Dominance issue in the Telco sector
Listers An analysis on the dominance issue with case studies across the world. 1 The Kenya Information and Communications (Amendment) Act 2013 The Kenya Information and Communications (Amendment) Act 2013 (the Act) states In Section 84W (3) that Communications Authority of Kenya (the Authority) may, by notice in the Gazette, declare a person or institution to be a “dominant telecommunications service provider” for the purposes of this Act. Section 84W (4) goes further to clarify what the Authority should consider in declaring an operator or institution dominant in subsection (4) as follow: - (a) the market share of the telecommunications service provider being at least fifty percentum of the relevant gross market segment; (b) the level of control over the communications infrastructure; (c) the level of technological advancement of the telecommunications service provider; (d) the scale of operations of the telecommunications service The Authority further developed Supplementary Legislation cited as the Kenya Information and Communications (Fair Competition and Equality of Treatment) Regulations, 2010 “the Regulations”. The Regulations indicate in section 7(1) that the Authority shall from time to time develop and publish, in the Kenya Gazette, guidelines to be followed when determining whether a licensee in a dominant market position in a specific communications market but this is not a precondition to determining an Institution as being dominant and therefore the Authority is mandated to declare an operator dominant under the current available Primary and secondary legislation. In regards to Dominance, the Regulations in Section 7 (2) and (3) further mentions additional criteria for deciding on dominance which include among others— (a) the degree of market concentration or the market share of the licensee, determined by reference to revenues, numbers of subscribers or volumes of sales; (b) the degree to which a licensee’s prices vary over time; (c) the ability of the licensee to maintain or erect barriers to entry to the market, including, by means of control of essential facilities, access to superior technology, privileged access to resources or capital markets or superior buying or negotiating position, amongst others; (d) the ability of the licensee to earn supernormal profits; (e) the global technology and commercial trends affecting market power; (f) the licensee’s power to make independent rate setting decisions; (g) the degree of product or service differentiation and sales promotion in the market; and (h) any other matters which the Commission may consider relevant. Section 7 (3) A licensee shall be in a dominant market position if; (a) it has the ability to materially raise prices without suffering a commensurate loss in service demand to other licensees; (b) it has the ability to erect or benefit from barriers to market entry; (c) the Commission has so determined a dominant market power report, after considering the circumstances and criteria set in these Regulations. In reference to the legal instruments cited above, the Authority has the mandate to declare an Institution dominant and our submission is dependent on these cited instruments to make a case for determining Safaricom as a being dominant in the Mobile Retail Voice, Data, SMS market and also in the Mobile Money Transfer markets. 2 The Relevant Market Segment In line with best practice worldwide and also based on previous market study done by PWC in 2010 for the Authority (then CCK) it is clear and evident that the Retail Mobile Voice, Retail Mobile Data, Retail SMS and Mobile Money Transfer are relevant market segments. Our focus will therefore be on the Mobile Retail Voice, Data, SMS and Mobile Money Transfer market segments. 3 Market Dominance definition in Kenya Market Dominance in Kenya can be determined based on the Act and the Regulations as identified above in item 2 above. Whereas globally there are other considerations known, we will use what is within the regulatory instruments available in Kenya. However for completeness, the Competition Act Chapter 504 Part C section 23. Also defines as dominance as follows: - Sections 23 (1) “dominant undertaking” means an undertaking which: (a) produces, supplies, distributes or otherwise controls not less than one-half of the total goods of any description which are produced, supplied or distributed in Kenya or any substantial part thereof; or (b) provides or otherwise controls not less than one-half of the services which are rendered This definition by the Competition Act is in harmony with the definition in the Act as it refers to half of total good s which aligns to the 50% market share specified in the Act. Our submission will therefore concentrate on the criteria in the Act and Regulations (which are yet to be amended in line with the Act) together with the Competition Act. 4 A case for Declaring Safaricom Dominant 4.1 Degree of Market Concentration or Market Share The Commission through its consultation paper on the intention to declare regulated services, found that there was high market shares, concentration ratios and Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI) 5,230 on Subscriber base and 6,758 on revenues against best practice of 1,800 which was a clear demonstration of lack of effective Competition in the mobile voice termination market and hence the need for regulatory intervention to correct market failure. While we appreciate that the market shares, concentration ratios and HH index might have changed since the consultation was done, we strongly feel that the mobile voice market is not effectively competitive and hence the need for regulatory intervention by the Commission. The current HHI based on number of subscribers remains well over 4000 which is still double the threshold for a concentrated market. The HHI thresholds in US and EU are defined as follows: - HHI below 1000 – a competitive market. There are no dominant competitors in this market. HHI between 1000 and 1800 – a moderately concentrated market HHI above 1800 – a concentrated market. There are one or more dominant competitors in this market. This HHI though not reflected as a requirement to determine dominance in the Kenya goes to reinforce our submission that Safaricom is dominant. Safaricom’s market share has remained over 63% on the basis of mobile subscribers as can be seen from Table 2 and 78 % in traffic volumes for the period of January to March 2014. In terms of revenues it is about 80%. These figures are above the threshold that would lead to a rebuttable presumption of dominance. In established competition cases and also in line with the Competition