On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 3:29 AM, saidimu apale <saidimu@gmail.com> wrote:
I think that apart from it seeming like a microsoft sales pitch, it was so
much more informative
Full disclosure might be helpful (who is funding, your affiliation with them, potential conflicts of interest etc etc).
I wanted to present something remotely, if the facilities exist (primarily bandwidth). Maybe next time.
Saidi
On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 10:11 AM, Eva Kimathi <evakimathi@gmail.com>wrote:
I think that apart from it seeming like a microsoft sales pitch, it was so much more informative. if i may speak for myself, i think it was positively enlightening. I would attend another one....I am just saying'.....
http://monty-says.blogspot.com/2009/09/codeplex-foundation-why-is-microsoft.... We cannot ignore FOSS on Windows Server Systems. There have been queries on skunkworks about how to instal PHP (Joomla) on Windows in the Enterprise. There are ASP.Net developers needing to embed Google Earth in their Apps. http://blog.evonet.com.au/post/Integrating-Google-Maps-into-an-ASPNET-page.a... Developers who want to be irrelevant in the Enterprise can ignore Microsoft technologies. Why have Google, Apple & Nokia licensed Microsoft Active Sync? To connect some of their services and (or) to Microsoft Exchange Servers? Is this is not Industrial Realism? So we are going to continue addressing Windows Server Systems without ignoring FOSS Systems & Standards either. If attendees do not PRESENT their FOSS preferences then ..