I wonder whether it can be argued that this incident could be accounted as "force majeure" which can be described using the following elements: Externality: The defendant must have nothing to do with the event's happening. Unpredictability: If the event could be foreseen, the defendant is obligated to have prepared for it.[4] Being unprepared for a foreseeable event leaves the defendant culpable. This standard is very strictly applied Irresistibility: The consequences of the event must have been unpreventable. Best regards, Brian On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 1:21 PM, aki <aki275@gmail.com> wrote:
@Areba, If CCK has not implemented a license plan that provides and meets stringent conditions for Telecommunication Operators to adhere to, and in the matter of emergencies and redundancies, we are at a complete loss. The current situation would show further why there in no need to have local domains that are now not reachable via external traffic. Not only will the local domain be high restricted but mostly unavailable for the next 3 weeks from external requests.
Rgds. :-)
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 1:00 PM, Collins Areba <arebacollins@gmail.com> wrote:
im curious, @aki how would you have wanted them respond to this?
_______________________________________________ Skunkworks mailing list Skunkworks@lists.my.co.ke ------------ List info, subscribe/unsubscribe http://lists.my.co.ke/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/skunkworks ------------
Skunkworks Rules http://my.co.ke/phpbb/viewtopic.php?f=24&t=94 ------------ Other services @ http://my.co.ke
-- Brian Munyao Longwe e-mail: blongwe@gmail.com cell: +254715964281 blog : http://zinjlog.blogspot.com meta-blog: http://mashilingi.blogspot.com "Give us clear vision that we may know where to stand and what to stand for, because unless we stand for something, we shall fall for anything."