July 2009 - skunkworks - Skunkworks Site

solid waste management programme
by Ruth Kipaty 19 Jul '09

19 Jul '09

there was talk of the above. What came of it?

2 1

HP Proliant ML110 Server.Anyone interested?
by Collins Emadau 19 Jul '09

19 Jul '09

The following model of HP ProLiant ML110 G5 Server series are available for sale. Below are the specifications Processor: E2160 (1.80 GHz, 65W, 800MHz FSB, 1MB); Intel Dual Core Processor.Intel® 3200 Chipset RAM: 1 GB RAM Expandable to 8GB PC2-6400 unbuffered DDR2 ECC 800MHz HDD and RAID: 250 GB SATA 7200 rpm Hard Drive with Internal SATA (Non-hot plug): 3.0 TB (4 x 750 GB) capability.SATA Models: Integrated 6 port SATA controller with embedded RAID (4 available for Hard Disks) ROM Drive: SATA DVD-ROM Drive Expansion Slots: Slot 1: PCI 32-bit/33MHz at 3.3V; Slot 2: PCI-Express x8 connector with x1 link; Slot 3: PCI-Express x8 connector with x1 link; Slot 4: PCI-Express X8 connector with x8 link Network Card: Embedded NC105i PCI Express Gigabit Ethernet Server Adapter Operating Systems: Compatible with Microsoft® Windows® Server; Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL); SUSE Linux Enterprise Server (SLES); Netware and others Form Factor: Micro ATX Tower (4U) The server(s) is available for delivery within 2hrs, if you are based in Nairobi and 24hrs if out of Nairobi for Kshs 47K negotiable. Get in touch with me off-list on this address: emadauidewa(a)gmail.com or 0723542064. Best Regards Collins Idewa Emadau P.O.BOX 62689 - 00200, City Square,Nairobi. KENYA. emadauidewa(a)gmail.com +254723542064 Do what you can,with what you have,where you are-Roosvelt

1 0

chekelea.com
by aki 18 Jul '09

18 Jul '09

Gd morning, I've setup a Tech Knowledge Base page for quick references. Want to add skunks links or links to bb on it. Permission granted? Cheers.

2 7

Broadband users reach their limit
by Murigi Muraya 18 Jul '09

18 Jul '09

http://newsvote.bbc.co.uk/mpapps/pagetools/print/news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/techno… Broadband users reach their limit * One million UK consumers have exceeded or come close to exceeding their broadband usage limit, research from consumer group uSwitch has found. * So-called usage caps, where internet service providers limit the amount of bandwidth users can have in any given month, are standard practice...... ____________ http://themediaguru.blogspot.com/2008/05/orange-fair-usage-policy-update.ht… http://www.geekscribes.net/blog/2008/05/23/orange-faq-updated-more-details-… http://www.geekscribes.net/blog/2009/02/27/orange-mauritus-adsl-myt-prices-… http://www.orange.mu/internet/faqs.php 1.8 what are the available speed for surfing? ADSL is available at 256kbps, 512kbps, 1 Mbps, 2 Mbps. 1.13 can my family and I surf simultaneously on more than one PC/laptop? Yes, you can have internet access simultaneously on more than 1 PC and laptop. However, your surf experience ie. speed on each PC will depend on the ADSL package you have subscribed to.

1 0

Orange UK
by Murigi Muraya 18 Jul '09

18 Jul '09

http://www.orange.co.uk/time/broadbandstarter/ http://www.orange.co.uk/time/broadbandselect/ http://shop.orange.co.uk/shop/home-and-mobile-broadband

1 0

Is ICANN Accountable to the Global Public Interest? ICANN Ignores Non-Commercial Users in Internet Policy Development Process
by Gakuru Alex 18 Jul '09

