21 Nov
2011
21 Nov
'11
10:25 a.m.
Gentlemen, thank you for your inputs. As we go deeper into this discussion, my assessment puts the GPLv1 as truly FSF and GPLv2/v3 were meant to improve on the loop holes that GPLv1 did not want to as it fell outside the reasons for Uhuru Software. Version 2/3 meant to create commercial platforms that were looking at a market share, not consumer benefit as is FSF GPLv1. When I write these, my view point is from a developer's opinion as we learn further. So far, commercially versus consumers, I'd say that OSS is really the Hyena. This brief really shows what is happening in the software market : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6xh2YpA1JzE As usual corrections are welcome. :-)