I only read the first sentence. Goodbye.

On Jun 11, 2011 5:06 PM, "aki" <aki275@gmail.com> wrote:
> In a final contribution to this list as I'm finding it difficult to spare
> time, I want to leave some thoughts for your reading. When you look at each
> and every sector, 99% is based on imports whether in raw materials or
> machinery or even code systems. While this suits 99% of everyone out there
> who basically is trying to survive to make it, when we ourselves try to get
> down to the atom level what we discover is the remains of very bad and
> failed policies. There is no room for going against a defective planning and
> faulty system, and most who try and make it to the atom level will
> find themselves completely isolated and out of place.
>
> With the Tech Park as an example we are once again proving that while there
> is plenty to gain from* positive globalization*, we will get the raw end of
> the deal which is *negative globalization* in the long term. History repeats
> itself again, and we still do not learn but gladly jump into the global
> torrents that we have no control over. Ask any investor in Dubai what
> happened over the last global meltdown, and they will not have anything good
> to say. Ask yourself why has there never been a strong policy to produce,
> manufacture and research at the core levels but there has been a strong
> drive to put up concrete structures to create other environments? Ask
> yourself why no accountant, doctor nor lawyer has greatly impacted the atom
> levels of the core in any country? The local representatives of developing
> economies have had a game plan for many years. They never want any
> specialized knowledge to thrive in their environments. For many years, they
> have controlled how the demand and supply has existed. They have written
> the economy to match and control of how its citizens think and act. They
> want microfinaces to succeed but will not touch the mainstream banks on
> borrowing rates where borrowing hardly meets any profitability
> expectations. There can never be a supply of bright creative minds at the
> lowest levels of creations because this will upset the balance of
> supply/demand from external resources. This, listers, is the doom of
> developing countries. Only when you go down to the lowest iota of the atom
> is when you realise what is going on.
>
> So the castration of the creative brains start with these words " why
> re-invent a wheel? " and has been successfully entrenched into the system
> through various means. The wheels are easily at an an email, download,
> fax or bank transfer distance. The pressure and urge to succeed quickly and
> without much effort further justifies the means. No one can blame you or me
> for thinking such things as the system demands it, but just look at why it
> is not necessary to re-invent the wheel? For yourself or for others?
>
> Success to all those who are still tinkering with the atoms and structure of
> technology out there and to everyone also making a living out of other
> wheels. No one can help it, its the system.
>
> Some amatuer thots, and keep intouch later. :-)
>
> Rgds.