18 Jul '09

Dear All, This message is very important to every user. Please forward it as widely as possible to all end-users of the internet. Help steer ICANN away from it a path that threatens users online presence, globally. Send your comments to gnso-stakeholder-charters(a)icann.org today to remind ICANN who they work for. Act Now!! Deadline is next Tuesday 21 July, 2009 Regards, Alex Gakuru NCUC - Kenya --------- Below is a blog post on the tragedy of the ICANN NCSG charter situation. See numerous hyperlinks for further background reading at: http://ipjustice.org/ICANN/NCSG/NCUC-ICANN-Injustices.html ________________________ Is ICANN Accountable to the Global Public Interest? ICANN Ignores Non-Commercial Users in Internet Policy Development Process By Robin D. Gross, IP Justice 13 July 2009 ----------------------------------------- Everyone is a Noncommercial User of the Internet NCUC logoThe Non-Commercial Users Constituency (NCUC) is the home to noncommercial users in ICANN's GNSO policy development process. NCUC represents 109 members from more than 40 countries, and includes large organizations, small nonprofits and individuals committed to developing Internet policy that protects the rights of noncommercial users. NCUC is concerned with a broad range of issues including human rights such as freedom of expression and privacy protections, educational needs such as those of libraries or academic institutions, and concerns from community and religious organizations, consumer rights groups, and other noncommercial interests related to Internet governance. In today's world, everyone is a noncommercial user of the Internet at one point of their day or another. This noncommercial interest, is an important interest which we all share, regardless of what we do for a living or the fact that we also use the Internet for commercial purposes. We are also noncommercial users and want our ability and right to use the Internet for noncommercial purposes to be protected in ICANN policy negotiations. This objective is in everyone's interest, so it should be respected throughout ICANN's policy development process and governance structures. Restructuring ICANN's GNSO Policy Development Framework ICANN's Generic Names Supporting Organizations (GNSO) is the supposedly "bottom-up" process that allegedly provides ICANN with legitimacy to make and enforce Internet policy decisions. ICANN's GNSO is responsible for making policy recommendations to ICANN's Board of Directors regarding policies covering all generic top-level domains (such as .com, .edu, .org, .net). Presently GNSO policy recommendations are negotiated among competing interests or 6 distinct "constituencies". However, the GNSO is the process of restructuring and reforming its membership away from 6 arbitrary and out-dated "constituencies" and into 4 distinct "stakeholder groups": i) noncommercial users; ii) commercial users; iii) registrar companies; and iv) registry companies. Board Appointed (top-down) vs. Elected (bottom-up) Represent ion on GNSO Council Noncommercial users have been fighting for years to obtain parity with commercial users in the GNSO policy development process at ICANN. A 2006 report by the London School of Economics found ICANN undervalues noncommercial interests in the policy development process (5 specialized commercial constituencies vs. 1 noncommercial constituency to represent all noncommercial interests). In February 2008 the Board Governance Committee Report also recognized this imbalance and the need to address it in order to protect noncommercial interests in ICANN policy development. As a result, the ICANN Board approved a major shift for ICANN's GNSO by deciding noncommercial users should finally be given parity with commercial users in the GNSO policy development process. Specifically, beginning with the Seoul ICANN Meeting in October 2009, noncommercial users and commercial users are each supposed to have elected 6 representatives to the GNSO Council. However, as a result of back channel lobbying by the commercial constituencies who lost the advantage in numbers of councilors, the 3 new GNSO Council seats that should have gone up for election to noncommercial users, will instead become board appointments. Despite the lack of any support from ICANN, NCUC's membership has grown by more than 125% since 2008 when parity between commercial and noncommercial interests was established by the Board Governance Committee. Yet despite the significant increase in participation from noncommercial users, the "parity principle" has lost support from the board, who now may deny the new noncommercial membership elected representation on the GNSO Council. Development of Consensus for Charter for Noncommercial Stakeholder Group (NCSG) In April 2009 noncommercial users responded to ICANN's call for public comment on how to design a stakeholder group charter to maximize the effectiveness of noncommercial users in policy development and encourage the broadest range of participation from the most diverse viewpoints. The answer was clear: noncommercial users overwhelmingly supported a stakeholder group charter that encourages cooperation between constituencies, the charter proposed by the NCUC. NCUC's charter was developed by a multi-stakeholder process that involved months of open consultations, dozens of participants, numerous discussions with ICANN board and staff, At-Large members, existing noncommercial participants at ICANN and prospective noncommercial participants. NCUC's charter went through significant modifications in response to public feedback, including more than half a dozen distinct public drafts, before reaching a consensus on the final charter submitted for a Non-Commercial Stakeholder Group (NCSG). In addition to NCUC's membership, ICANN's public comment period on the stakeholder group charters brought additional support to the NCUC charter, including support from over 63 organizations and dozens of individuals from all corners of the globe. Public Comment Against a Charter that Would Stranglehold Noncommercial Users Two competing proposals, vastly different in their substance and effect, were submitted to ICANN to charter the new Noncommercial Stakeholder Group (NCSG). In addition to the charter supported by civil society from NCUC, another proposal was submitted from CP80, an Internet pro-censorship group led by Cheryl Preston, Ralph Yarro III (SCO Chairman), and Debra Peck out of Salt Lake City, Utah. Outside from the drafters of the CP80 petition, not a single public comment argued in support of the CP80 proposal or its governance model during ICANN's Public Comment Period. The lack of public support for the CP80 "constituency-based" voting model is not surprising since its provisions would stranglehold noncommercial users in endless