Their sources of information are different... and I think wikipedia was designed with that in mind.

 that why I wouldn't call it a 1:1,

--
Josiah Mugambi

On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 1:34 PM, Phares Kariuki <pkariuki@gmail.com> wrote:

@Phares - that's not a 1:1 comparison :)

True. Using a slightly flawed comparison model, Britannica looks better, but does not have as much content as Wikipedia, hence the latter's popularity. Basically, if beauty ruled, the former would have more hits...

--
With Regards,

Phares Kariuki

| T: +254 734 810 802 | E: pkariuki@gmail.com | Twitter: kaboro | Skype: kariukiphares |

_______________________________________________
Skunkworks mailing list
Skunkworks@lists.my.co.ke
http://lists.my.co.ke/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/skunkworks
------------
Skunkworks Server donations spreadsheet
http://spreadsheets.google.com/ccc?key=0AopdHkqSqKL-dHlQVTMxU1VBdU1BSWJxdy1fbjAwOUE&hl=en
------------
Skunkworks Rules
http://my.co.ke/phpbb/viewtopic.php?f=24&t=94
------------
Other services @ http://my.co.ke

_______________________________________________
Skunkworks mailing list
Skunkworks@lists.my.co.ke
http://lists.my.co.ke/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/skunkworks
------------
Skunkworks Server donations spreadsheet
http://spreadsheets.google.com/ccc?key=0AopdHkqSqKL-dHlQVTMxU1VBdU1BSWJxdy1fbjAwOUE&hl=en
------------
Skunkworks Rules
http://my.co.ke/phpbb/viewtopic.php?f=24&t=94
------------
Other services @ http://my.co.ke