On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 12:13 PM, Wanjau <wanjaustev@gmail.com> wrote:
Heya Listers!

Let me first begin by thanking all of you who replied to my E-mail by either making it more off topic or otherwise :)


Hehee, like myself :)
 
It is true there once existed IE then Firefox and then the rest followed. This is a win-win for Mozilla since that was its primary reason to exist, which is to bring sanity to the web and push for open standards on the web. If it were not for Mozilla, it is highly likely that the only browser that would be there in the market currently would be IE!

I think Firefox came out much later as a result of some changes somewhere. There existed IE and Netscape Navigator, then Netscape Communicator.
 

Mozilla gives you a voice on the web to say what aggrieves you or what doesn’t make you happy. If it is the RAM consumption, browser keeps crashing or any other error. See [2] for a fix on that. Mozilla answers to no one but you. We do not have shareholders who keep us on the toes but our users are our greatest responsibility. We are the browser with a mission and a browser guided by principles..Mozilla has its system of tracking bugs at [3] and I would recommend you to file any bug related to our products there. There is almost someone always on the other side waiting for you to click the save this bug button!


I agree with the bug tracking. I have used it and got answered in a record time - with a solution.

 
At the panel I talked about the costs of internet and that go back button w/o a reload would save us some Mbs :)I also suggested that they should look into mobile as most of the peeps here access the web via their mobile devices and not any type of devices but the likes of Nokia 1680c. 

Whenever I download Firefox, there is always a mobile version suggested - for Android. So you suggested that they should look into a version for Windows Mobile and Symbian??

 
This was as per the data provided at Wordcamp 2012. Our desktop users are missing out on great features like Firefox sync on their ‘low-end' mobile phones. 


Chrome-sync vs Firefox-sync; Chrome OS vs Firefox/Mozilla OS... Actually, I have never used Chrome sync so no idea about what I'd gain with FF sync either.


 
Firefox for Android now supports the ARM V6 gadgets and I advice you give it a run and if you find any errors go to [3].
FYI, Mozilla is coming up with its own OS for Mobile and Tablets which shall be launched next year. It is currently in its testing phases with support on several devices. The OS is made of CSS, JavaScript and HTML5. This OS is targeted for the global south who can afford Smartphone worth $100 USD and lower. This is an ignored market by both Android and obviously APPL plus the likes of  RIM. So we are not coming in as competitors!



FF development cycle (not sure about the correct reference to churning out new versions) every 2 or so months has been an eyesore to me. Still, they have flashplugin crashing always..

Tigerfuit?? :-)


--
Best regards,
Odhiambo WASHINGTON,
Nairobi,KE
+254733744121/+254722743223
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
I can't hear you -- I'm using the scrambler.