"...can a really pissed company sue..." its within their rights to sue, but it wouldn't really go anywhere. when a couple hundred techies find faults with your services/products, there is surely some truth in there. dragging them to court (ignore the logistics of that for now) would simply draw attention to said_company and the issues at hand. not a good thing. sueing skw would be shooting themselves in BOTH feet, so to speak. //my 0.2// On 6/23/10, [ Brainiac ] <arebacollins@gmail.com> wrote:
Call me a conspiration theorist, but i feel that skunkworks is becoming more of a threat to many guys in the industry, more because as a tech community, we are able to highlight the errors that many companies have ridden on to squander innocent clients. For that role, we have succeeded with sterling marks. Im curious though, as a forum, what are the risks? just wondering.....
can a really pissed company sue and enjoin everyone in the list? Does what we post on the list pose a risk of any sort. Im just wondering if a comment made agains this or that company could be used in a defamation case or something.
Is it possible to have terms and conditions that explicitly state that we are discussing this in good faith, and better still, could some lawyer skunk advise if it is possible to have, in the terms and conditions something that basically makes us immune to unneccessary litigation?
-- Posted on 100% recycled electrons
-- ------------------------------ <you may be right, i may be crazy, but it just may be a lunatic you're looking for> ------------------------------ t: #error: <no carrier> e: motobaridi@motobaridi.com