Act chapter 504 in Kenya, sustained market shares of over 50% gives rise to a rebuttable presumption of dominance, while market shares of over 40% are suggestive of possibility of dominance. On the basis of market share alone, Safaricom holds a position of Dominance in retail voice, Retail Data, SMS and Mobile Money market and should be declared dominant. As per data provided below and also slide 30 in SFC H1 ’15 presentation, SFC holds: 68%, 78%, 97% and 72% market shares in subscribers, voice minutes, SMS traffic and data users. Moreover, they control 88% of total revenues of the market. (See extracts below) In summary, Safaricom has retained highest market shares as follows: - Market share by Subscription (voice) 80% in 2010 to 68% in 2014 Market share by Subscription (Data) 99% in 2010 to 71% in 2014 Market Share by Voice Minutes (Voice) 80% in 2012 to 79% in 2014 Market Share by number of SMS (SMS) 84% in 2012 to 96% in 2014 Market Share by Revenues (Voice) 86% in 2012 to 88% in 2014 well over 80% market share in each Mobile voice, SMS and Mobile Data 4.1.1 Market Shares by Subscriptions Number Mobile Subscriptions per Operator in Millions Month Safaricom Ltd Airtel Networks Kenya Ltd Telkom Kenya Ltd Essar Telecom (K) Ltd Totals 2009/10 16.24 1.83 0.55 1.49 20.12 2010/11 17.35 3.61 2.73 1.58 25.28 2011/12 19.01 4.91 3.12 2.66 29.70 2012/13 20.15 5.22 2.13 3.05 30.55 2013/14 21.93 5.07 2.69 2.56 32.25 Table 1: Number of mobile subscriptions since 2010 to Jun 2014 Source: Extracted from CCK/CA published reports Market Share by Subscriptions since 2010 Month Safaricom Ltd Airtel Networks Kenya Ltd Telkom Kenya Ltd Essar Telecom (K) Ltd Totals 2009/10 80.7% 9.1% 2.7% 7.4% 100% 2010/11 68.6% 14.3% 10.8% 6.3% 100% 2011/12 64.0% 16.5% 10.5% 9.0% 100% 2012/13 65.9% 17.1% 7.0% 10.0% 100% 2013/14 68.0% 15.7% 8.3% 8.0% 100% Table 2: Market Share by mobile subscriptions since 2010 Source: Extracted from CCK/CA published reports Source: Derived from Table 1 above. Chart 2: Market Share by Number of Subscriptions Mobile Data Subscriptions by Operator Operator 2009/10 2010/11 2011/12 2012/13 2013/14 Safaricom Ltd 2,959,906 3,584,283 5,262,307 9,332,995 9,974,377 Airtel Networks Kenya Ltd 10,000 496,509 1,074,764 1,597,481 1,880,644 Telkom Kenya Ltd - 108,926 674,255 795,513 1,574,168 Essar Telecom (K) Ltd - - 644,250 614,016 501,505 Totals 2,969,906 4,189,718 7,655,576 12,340,005 13,930,694 Source: Compiled from CCK/CA published reports Mobile Data Market Shares by Operator by Number of Subscriptions Operator 2009/10 2010/11 2011/12 2012/13 2013/14 Safaricom Ltd 99.7% 85.5% 68.7% 75.6% 71.6% Airtel Networks Kenya Ltd 0.3% 11.9% 14.0% 12.9% 13.5% Telkom Kenya Ltd 0.0% 2.6% 8.8% 6.4% 11.3% Essar Telecom (K) Ltd 0.0% 0.0% 8.4% 5.0% 3.6% Totals 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Mobile Data Market Share by Subscription Source: CA Reports Extracts Source: Safaricom Half-Year Results Presentation 2014/2015 4.1.2 Market Shares by Traffic or Transactions Mobile Traffic Volumes by Operator since 2012 in Billion Minutes Operator Year 2011/12 Year 2012/13 Year 2013/14 Safaricom Ltd 21.75 22.61 23.88 Airtel Networks Kenya Ltd 2.93 3.38 3.06 Telkom Kenya Ltd 0.21 0.38 0.92 Essar Telecom (K) Ltd 2.07 2.43 2.38 Totals 26.96 28.80 30.24 Source: Compiled from CCK/CA published reports Mobile Voice Minutes Market Share by Operator over a three year Period Operator Year 2011/12 Year 2012/13 Year 2013/14 Safaricom Ltd 80.7% 78.5% 79.0% Airtel Networks Kenya Ltd 10.9% 11.7% 10.1% Telkom Kenya Ltd 0.8% 1.3% 3.0% Essar Telecom (K) Ltd 7.7% 8.5% 7.9% Totals 100% 100% 100% Chart 3: Market Share by Traffic Volumes in Minutes (2013/14) The above numbers clearly supports our submission to declare Safaricom as dominant in the Retail Voice, Data and SMS market. Mobile SMS Traffic by Mobile Operator in Millions SMS’s Operator Year 2011/12 Year 2012/13 Year 2013/14 Safaricom Ltd 3,626.14 12,386.16 23,502.51 Airtel Networks Kenya Ltd 494.01 632.10 731.61 Telkom Kenya Ltd 75.02 74.25 92.35 Essar Telecom (K) Ltd 100.21 140.58 117.55 Totals 4,295 13,233 24,444 Source: Compiled from CCK/CA published reports SMS Market Shares by Operator by number of SMS’s Operator Year 2011/12 Year 2012/13 Year 2013/14 Safaricom Ltd 84% 94% 96% Airtel Networks Kenya Ltd 12% 5% 3% Telkom Kenya Ltd 2% 1% 0% Essar Telecom (K) Ltd 2% 1% 0% Totals 100% 100% 100% 5 Benchmarking – Case Studies 5.1 Dominance Declarations in African Countries Recently the Nigeria Communications Commission declared MTN Nigeria and Globacom dominant following a study conducted by KPMG Professional Services. MTN was declared dominant in two market segment-Mobile Voice Market and Wholesale leased lines and transmission capacity whereas Globacom (Nigeria’s second National Operator) was declared the leader in wholesale leased lines and transmission capacity market. In its determination, Nigeria Communications Commission found that the mobile voice market was not effectively competitive and therefore ordered MTN (which has 44% of the mobile voice market) to charge same amount for on-net and off-net calls. We further wish to share with the Authority a list of countries in Africa which have declared some mobile operators dominant. Country in Africa Name of Dominant Operator in country Market Share of Dominant Operator Year Operator declared Dominant Nigeria MTN 44% April 28, 2013 Congo B MTN Airtel 40% 38% March 2013 Niger Airtel 61.4% 2013 chad Airtel 53% 2013 Rwanda MTN 57% 2013 Burkina Faso Airtel Telmob 39.24% 38.36% 2012 Senegal Orange 62.06 % 2012 Gabon Airtel 45% 2013 We wish to highlight to the Authority that Safaricom has more market shares than most of the operators declared dominant as per the table above. We therefore request the Authority to proceed with speed to declare Safaricom dominant just like the other regulators have done in their jurisdictions. 5.2 IFT (Federal Telecommunication Institute) Mexico In early 2014 America Movil and its operating subsidiaries- Telecel (Mexico’s wireless market leader) and Telemex (the dominant fixed line player) were declared by the IFC as a dominant economic interest group in the telecommunications market. Telecel’s market share at the time stood at 69 % and Telemex’s market share stood at around 85%. The market concentration stood at 6382 points on the HHI with Mobile Market standing at 5334 point and the fixed telephony market stood at 4761 points on the HHI. According to the IFT a HHI score of more than 2000 points can affect competition. As the Authority will note the HHI scores are very much in line with the market concentration levels in Kenya. The regulator subjected them to the following regulations on the wholesale level: · Asymmetric interconnection rates · Access to passive infrastructure · Local loop unbundling · Mandatory National roaming Access The regulator subjected them to the following regulations on the retail level: · End to SIM locking of handsets · All services sold in bundles were required to be sold separately · Certain retail prices were to be reviewed. 