skunkworks@lists.my.co.ke
>>>> >> http://lists.my.co.ke/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/skunkworks
>>>> >> ------------
>>>> >> Skunkworks Rules
>>>> >> http://my.co.ke/phpbb/viewtopic.php?f=24&t=94
>>>> >> ------------
>>>> >> Other services @ http://my.co.ke
>>>> > _______________________________________________
>>>> > Skunkworks mailing list
>>>> > Skunkworks@lists.my.co.ke
>>>> > http://lists.my.co.ke/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/skunkworks
>>>> > ------------
>>>> > Skunkworks Rules
>>>> > http://my.co.ke/phpbb/viewtopic.php?f=24&t=94
>>>> > ------------
>>>> > Other services @ http://my.co.ke
>>>> >
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Skunkworks mailing list
>>>> Skunkworks@lists.my.co.ke
>>>> http://lists.my.co.ke/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/skunkworks
>>>> ------------
>>>> Skunkworks Rules
>>>> http://my.co.ke/phpbb/viewtopic.php?f=24&t=94
>>>> ------------
>>>> Other services @ http://my.co.ke
>>>>
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Skunkworks mailing list
>> Skunkworks@lists.my.co.ke
>> http://lists.my.co.ke/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/skunkworks
>> ------------
>> Skunkworks Rules
>> http://my.co.ke/phpbb/viewtopic.php?f=24&t=94
>> ------------
>> Other services @ http://my.co.ke
>
_______________________________________________
Skunkworks mailing list
Skunkworks@lists.my.co.ke
http://lists.my.co.ke/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/skunkworks
------------
Skunkworks Rules
http://my.co.ke/phpbb/viewtopic.php?f=24&t=94
------------
Other services @ http://my.co.ke