competition among factionalized constituencies, constantly fighting over scarce resources and representation on ICANN's GNSO Council. NCUC's charter encourages noncommercial users to work together toward shared goals, while the CP80 model keeps noncommercial users constantly fighting over their differences, and ultimately ineffective at influencing policy decisions at ICANN. Noncommercial Organizations Unanimous in Favor of Joint Civil Society Proposal During ICANN's April 2009 Public Comment period, a total of 23 distinct comments from organizations and individuals were submitted on the topic of stakeholder group charters. Several of these comments were signed by dozens of noncommercial organizations and individuals, increasing public participation by much more than 23 comments would initially imply. However of these 23 comments, the only 2 to argue in favor of the CP80 proposal to hard-wire GNSO Council Seats to constituencies were the drafters of the proposal themselves. No one else. As many commentators noted, CP80's proposed "constituency-based" structure would stranglehold noncommercial users and discourage consensus building and cooperation among competing constituencies. The "constituency-based" voting it proposes creates a constant zero-sum struggle between noncommercial constituencies, rendering the entire Non-Commercial Stakeholder Group ineffective in ICANN policy development. In stark contrast to the lack of any support for the CP80 model, more than 63 organizations and 55 individuals submitted comments in favor of the joint civil society charter that provides for a democratic vote of all its membership to elect representatives to serve on the GNSO Council. Every single noncommercial organization who submitted a public comment on the topic argued against the stranglehold charter model proposed by CP80 and in favor of the cooperation charter submitted by noncommercial users and created through a consensus process. ICANN Defies Public Comment and Imposes Stranglehold Charter Model What did ICANN do in response to the public comment it received and the global consensus against the stranglehold charter model proposed by CP80? ICANN adopted the stranglehold charter model for noncommercial users, defying the unanimous public support expressed for the charter drafted by noncommercial users that was created through a consensus process. Welcome to "bottom-up" policy making at ICANN: where participants are invited to build a "consensus" among a broad range of interests, only to have that consensus discarded by ICANN as a result of relentless insider back-channel lobbying from special interests. Apparently we noncommercial users wasted our time building consensus among global civil society and participating in a public discussion forum, when we should have been lobbying ICANN board members and ICANN executive staffers -- since that seems to be the only channel of public input ICANN feels accountable to. Obviously, noncommercial users will never be able to effectively participate in a policy development forum that is predicated on and dominated by insider lobbying from entrenched commercial interests. ICANN's Board of Directors has a responsibility to the global public interest to ensure noncommercial interests can play a meaningful role in ICANN policy development despite its lack of economic backing. Unfortunately protection for noncommercial interests is systematically being squeezed-out of ICANN's policy development process by commercial interests. ICANN's Sneaky Move to Keep Plans Hidden On 23 June 2009, when ICANN finally released its proposed charter to noncommercial users, in addition to the charter being an entirely different different structure than the one created by the consensus process, ICANN's charter also omitted to include the most important section 5 which deals with management of the NCSG and in particular, representation on the GNSO Policy Council. Only after explicitly requesting to see the omitted section, was NCUC provided section 5 from ICANN with the understanding that it is staff's proposal for governing the NCSG. One will not find ICANN's proposed section 5 in its NCSG charter published on the ICANN website, but it can read be read here -- and it must be read together with the ICANN-drafted NCSG charter for it be clear what sneakiness is at play. Exactly the stranglehold governance structure that noncommercial users uniformly rejected in April, ICANN intends to march ahead with at full steam and impose on noncommercial users. But not transparently and not in a manner that conveys its clear intentions to the public so those effected may provide feedback. When asked at the 23 June 2009 ICANN meeting why didn't staff listen to non-commercial users in the public comment period about how they want to elect their GNSO Council Representatives, ICANN spokesman Ken Bour frankly said that ICANN staff adopted the constituency-based charter "because it is what staff wanted all along". Tell ICANN to Listen to Noncommercial Users and Protect the Public Interest The message is clear. ICANN has forgotten who it works for - us - Internet users - including noncommercial users. Now is the time to remind ICANN that it must be accountable to the global public interest or it has no business in Internet governance. Tell ICANN to listen to noncommercial users and not to impose the stranglehold charter on noncommercial users against our will. Send an email to gnso-stakeholder-charters(a)icann.org (until 21 July 2009) and ask that noncommercial voices be heard in Internet policy decisions. Send a copy of your comment to your local Congressman or Member of Parliament to keep them informed about ICANN injustices to noncommercial users. You can also file a complaint over ICANN injustices with the ombudsman, who is supposed to keep the organization accountable to the public. Thomas Jefferson noted that the exercise of political power without the consent of the governed is illegitimate. ICANN's attempt to impose a governance structure on noncommercial users against their will calls into question ICANN's legitimacy to govern; it undermines confidence in ICANN's commitment to democratic values; and it appears ICANN is unable to protect the broader public interest against commercial pressures. We must remind ICANN to protect the public interest and the rights of noncommercial users - all of us. Send a quick email to gnso-stakeholder-charters(a)icann.org today to remind ICANN who they work for. IP JUSTICE Robin Gross, Executive Director 1192 Haight Street, San Francisco, CA 94117 USA p: +1-415-553-6261 f: +1-415-462-6451 w: http://www.ipjustice.org e: robin(a)ipjustice.org _______________________________________________ ke-internetusers mailing list ke-internetusers(a)bdix.net http://www.bdix.net/mailman/listinfo/ke-internetusers