5.3 Summary of obligations Imposed on Dominant Operators in other countries The following is a summary of Dominance Remedies implemented in various countries. It is important to note that Asymmetric Interconnection is one of the remedies, Account separation, infrastructure sharing and on-net/off-net equalization. Country Obligations Ghana • Accounting Separation • Collapse of On‐net and Off‐net Retail Tariffs. The tariff for on‐net and off-net will be the same, and subject to periodic review. • Submission of Required Details: The Commission may require the dominant operator to submit details on specific aspects of its operations from time to time as the need arises. • Asymmetric interconnect termination rate regime applies to new entrants as well as Operators with less than 5% of subscriber market share Gabon • Interconnection • Obligations of the quality of service, Obligation of non-discrimination transparency; • Publication of the catalog of infrastructure sharing; • Accounting separation obligation and duty on the cost accounting of all benefits Nigeria • Collapsed of on-net and off-net retail tariffs to discourage calling club effect; • Accounts Separation; Mexico • Asymmetric interconnection rates • Access to passive infrastructure • Local loop unbundling • Mandatory National roaming Access • End to SIM locking of handsets • All services sold in bundles were required to be sold separately • Certain retail prices were to be reviewed. Ali Hussein +254 770 906375 / 0713 601113 Twitter: @AliHKassim Skype: abu-jomo LinkedIn: http://ke.linkedin.com/in/alihkassim Blog: www.alyhussein.com "I fear the day technology will surpass human interaction. The world will have a generation of idiots". ~ Albert Einstein Sent from my iPad
Ali, this is a great report. Who is the Publisher, Date published and might you have the PDF copy?Market Failure is the central thrust here. Competition has failed to bring the market into equilibrium. Indeed the regulator has to strike. But when (Timming), how (Regulations or Competition Authority) and where (Application level (e.g MPESA)/Infrastructure level (e.g MVNO) or Corporate Level (e.g create mini-Safcoms) is a very delicate issue that can go horribly wrong. walu. From: Ali Hussein via isoc <isoc@lists.my.co.ke> To: KICTAnet ICT Policy Discussions <kictanet@lists.kictanet.or.ke>; ISOC Kenya Chapter <ISOC@lists.my.co.ke> Sent: Friday, February 20, 2015 6:17 PM Subject: [isoc_ke] Dominance issue in the Telco sector Listers An analysis on the dominance issue with case studies across the world. 1 The Kenya Information and Communications (Amendment) Act 2013 The Kenya Information and Communications (Amendment) Act 2013 (the Act) states In Section 84W (3) that Communications Authority of Kenya (the Authority) may, by notice in the Gazette, declare a person or institution to be a “dominant telecommunications service provider” for the purposes of this Act. Section 84W (4) goes further to clarify what the Authority should consider in declaring an operator or institution dominant in subsection (4) as follow: -(a) the market share of the telecommunications service provider being at least fifty percentum of the relevant gross market segment;(b) the level of control over the communications infrastructure;(c) the level of technological advancement of the telecommunications service provider;(d) the scale of operations of the telecommunications service The Authority further developed Supplementary Legislation cited as the Kenya Information and Communications (Fair Competition and Equality of Treatment) Regulations, 2010 “the Regulations”. The Regulations indicate in section 7(1) that the Authority shall from time to time develop and publish, in the Kenya Gazette, guidelines to be followed when determining whether a licensee in a dominant market position in a specific communications market but this is not a precondition to determining an Institution as being dominant and therefore the Authority is mandated to declare an operator dominant under the current available Primary and secondary legislation. In regards to Dominance, the Regulations in Section 7 (2) and (3) further mentions additional criteria for deciding on dominance which include among others—(a) the degree of market concentration or the market share of the licensee, determined by reference to revenues, numbers of subscribers or volumes of sales;(b) the degree to which a licensee’s prices vary over time;(c) the ability of the licensee to maintain or erect barriers to entry to the market, including, by means of control of essential facilities, access to superior technology, privileged access to resources or capital markets or superior buying or negotiating position, amongst others;(d) the ability of the licensee to earn supernormal profits;(e) the global technology and commercial trends affecting market power;(f) the licensee’s power to make independent rate setting decisions;(g) the degree of product or service differentiation and sales promotion in the market; and(h) any other matters which the Commission may consider relevant. Section 7 (3) A licensee shall be in a dominant market position if;(a) it has the ability to materially raise prices without suffering a commensurate loss in service demand to other licensees;(b) it has the ability to erect or benefit from barriers to market entry;(c) the Commission has so determined a dominant market power report, after considering the circumstances and criteria set in these Regulations. In reference to the legal instruments cited above, the Authority has the mandate to declare an Institution dominant and our submission is dependent on these cited instruments to make a case for determining Safaricom as a being dominant in the Mobile Retail Voice, Data, SMS market and also in the Mobile Money Transfer markets. 2 The Relevant Market Segment In line with best practice worldwide and also based on previous market study done by PWC in 2010 for the Authority (then CCK) it is clear and evident that the Retail Mobile Voice, Retail Mobile Data, Retail SMS and Mobile Money Transfer are relevant market segments. Our focus will therefore be on the Mobile Retail Voice, Data, SMS and Mobile Money Transfer market segments. 