Hi @Steve, :-) inline below.
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 4:43 PM, aki <aki275@gmail.com> wrote:Aki,
> @Dennis, IMHO. This and all other useless-belong in the garbage tin- Open
> Source egde security systems cannot handle "dark networks", ever followed
Previously I've successfully blocked P2P, skype and bittorent traffic
using pure open-source - DPI with application-level signature
detection using Snort, feeding rules to iptables on Linux. I know it
works even better now than it did then. And that's not the only way it
can be done, open-source.
That was ages ago, mostly for fun and is definitely not the way Tusker
wants to go. He's indicated that he needs a easy-to manage,
well-supported commercial solution.
Bad idea. Not at the core.
> There is a special need, and this need can only be partly implemented at
> core networks as an ISP or Gateways.
>
> Edge solutions can even simply run on a cisco router ALCs, why force end
> users to add other products?
Back in my ISP days we had ACLs that blocked well-known bad traffic -
NetBIOS, known worms etc. at the edge. But you'd just pointed out -
correctly - that such traffic will get around ACLs.
The answer is managed services for customers who want their traffic
managed for them - and this at a fee. Where the device that handles
this sits, is debatable. Should be it a CPE? Maybe. Or somewhere in
the provider network? I can't say. Some customers don't want the ISP
to touch their traffic.
One size doesn't fit all.
Regards,
Steve
_