I don't think I was  assuming maybe the ISP changed something on that link

On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 4:17 PM, Tony Gacheru <tonygacheru@gmail.com> wrote:

Or the block on the lan side is managed at 2mbps

 

From: skunkworks-bounces@lists.my.co.ke [mailto:skunkworks-bounces@lists.my.co.ke] On Behalf Of Thuo Wilson
Sent: Thursday, May 08, 2014 4:13 PM
To: Skunkworks Mailing List
Subject: Re: [Skunkworks] Network Issues

 

 

On 8 May 2014 15:56, Dennis Mugaya <mudenasi@gmail.com> wrote:

ecure-server
!
ip nat inside source list 1 interface GigabitEthernet0/0 overload
ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 41.57.103.253
!
!
!
snmp-server community public RO R0
snmp-server community private RW
!

scheduler allocate 20000 1000

 

Since i don't see ACL for acl-no1 i assume you aren't using NAT but rather routed IPs - right?

 

Both IP (confirmed) pass via 2 different link; throughput may not be same. 

You could tell the provider to get you better IPs (controversial) - of the same network/provider as WAN link IPs.

You could NAT the LAN ips to WAN and test if same throughput is achieved under NAT. Just add "access-list 1 permit 41.57.104.16  0.0.0.15

 

 

Kind Regards,

Wilson./

_______________________________________________
skunkworks mailing list
skunkworks@lists.my.co.ke
------------
List info, subscribe/unsubscribe
http://lists.my.co.ke/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/skunkworks
------------

Skunkworks Rules
http://my.co.ke/phpbb/viewtopic.php?f=24&t=94
------------
Other services @ http://my.co.ke

--

Dennis Mugaya
Network Administrator
Moi Teaching & Referral Hospital

_______________________________________________
skunkworks mailing list
skunkworks@lists.my.co.ke
------------
List info, subscribe/unsubscribe
http://lists.my.co.ke/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/skunkworks
------------

Skunkworks Rules
http://my.co.ke/phpbb/viewtopic.php?f=24&t=94
------------
Other services @ http://my.co.ke