3 Market Dominance definition in Kenya Market Dominance in Kenya can be determined based on the Act and the Regulations as identified above in item 2 above. Whereas globally there are other considerations known, we will use what is within the regulatory instruments available in Kenya. However for completeness, the Competition Act Chapter 504 Part C section 23. Also defines as dominance as follows: - Sections 23 (1) “dominant undertaking” means an undertaking which:(a) produces, supplies, distributes or otherwise controls not less than one-half of the total goods of any description which are produced, supplied or distributed in Kenya or any substantial part thereof; or (b) provides or otherwise controls not less than one-half of the services which are rendered This definition by the Competition Act is in harmony with the definition in the Act as it refers to half of total good s which aligns to the 50% market share specified in the Act. Our submission will therefore concentrate on the criteria in the Act and Regulations (which are yet to be amended in line with the Act) together with the Competition Act. 4 A case for Declaring Safaricom Dominant 4.1 Degree of Market Concentration or Market Share The Commission through its consultation paper on the intention to declare regulated services, found that there was high market shares, concentration ratios and Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI) 5,230 on Subscriber base and 6,758 on revenues against best practice of 1,800 which was a clear demonstration of lack of effective Competition in the mobile voice termination market and hence the need for regulatory intervention to correct market failure. While we appreciate that the market shares, concentration ratios and HH index might have changed since the consultation was done, we strongly feel that the mobile voice market is not effectively competitive and hence the need for regulatory intervention by the Commission. The current HHI based on number of subscribers remains well over 4000 which is still double the threshold for a concentrated market. The HHI thresholds in US and EU are defined as follows: - - HHI below 1000 – a competitive market. There are no dominant competitors in this market. - HHI between 1000 and 1800 – a moderately concentrated market - HHI above 1800 – a concentrated market. There are one or more dominant competitors in this market. This HHI though not reflected as a requirement to determine dominance in the Kenya goes to reinforce our submission that Safaricom is dominant. Safaricom’s market share has remained over 63% on the basis of mobile subscribers as can be seen from Table 2 and 78 % in traffic volumes for the period of January to March 2014. In terms of revenues it is about 80%. These figures are above the threshold that would lead to a rebuttable presumption of dominance. In established competition cases and also in line with the Competition Act chapter 504 in Kenya, sustained market shares of over 50% gives rise to a rebuttable presumption of dominance, while market shares of over 40% are suggestive of possibility of dominance. On the basis of market share alone, Safaricom holds a position of Dominance in retail voice, Retail Data, SMS and Mobile Money market and should be declared dominant. As per data provided below and also slide 30 in SFC H1 ’15 presentation, SFC holds: 68%, 78%, 97% and 72% market shares in subscribers, voice minutes, SMS traffic and data users. Moreover, they control 88% of total revenues of the market. (See extracts below) In summary, Safaricom has retained highest market shares as follows: - - Market share by Subscription (voice) 80% in 2010 to 68% in 2014 - Market share by Subscription (Data) 99% in 2010 to 71% in 2014 - Market Share by Voice Minutes (Voice) 80% in 2012 to 79% in 2014 - Market Share by number of SMS (SMS) 84% in 2012 to 96% in 2014 - Market Share by Revenues (Voice) 86% in 2012 to 88% in 2014 well over 80% market share in each Mobile voice, SMS and Mobile Data 4.1.1 Market Shares by Subscriptions Number Mobile Subscriptions per Operator in Millions | Month | Safaricom Ltd | Airtel Networks Kenya Ltd | Telkom Kenya Ltd | Essar Telecom (K) Ltd | Totals | | 2009/10 | 16.24 | 1.83 | 0.55 | 1.49 | 20.12 | | 2010/11 | 17.35 | 3.61 | 2.73 | 1.58 | 25.28 | | 2011/12 | 19.01 | 4.91 | 3.12 | 2.66 | 29.70 | | 2012/13 | 20.15 | 5.22 | 2.13 | 3.05 | 30.55 | | 2013/14 | 21.93 | 5.07 | 2.69 | 2.56 | 32.25 | Table 1: Number of mobile subscriptions since 2010 to Jun 2014Source: Extracted from CCK/CA published reports Market Share by Subscriptions since 2010 | Month | Safaricom Ltd | Airtel Networks Kenya Ltd | Telkom Kenya Ltd | Essar Telecom (K) Ltd | Totals | | 2009/10 | 80.7% | 9.1% | 2.7% | 7.4% | 100% | | 2010/11 | 68.6% | 14.3% | 10.8% | 6.3% | 100% | | 2011/12 | 64.0% | 16.5% | 10.5% | 9.0% | 100% | | 2012/13 | 65.9% | 17.1% | 7.0% | 10.0% | 100% | | 2013/14 | 68.0% | 15.7% | 8.3% | 8.0% | 100% | Table 2: Market Share by mobile subscriptions since 2010Source: Extracted from CCK/CA published reports Source: Derived from Table 1 above.Chart 2: Market Share by Number of Subscriptions Mobile Data Subscriptions by Operator | Operator | 2009/10 | 2010/11 | 2011/12 | 2012/13 | 2013/14 | | Safaricom Ltd | 2,959,906 | 3,584,283 | 5,262,307 | 9,332,995 | 9,974,377 | | Airtel Networks Kenya Ltd | 10,000 | 496,509 | 1,074,764 | 1,597,481 | 1,880,644 | | Telkom Kenya Ltd | - | 108,926 | 674,255 | 795,513 | 1,574,168 | | Essar Telecom (K) Ltd | - | - | 644,250 | 614,016 | 501,505 | | Totals | 2,969,906 | 4,189,718 | 7,655,576 | 12,340,005 | 13,930,694 | Source: Compiled from CCK/CA published reports Mobile Data Market Shares by Operator by Number of Subscriptions | Operator | 2009/10 | 2010/11 | 2011/12 | 2012/13 | 2013/14 | | Safaricom Ltd | 99.7% | 85.5% | 68.7% | 75.6% | 71.6% | | Airtel Networks Kenya Ltd | 0.3% | 11.9% | 14.0% | 12.9% | 13.5% | | Telkom Kenya Ltd | 0.0% | 2.6% | 8.8% | 6.4% | 11.3% | | Essar Telecom (K) Ltd | 0.0% | 0.0% | 8.4% | 5.0% | 3.6% | | Totals | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | Mobile Data Market Share by SubscriptionSource: CA Reports Extracts Source: Safaricom Half-Year Results Presentation 2014/2015 4.1.2 Market Shares by Traffic or Transactions Mobile Traffic Volumes by Operator since 2012 in Billion Minutes | Operator | Year 2011/12 | Year 2012/13 | Year 2013/14 | | Safaricom Ltd | 21.75 | 22.61 | 23.88 | | Airtel Networks Kenya Ltd | 2.93 | 3.38 | 3.06 | | Telkom Kenya Ltd | 0.21 | 0.38 | 0.92 | | Essar Telecom (K) Ltd | 2.07 | 2.43 | 2.38 | | Totals | 26.96 | 28.80 | 30.24 | Source: Compiled from CCK/CA published reports Mobile Voice Minutes Market Share by Operator over a three year Period | Operator | Year 2011/12 | Year 2012/13 | Year 2013/14 | | Safaricom Ltd | 80.7% | 78.5% | 79.0% | | Airtel Networks