1 0

HELP! MSFT expert. Outlook 2007 + Server 2003 for small businesses
by Al Kags 18 Jul '09

18 Jul '09

So my new laptop has Vista and Outlook 2007. i was trying to set my email up and when it came to defining server, I went ahead and placed the info that I have - server name and my name... Error comes: "The name cannot be resolved. The microsoft exchange server is unavailable. Outlook must be connected or online to complete this action." - OK. Then it says "cannot open your default mail folders. the file c:\users\Al Kags\Appdata\Local\microsoft\outlook\outlook.pst" is not an offline folder file." Then it closes. When I reopen outlook, I go through the same. Tried to follow the instructions for a workaround as per this MSFT site: http://support.microsoft.com/kb/913843 problem is, in my registry there is no RPC in here: HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Microsoft\Office\12.0\Outlook\RPC !!!! At my wits end. Who knows what to do? Al Kags ----------------------- Founder, The Desturi Trust http://www.alkags.com

2 4

Re: [Skunkworks] Bandwidth
by Rahim Kara 18 Jul '09

18 Jul '09

Does anyone really provide 128KB/s in Kenya or is it all just a load of Bull? Were just testing the new service from a provider ( NO Names given ) who claim to hand us a 128KB/S Fibre connection and i'm downloading at 10Kb/s. I've trying understanding what the logic of this situation is. I've also tried to figure out whether there's a contention here that i should be considering but i called the support line and got this as an answer. You are on the 128 KiloByte Fiber Line. I can relate if this is being referred to as the connection between me and the service provider. I explained this to him as well. I also asked him whether we were connected to him with a 128 KB line and thereafter having to share the connection with a multitude of users. His response was one and one alone. You're on a one to one contention, we don't allow sharing between you and us. I again tried to explain to him that with a one to one contention between him and me, it wouldn't make a difference if after getting to his server / router, my bandwidth was being rationed. He stood firm in his argument. I ran a bandwidth test on CNET, got a 109 kb/s which i would like to believe is Kilo Bits / s not KiloBytes. If someone ( I Believe alot of people do ) has a clearer view on this, please shed some light. I am a lost sheep at the moment. Rahim Kara, Pro App's Specialist, Elite Digital Solutions Ltd.  Apple Premium Reseller Sarit Centre P.O.Box 75289, Nairobi – 00200 KENYA +254 (20) 374 5550 PHONE +254 (20) 375 3509 FAX +254 721 875 042 Safaricom MOBILE +254 734 334 074 Zain MOBILE +254 773 104 250 Orange MOBILE iChat rahim.kara(a)me.com Mailing List Subscription http://mail.wananchi.com/mailman/listinfo/elitedigitalsolutions

8 10

AccessKenya upgrades its internet core network
by aki 18 Jul '09

18 Jul '09

AccessKenya Group has upgraded its internet core network by ten times as it gears to handle the huge bandwidth capacity upon the arrival of the Seacom and Teams submarine cables. AceesKenya increased the internet core network from1000mb to 10000mb at a cost of Sh60 million. It is scaled to handle and best manage the large capacities of the international fibre cables and to ensure the core internet network is upgrade proofed for a number of years into the future. Additionally, the company has purchased 2500mb of capacity on the Seacom fibre optic cable, which together with a similar amount procured on the TEAMS cable will give it a total of 5000mb of capacity to offer significantly faster speeds to its customers. Currently, the entire country currently purchases 1,200mb on satellite. AccessKenya will therefore have more than 4 times the capacity that the whole of Kenya currently uses, and will retain its place as the largest bandwidth buyer in Kenya http://www.businessdailyafrica.com/Company%20Industry/-/539550/624928/-/u90…

9 8

Periodic table: Element number 107 is finally named...
by Areba Collins 17 Jul '09

17 Jul '09

and with a very "lord of the rings"-ish. name: Corpenicum. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/8153596.stm Was hoping "areba-ium" sounds deadlier..... guess ill have to wait for 113. Areba. -- If you have an apple and I have an apple and we exchange these apples then you and I will still each have one apple. But if you have an idea and I have an idea and we exchange these ideas, then each of us will have two ideas. George Bernard Shaw

1 0