Or the block on the lan side is managed at 2mbps From: skunkworks-bounces@lists.my.co.ke [mailto:skunkworks-bounces@lists.my.co.ke] On Behalf Of Thuo Wilson Sent: Thursday, May 08, 2014 4:13 PM To: Skunkworks Mailing List Subject: Re: [Skunkworks] Network Issues On 8 May 2014 15:56, Dennis Mugaya <mudenasi@gmail.com> wrote: ecure-server ! ip nat inside source list 1 interface GigabitEthernet0/0 overload ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 41.57.103.253 ! ! ! snmp-server community public RO R0 snmp-server community private RW ! scheduler allocate 20000 1000 Since i don't see ACL for acl-no1 i assume you aren't using NAT but rather routed IPs - right? Both IP (confirmed) pass via 2 different link; throughput may not be same. You could tell the provider to get you better IPs (controversial) - of the same network/provider as WAN link IPs. You could NAT the LAN ips to WAN and test if same throughput is achieved under NAT. Just add "access-list 1 permit 41.57.104.16 0.0.0.15 Inline images 2 Inline images 1 Kind Regards, Wilson./