Kenya Ltd | 10.9% | 11.7% | 10.1% | | Telkom Kenya Ltd | 0.8% | 1.3% | 3.0% | | Essar Telecom (K) Ltd | 7.7% | 8.5% | 7.9% | | Totals | 100% | 100% | 100% | Chart 3: Market Share by Traffic Volumes in Minutes (2013/14) The above numbers clearly supports our submission to declare Safaricom as dominant in the Retail Voice, Data and SMS market. Mobile SMS Traffic by Mobile Operator in Millions SMS’s | Operator | Year 2011/12 | Year 2012/13 | Year 2013/14 | | Safaricom Ltd | 3,626.14 | 12,386.16 | 23,502.51 | | Airtel Networks Kenya Ltd | 494.01 | 632.10 | 731.61 | | Telkom Kenya Ltd | 75.02 | 74.25 | 92.35 | | Essar Telecom (K) Ltd | 100.21 | 140.58 | 117.55 | | Totals | 4,295 | 13,233 | 24,444 | Source: Compiled from CCK/CA published reports SMS Market Shares by Operator by number of SMS’s | Operator | Year 2011/12 | Year 2012/13 | Year 2013/14 | | Safaricom Ltd | 84% | 94% | 96% | | Airtel Networks Kenya Ltd | 12% | 5% | 3% | | Telkom Kenya Ltd | 2% | 1% | 0% | | Essar Telecom (K) Ltd | 2% | 1% | 0% | | Totals | 100% | 100% | 100% | 5 Benchmarking – Case Studies 5.1 Dominance Declarations in African Countries Recently the Nigeria Communications Commission declared MTN Nigeria and Globacom dominant following a study conducted by KPMG Professional Services. MTN was declared dominant in two market segment-Mobile Voice Market and Wholesale leased lines and transmission capacity whereas Globacom (Nigeria’s second National Operator) was declared the leader in wholesale leased lines and transmission capacity market. In its determination, Nigeria Communications Commission found that the mobile voice market was not effectively competitive and therefore ordered MTN (which has 44% of the mobile voice market) to charge same amount for on-net and off-net calls. We further wish to share with the Authority a list of countries in Africa which have declared some mobile operators dominant. | Country in Africa | Name of Dominant Operator in country | Market Share of Dominant Operator | Year Operator declared Dominant | | Nigeria | MTN | 44% | April 28, 2013 | | Congo B | MTNAirtel | 40%38% | March 2013 | | Niger | Airtel | 61.4% | 2013 | | chad | Airtel | 53% | 2013 | | Rwanda | MTN | 57% | 2013 | | Burkina Faso | AirtelTelmob | 39.24%38.36% | 2012 | | Senegal | Orange | 62.06 % | 2012 | | Gabon | Airtel | 45% | 2013 | We wish to highlight to the Authority that Safaricom has more market shares than most of the operators declared dominant as per the table above. We therefore request the Authority to proceed with speed to declare Safaricom dominant just like the other regulators have done in their jurisdictions. 5.2 IFT (Federal Telecommunication Institute) Mexico In early 2014 America Movil and its operating subsidiaries- Telecel (Mexico’s wireless market leader) and Telemex (the dominant fixed line player) were declared by the IFC as a dominant economic interest group in the telecommunications market. Telecel’s market share at the time stood at 69 % and Telemex’s market share stood at around 85%. The market concentration stood at 6382 points on the HHI with Mobile Market standing at 5334 point and the fixed telephony market stood at 4761 points on the HHI. According to the IFT a HHI score of more than 2000 points can affect competition. As the Authority will note the HHI scores are very much in line with the market concentration levels in Kenya.The regulator subjected them to the following regulations on the wholesale level:· Asymmetric interconnection rates· Access to passive infrastructure· Local loop unbundling· Mandatory National roaming Access The regulator subjected them to the following regulations on the retail level: · End to SIM locking of handsets· All services sold in bundles were required to be sold separately· Certain retail prices were to be reviewed. 5.3 Summary of obligations Imposed on Dominant Operators in other countries The following is a summary of Dominance Remedies implemented in various countries. It is important to note that Asymmetric Interconnection is one of the remedies, Account separation, infrastructure sharing and on-net/off-net equalization. | Country | Obligations | | Ghana | • Accounting Separation• Collapse of On‐net and Off‐net Retail Tariffs. The tariff for on‐net and off-net will be the same, and subject to periodic review.• Submission of Required Details: The Commission may require the dominant operator to submit details on specific aspects of its operations from time to time as the need arises.• Asymmetric interconnect termination rate regime applies to new entrants as well as Operators with less than 5% of subscriber market share | | Gabon | • Interconnection• Obligations of the quality of service, Obligation of non-discrimination transparency;• Publication of the catalog of infrastructure sharing;• Accounting separation obligation and duty on the cost accounting of all benefits | | Nigeria | • Collapsed of on-net and off-net retail tariffs to discourage calling club effect;• Accounts Separation; | | Mexico | • Asymmetric interconnection rates• Access to passive infrastructure• Local loop unbundling• Mandatory National roaming Access• End to SIM locking of handsets• All services sold in bundles were required to be sold separately• Certain retail prices were to be reviewed. | Ali Hussein +254 770 906375 / 0713 601113 Twitter: @AliHKassimSkype: abu-jomoLinkedIn: http://ke.linkedin.com/in/alihkassimBlog: www.alyhussein.com "I fear the day technology will surpass human interaction. The world will have a generation of idiots". ~ Albert Einstein Sent from my iPad _______________________________________________ isoc mailing list isoc@lists.my.co.ke http://lists.my.co.ke/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/isoc
Walu I thought so too. Unfortunately can't disclose the author..But you can read between the lines...:) And add 2+2 and come up with 5. :) Ali Hussein +254 770 906375 / 0713 601113 Twitter: @AliHKassim Skype: abu-jomo LinkedIn: http://ke.linkedin.com/in/alihkassim Blog: www.alyhussein.com "I fear the day technology will surpass human interaction. The world will have a generation of idiots". ~ Albert Einstein Sent from my iPad
On Feb 20, 2015, at 6:37 PM, Walubengo J <jwalu@yahoo.com> wrote:
Ali,
this is a great report. Who is the Publisher, Date published and might you have the PDF copy? Market Failure is the central thrust here. Competition has failed to bring the market into equilibrium.
Indeed the regulator has to strike. But when (Timming), how (Regulations or Competition Authority) and where (Application level (e.g MPESA)/Infrastructure level (e.g MVNO) or Corporate Level (e.g create mini-Safcoms) is a very delicate issue that can go horribly wrong.
walu.
