I agree fully, its only the enforcement part and support that would be a nightmare. -----Original Message----- From: Odhiambo Washington <odhiambo@gmail.com> Reply-to: Skunkworks Mailing List <skunkworks@lists.my.co.ke> To: Skunkworks Mailing List <skunkworks@lists.my.co.ke> Subject: Re: [Skunkworks] Blacklisted mail servers Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2010 09:44:10 +0300 2010/4/30 Alex Kamiru <nderitualex@gmail.com> Dynamic hosts should never be allowed to "behave" as mail servers. These hosts are not servers, they are just users with outlook configured with outgoing mail servers as the relay servers of their providers such as mail.gprs.safaricom.com for Safaricom 3G users, which is the case now I believe. So mail.gprs.safaricom.com is just like another server on some "LAN" and should also enforce submission via 587. Should take care of worms that bypass Outlook configuration, I believe. In fact they should use some other non-standard ports:) -- Best regards, Odhiambo WASHINGTON, Nairobi,KE +254733744121/+254722743223 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ "If you have nothing good to say about someone, just shut up!." -- Lucky Dube _______________________________________________ Skunkworks mailing list Skunkworks@lists.my.co.ke http://lists.my.co.ke/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/skunkworks ------------ Skunkworks Server donations spreadsheet http://spreadsheets.google.com/ccc?key=0AopdHkqSqKL-dHlQVTMxU1VBdU1BSWJxdy1f... ------------ Skunkworks Rules http://my.co.ke/phpbb/viewtopic.php?f=24&t=94 ------------ Other services @ http://my.co.ke