Hmmmmmm, never thought of it that way. But if an individual obtained a patent to prevent a big player from muzzling him out, does that justify patents?

On Sun, Nov 15, 2009 at 8:14 AM, Gakuru Alex <alexgakuru.lists@gmail.com> wrote:
On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 11:35 AM, saidimu apale <saidimu@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> The myth of big pharma spending billions on research, hence the need to protect their legitimate investments by hook is crook is... just a myth.

See Robin D. Gross,

“One of the most common misunderstandings regarding intellectual
property rights, particularly copyright, is that the actual creators
are the main beneficiaries of the grant. In reality, it is the large
companies that employ creators and then strip them of their copyright
through contracts who actually benefit from the grant society intended
as a reward for authors.

This important misunderstanding is no accident. Misleading "romantic
notions of authorship" are systematically spun by the companies who
stand in the shoes of creators to justify the generous monopoly right
rewarded to them”, http://www.imaginelaw.com/



--
www.golavish.com - The travel and leisure
www.raccuddasys.com - code Development issues