From: Ali Hussein via isoc <isoc@lists.my.co.ke> To: KICTAnet ICT Policy Discussions <kictanet@lists.kictanet.or.ke>; ISOC Kenya Chapter <ISOC@lists.my.co.ke> Sent: Friday, February 20, 2015 6:17 PM Subject: [isoc_ke] Dominance issue in the Telco sector
Listers An analysis on the dominance issue with case studies across the world.
1 The Kenya Information and Communications (Amendment) Act 2013 The Kenya Information and Communications (Amendment) Act 2013 (the Act) states In Section 84W (3) that Communications Authority of Kenya (the Authority) may, by notice in the Gazette, declare a person or institution to be a “dominant telecommunications service provider” for the purposes of this Act.
Section 84W (4) goes further to clarify what the Authority should consider in declaring an operator or institution dominant in subsection (4) as follow: - (a) the market share of the telecommunications service provider being at least fifty percentum of the relevant gross market segment; (b) the level of control over the communications infrastructure; (c) the level of technological advancement of the telecommunications service provider; (d) the scale of operations of the telecommunications service
The Authority further developed Supplementary Legislation cited as the Kenya Information and Communications (Fair Competition and Equality of Treatment) Regulations, 2010 “the Regulations”. The Regulations indicate in section 7(1) that the Authority shall from time to time develop and publish, in the Kenya Gazette, guidelines to be followed when determining whether a licensee in a dominant market position in a specific communications market but this is not a precondition to determining an Institution as being dominant and therefore the Authority is mandated to declare an operator dominant under the current available Primary and secondary legislation.
In regards to Dominance, the Regulations in Section 7 (2) and (3) further mentions additional criteria for deciding on dominance which include among others— (a) the degree of market concentration or the market share of the licensee, determined by reference to revenues, numbers of subscribers or volumes of sales; (b) the degree to which a licensee’s prices vary over time; (c) the ability of the licensee to maintain or erect barriers to entry to the market, including, by means of control of essential facilities, access to superior technology, privileged access to resources or capital markets or superior buying or negotiating position, amongst others; (d) the ability of the licensee to earn supernormal profits; (e) the global technology and commercial trends affecting market power; (f) the licensee’s power to make independent rate setting decisions; (g) the degree of product or service differentiation and sales promotion in the market; and (h) any other matters which the Commission may consider relevant.
Section 7 (3) A licensee shall be in a dominant market position if; (a) it has the ability to materially raise prices without suffering a commensurate loss in service demand to other licensees; (b) it has the ability to erect or benefit from barriers to market entry; (c) the Commission has so determined a dominant market power report, after considering the circumstances and criteria set in these Regulations.
In reference to the legal instruments cited above, the Authority has the mandate to declare an Institution dominant and our submission is dependent on these cited instruments to make a case for determining Safaricom as a being dominant in the Mobile Retail Voice, Data, SMS market and also in the Mobile Money Transfer markets.
2 The Relevant Market Segment
In line with best practice worldwide and also based on previous market study done by PWC in 2010 for the Authority (then CCK) it is clear and evident that the Retail Mobile Voice, Retail Mobile Data, Retail SMS and Mobile Money Transfer are relevant market segments. Our focus will therefore be on the Mobile Retail Voice, Data, SMS and Mobile Money Transfer market segments.
3 Market Dominance definition in Kenya
Market Dominance in Kenya can be determined based on the Act and the Regulations as identified above in item 2 above. Whereas globally there are other considerations known, we will use what is within the regulatory instruments available in Kenya.
However for completeness, the Competition Act Chapter 504 Part C section 23. Also defines as dominance as follows: -
Sections 23 (1) “dominant undertaking” means an undertaking which: (a) produces, supplies, distributes or otherwise controls not less than one-half of the total goods of any description which are produced, supplied or distributed in Kenya or any substantial part thereof; or
(b) provides or otherwise controls not less than one-half of the services which are rendered
This definition by the Competition Act is in harmony with the definition in the Act as it refers to half of total good s which aligns to the 50% market share specified in the Act.
Our submission will therefore concentrate on the criteria in the Act and Regulations (which are yet to be amended in line with the Act) together with the Competition Act. 4 A case for Declaring Safaricom Dominant 4.1 Degree of Market Concentration or Market Share The Commission through its consultation paper on the intention to declare regulated services, found that there was high market shares, concentration ratios and Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI) 5,230 on Subscriber base and 6,758 on revenues against best practice of 1,800 which was a clear demonstration of lack of effective Competition in the mobile voice termination market and hence the need for regulatory intervention to correct market failure. While we appreciate that the market shares, concentration ratios and HH index might have changed since the consultation was done, we strongly feel that the mobile voice market is not effectively competitive and hence the need for regulatory intervention by the Commission. The current HHI based on number of subscribers remains well over 4000 which is still double the threshold for a concentrated market.
The HHI thresholds in US and EU are defined as follows: - HHI below 1000 – a competitive market. There are no dominant competitors in this market. HHI between 1000 and 1800 – a moderately concentrated market HHI above 1800 – a concentrated market. There are one or more dominant competitors in this market.
This HHI though not reflected as a requirement to determine dominance in the Kenya goes to reinforce our submission that Safaricom is dominant.
