Just been reading this article http://www.standardmedia.co.ke/InsidePage.php?id=2000025530&cid=4& and find the matters discussed in the article disturbing. In my travels all over in ke to see the beauty and diversity of the country over the many years, there are numerious times I've seen this ugly subject brought forth. New Constitution or not, it has no impact on the deep rooted problems that are well spread over KE. I think this line in the story above says it all "said they have vowed not to allow strangers to be resettled in the land as it belonged to their ancestors, hence it is theirs".

Who does KE belong to is the question that comes to mind? Does the constitution provide for freedom of movement and settlement in KE without prejudice and restrictions or is our constitution a worthless piece of crap that is only good in paper for debate?