On Monday, May 6, 2013 at 4:02 PM, Christian Ledermann wrote:
As Google hires all of the world’s good software engineers and myfriends with startup companies fight over the scraps I am left towonder how everyone could have been so wrong in predicting that theworld would be glutted with good programmers and sysadmins by now.On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 3:53 PM, Tech List Kenya <techlistkenya@gmail.com> wrote:Now that am convinced I am not being considered for the post of ICT PS Imight as well comment.In my opinion, the laptop per child, if implemented in isolation will be avery irresponsible use of public funds. Why not one microscope per child?Don't we need doctors? One spanner per child (for engineers). Ridiculous buthope you get the point.I believe the priorities of anyone who wishes Kenya prosperity should be:a) Food securityb) Health Securityc) Physical securityA healthy well fed nation with peace of mind will spar growth since peoplewill get out of the hand-to-mouth cycle. I live off technology, yes, but toplace the future of the country on technology is bad planning. We shouldinstead invest everything we can to make Kenya an agriculture hub. Yes, Iknow, it's not as sexy but that will be the day Kenya will rule the region.Technology should be driven by need. How many people did IT and are workingin other fields?If we are to buy the laptops (yes, they are not FREE) let us not kidourselves it is going to sudden surge in ICT.On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 2:56 PM, Martin Chiteri <martin.chiteri@gmail.com>wrote:Hi guys,Sorry to differ again with the general opinion here. I am still notconvinced that we need to give kids "a hundred dollar laptops" in order tomake them learn better. My view is that children nowadays are informallytrained to use computers at a very early age, thanks to the many playstations / XBoxes and smart phones + tablet computers available throughtheir parents. I am also certain many of them get to use laptops at the sametime for the same reasons. We really need to teach children just a littlemore to make them be fully comfortable with the use of other "advanced"computing equipment.If the said "digital" dream is to be achieved by 2030, we should havealready seen the fruits of this early exposure, and I believe we already aredoing that but to smaller extents. Another thing we should really appreciateis that it took fifty years for the U.s of America to get the famous siliconvalley to the point it is at now. Maybe they had no choice, even with theirmight, to get there now since fifty years is all they had between now andthen ...... Nevertheless, let not building our "silicon savannah" be theprimary objective but the creation of a population that is capable ofclearly reasoning and fixing their own inadequacies, be it with the economy,society or technology.As @Phares among a few others indicated, we really need to tackle theproblem from another region. I really do not think the "One laptop perchild" initiative came about as a result of serious discussions between thestakeholders in the education field and other parties. If this were thecase, I suspect the actual issue with our education system could have beenclearly pointed out in another direction. By simply working with the basicslike well equipped libraries and labs, class rooms, good roads to schools,water and electricity, well trained and compensated teachers among others,good social amenities in schools, we will surely get there.Martin.On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 1:33 PM, Peter Karunyu <pkarunyu@gmail.com> wrote:@FrancisOn Mon, May 6, 2013 at 1:09 PM, Francis Njenga <korefn@gmail.com> wrote:As I read more comments, I believe we all(at least most of thecontributers) agree thatthe education system needs to be"revolutionized"/"modernized"/'Re-engineered'. The question begs:"How do we do this?"IMHO, it is incredibly difficult (not impossible) to change our educationsystem since there are so many vested interests. And even if we did manageto change it, it would take several years for the effect to be felttangibly.Some of these vested interests are:Ministry of EducationKNUTTSCTeachersParentsBook publishersOur international donors/partners/financiersStudentsOur <put here a bad word of your choice> members of parliament and senateEach one of these would form a point of resistance in the implementationof the change in our education system.The statements of @Phares make a lot sense, but I think we are lacking inone area; applying scientific methodologies to separate fact from chaff, asBitange Ndemo once implied.These questions linger in my mind:1. What change in the economy have the fiber optic cables introducedsince they were lit? Can it be measured?2. What contribution has the Thika superhighway contributed to theeconomy? Can it be measured?3. If a quarter of thika road was implemented in the heart of Kericho(assuming this is where lots of tea comes from), would the impact of this bebigger or lesser than thika road?4. Is a bigger JKIA more profitable for the economy than more milkprocessing plants in <that place where they were pouring milk>?My point is, how can we measure what each basic arm of the economycontributes to the whole?_______________________________________________skunkworks mailing list------------List info, subscribe/unsubscribe------------Skunkworks Rules------------Other services @ http://my.co.ke_______________________________________________skunkworks mailing list------------List info, subscribe/unsubscribe------------Skunkworks Rules------------Other services @ http://my.co.ke_______________________________________________skunkworks mailing list------------List info, subscribe/unsubscribe------------Skunkworks Rules------------Other services @ http://my.co.ke--Best Regards,Christian Ledermann_______________________________________________skunkworks mailing list------------List info, subscribe/unsubscribe------------Skunkworks Rules------------Other services @ http://my.co.ke