Safaricom’s market share has remained over 63% on the basis of mobile subscribers as can be seen from Table 2 and 78 % in traffic volumes for the period of January to March 2014. In terms of revenues it is about 80%. These figures are above the threshold that would lead to a rebuttable presumption of dominance. In established competition cases and also in line with the Competition Act chapter 504 in Kenya, sustained market shares of over 50% gives rise to a rebuttable presumption of dominance, while market shares of over 40% are suggestive of possibility of dominance. On the basis of market share alone, Safaricom holds a position of Dominance in retail voice, Retail Data, SMS and Mobile Money market and should be declared dominant. As per data provided below and also slide 30 in SFC H1 ’15 presentation, SFC holds: 68%, 78%, 97% and 72% market shares in subscribers, voice minutes, SMS traffic and data users. Moreover, they control 88% of total revenues of the market. (See extracts below)
In summary, Safaricom has retained highest market shares as follows: - Market share by Subscription (voice) 80% in 2010 to 68% in 2014 Market share by Subscription (Data) 99% in 2010 to 71% in 2014 Market Share by Voice Minutes (Voice) 80% in 2012 to 79% in 2014 Market Share by number of SMS (SMS) 84% in 2012 to 96% in 2014 Market Share by Revenues (Voice) 86% in 2012 to 88% in 2014 well over 80% market share in each Mobile voice, SMS and Mobile Data
4.1.1 Market Shares by Subscriptions Number Mobile Subscriptions per Operator in Millions Month Safaricom Ltd Airtel Networks Kenya Ltd Telkom Kenya Ltd Essar Telecom (K) Ltd Totals 2009/10 16.24 1.83 0.55 1.49 20.12 2010/11 17.35 3.61 2.73 1.58 25.28 2011/12 19.01 4.91 3.12 2.66 29.70 2012/13 20.15 5.22 2.13 3.05 30.55 2013/14 21.93 5.07 2.69 2.56 32.25 Table 1: Number of mobile subscriptions since 2010 to Jun 2014 Source: Extracted from CCK/CA published reports
Market Share by Subscriptions since 2010 Month Safaricom Ltd Airtel Networks Kenya Ltd Telkom Kenya Ltd Essar Telecom (K) Ltd Totals 2009/10 80.7% 9.1% 2.7% 7.4% 100% 2010/11 68.6% 14.3% 10.8% 6.3% 100% 2011/12 64.0% 16.5% 10.5% 9.0% 100% 2012/13 65.9% 17.1% 7.0% 10.0% 100% 2013/14 68.0% 15.7% 8.3% 8.0% 100% Table 2: Market Share by mobile subscriptions since 2010 Source: Extracted from CCK/CA published reports
Source: Derived from Table 1 above. Chart 2: Market Share by Number of Subscriptions
Mobile Data Subscriptions by Operator Operator 2009/10 2010/11 2011/12 2012/13 2013/14 Safaricom Ltd 2,959,906 3,584,283 5,262,307 9,332,995 9,974,377 Airtel Networks Kenya Ltd 10,000 496,509 1,074,764 1,597,481 1,880,644 Telkom Kenya Ltd - 108,926 674,255 795,513 1,574,168 Essar Telecom (K) Ltd - - 644,250 614,016 501,505 Totals 2,969,906 4,189,718 7,655,576 12,340,005 13,930,694 Source: Compiled from CCK/CA published reports
Mobile Data Market Shares by Operator by Number of Subscriptions Operator 2009/10 2010/11 2011/12 2012/13 2013/14 Safaricom Ltd 99.7% 85.5% 68.7% 75.6% 71.6% Airtel Networks Kenya Ltd 0.3% 11.9% 14.0% 12.9% 13.5% Telkom Kenya Ltd 0.0% 2.6% 8.8% 6.4% 11.3% Essar Telecom (K) Ltd 0.0% 0.0% 8.4% 5.0% 3.6% Totals 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%
Mobile Data Market Share by Subscription <image004.png> Source: CA Reports Extracts
<image006.png> Source: Safaricom Half-Year Results Presentation 2014/2015
4.1.2 Market Shares by Traffic or Transactions
Mobile Traffic Volumes by Operator since 2012 in Billion Minutes Operator Year 2011/12 Year 2012/13 Year 2013/14 Safaricom Ltd 21.75 22.61 23.88 Airtel Networks Kenya Ltd 2.93 3.38 3.06 Telkom Kenya Ltd 0.21 0.38 0.92 Essar Telecom (K) Ltd 2.07 2.43 2.38 Totals 26.96 28.80 30.24 Source: Compiled from CCK/CA published reports
Mobile Voice Minutes Market Share by Operator over a three year Period Operator Year 2011/12 Year 2012/13 Year 2013/14 Safaricom Ltd 80.7% 78.5% 79.0% Airtel Networks Kenya Ltd 10.9% 11.7% 10.1% Telkom Kenya Ltd 0.8% 1.3% 3.0% Essar Telecom (K) Ltd 7.7% 8.5% 7.9% Totals 100% 100% 100%
<image008.png>
Chart 3: Market Share by Traffic Volumes in Minutes (2013/14)
The above numbers clearly supports our submission to declare Safaricom as dominant in the Retail Voice, Data and SMS market.
Mobile SMS Traffic by Mobile Operator in Millions SMS’s Operator Year 2011/12 Year 2012/13 Year 2013/14 Safaricom Ltd 3,626.14 12,386.16 23,502.51 Airtel Networks Kenya Ltd 494.01 632.10 731.61 Telkom Kenya Ltd 75.02 74.25 92.35 Essar Telecom (K) Ltd 100.21 140.58 117.55 Totals 4,295 13,233 24,444 Source: Compiled from CCK/CA published reports
SMS Market Shares by Operator by number of SMS’s Operator Year 2011/12 Year 2012/13 Year 2013/14 Safaricom Ltd 84% 94% 96% Airtel Networks Kenya Ltd 12% 5% 3% Telkom Kenya Ltd 2% 1% 0% Essar Telecom (K) Ltd 2% 1% 0% Totals 100% 100% 100% 5 Benchmarking – Case Studies 5.1 Dominance Declarations in African Countries Recently the Nigeria Communications Commission declared MTN Nigeria and Globacom dominant following a study conducted by KPMG Professional Services. MTN was declared dominant in two market segment-Mobile Voice Market and Wholesale leased lines and transmission capacity whereas Globacom (Nigeria’s second National Operator) was declared the leader in wholesale leased lines and transmission capacity market.
In its determination, Nigeria Communications Commission found that the mobile voice market was not effectively competitive and therefore ordered MTN (which has 44% of the mobile voice market) to charge same amount for on-net and off-net calls. We further wish to share with the Authority a list of countries in Africa which have declared some mobile operators dominant.
Country in Africa Name of Dominant Operator in country Market Share of Dominant Operator Year Operator declared Dominant Nigeria MTN 44% April 28, 2013 Congo B MTN Airtel 40% 38% March 2013 Niger Airtel 61.4% 2013 chad Airtel 53% 2013 Rwanda MTN 57% 2013 Burkina Faso Airtel Telmob 39.24% 38.36% 2012 Senegal Orange 62.06 % 2012 Gabon Airtel 45% 2013
We wish to highlight to the Authority that Safaricom has more market shares than most of the operators declared dominant as per the table above. We therefore request the Authority to proceed with speed to declare Safaricom dominant just like the other regulators have done in their jurisdictions.
5.2 IFT (Federal Telecommunication Institute) Mexico In early 2014 America Movil and its operating subsidiaries- Telecel (Mexico’s wireless market leader) and Telemex (the dominant fixed line player) were declared by the IFC as a dominant economic interest group in the telecommunications market. Telecel’s market share at the time stood at 69 % and Telemex’s market share stood at around 85%. The market concentration stood at 6382 points on the HHI with Mobile Market standing at 5334 point and the fixed telephony market stood at 4761 points on the HHI. According to the IFT a HHI score of more than 2000 points can affect competition. As the Authority will note the HHI scores are very much in line with the market concentration levels in Kenya. The regulator subjected them to the following regulations on the wholesale level: · Asymmetric interconnection rates · Access to passive infrastructure · Local loop unbundling · Mandatory National roaming Access
The regulator subjected them to the following regulations on the retail level:
· End to SIM locking of handsets · All services sold in bundles were required to be sold separately · Certain retail prices were to be reviewed. 5.3 Summary of obligations Imposed on Dominant Operators in other countries The following is a summary of Dominance Remedies implemented in various countries. It is important to note that Asymmetric Interconnection is one of the remedies, Account separation, infrastructure sharing and on-net/off-net equalization.
Country Obligations Ghana • Accounting Separation • Collapse of On‐net and Off‐net Retail Tariffs. The tariff for on‐net and off-net will be the same, and subject to periodic review. • Submission of Required Details: The Commission may require the dominant operator to submit details on specific aspects of its operations from time to time as the need arises. • Asymmetric interconnect termination rate regime applies to new entrants as well as Operators with less than 5% of subscriber market share Gabon • Interconnection • Obligations of the quality of service, Obligation of non-discrimination transparency; • Publication of the catalog of infrastructure sharing; • Accounting separation obligation and duty on the cost accounting of all benefits Nigeria • Collapsed of on-net and off-net retail tariffs to discourage calling club effect; • Accounts Separation; Mexico • Asymmetric interconnection rates • Access to passive infrastructure • Local loop unbundling • Mandatory National roaming Access • End to SIM locking of handsets • All services sold in bundles were required to be sold separately • Certain retail prices were to be reviewed.
Ali Hussein
+254 770 906375 / 0713 601113
Twitter: @AliHKassim Skype: abu-jomo LinkedIn: http://ke.linkedin.com/in/alihkassim Blog: www.alyhussein.com
"I fear the day technology will surpass human interaction. The world will have a generation of idiots". ~ Albert Einstein
Sent from my iPad
_______________________________________________ isoc mailing list isoc@lists.my.co.ke http://lists.my.co.ke/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/isoc
<image002.png> <image004.png> <image006.png> <image008.png>
Maybe lets try China Mobile...:-) On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 9:15 PM, Ali Hussein via kictanet < kictanet@lists.kictanet.or.ke> wrote:
Walu
I thought so too. Unfortunately can't disclose the author..But you can read between the lines...:)
And add 2+2 and come up with 5. :)
*Ali Hussein*
+254 770 906375 / 0713 601113
Twitter: @AliHKassim
Skype: abu-jomo
LinkedIn: http://ke.linkedin.com/in/alihkassim <http://ke.linkedin.com/in/alihkassim>
Blog: www.alyhussein.com
"I fear the day technology will surpass human interaction. The world will have a generation of idiots". ~ Albert Einstein
Sent from my iPad
On Feb 20, 2015, at 6:37 PM, Walubengo J <jwalu@yahoo.com> wrote:
Ali,
this is a great report. Who is the Publisher, Date published and might you have the PDF copy? Market Failure is the central thrust here. Competition has failed to bring the market into equilibrium.
Indeed the regulator has to strike. But when (Timming), how (Regulations or Competition Authority) and where (Application level (e.g MPESA)/Infrastructure level (e.g MVNO) or Corporate Level (e.g create mini-Safcoms) is a very delicate issue that can go horribly wrong.
walu.
------------------------------ *From:* Ali Hussein via isoc <isoc@lists.my.co.ke> *To:* KICTAnet ICT Policy Discussions <kictanet@lists.kictanet.or.ke>; ISOC Kenya Chapter <ISOC@lists.my.co.ke> *Sent:* Friday, February 20, 2015 6:17 PM *Subject:* [isoc_ke] Dominance issue in the Telco sector
Listers An analysis on the dominance issue with case studies across the world. 1 The Kenya Information and Communications (Amendment) Act 2013 The Kenya Information and Communications (Amendment) Act 2013 (the Act) states In Section 84W (3) that Communications Authority of Kenya (the Authority) may, by notice in the Gazette, declare a person or institution to be a “dominant telecommunications service provider” for the purposes of this Act.
Section 84W (4) goes further to clarify what the Authority should consider in declaring an operator or institution dominant in subsection (4) as follow: - (a) the market share of the telecommunications service provider being at least fifty percentum of the relevant gross market segment; (b) the level of control over the communications infrastructure; (c) the level of technological advancement of the telecommunications service provider; (d) the scale of operations of the telecommunications service
The Authority further developed Supplementary Legislation cited as the Kenya Information and Communications (Fair Competition and Equality of Treatment) Regulations, 2010 “the Regulations”. The Regulations indicate in section 7(1) that the Authority shall from time to time develop and publish, in the Kenya Gazette, guidelines to be followed when determining whether a licensee in a dominant market position in a specific communications market but this is not a precondition to determining an Institution as being dominant and therefore the Authority is mandated to declare an operator dominant under the current available Primary and secondary legislation.
In regards to Dominance, the Regulations in Section 7 (2) and (3) further mentions additional criteria for deciding on dominance which include among others— (a) the degree of market concentration or the market share of the licensee, determined by reference to revenues, numbers of subscribers or volumes of sales; (b) the degree to which a licensee’s prices vary over time; (c) the ability of the licensee to maintain or erect barriers to entry to the market, including, by means of control of essential facilities, access to superior technology, privileged access to resources or capital markets or superior buying or negotiating position, amongst others; (d) the ability of the licensee to earn supernormal profits; (e) the global technology and commercial trends affecting market power; (f) the licensee’s power to make independent rate setting decisions; (g) the degree of product or service differentiation and sales promotion in the market; and (h) any other matters which the Commission may consider relevant.
Section 7 (3) A licensee shall be in a dominant market position if; (a) it has the ability to materially raise prices without suffering a commensurate loss in service demand to other licensees; (b) it has the ability to erect or benefit from barriers to market entry; (c) the Commission has so determined a dominant market power report, after considering the circumstances and criteria set in these Regulations.
In reference to the legal instruments cited above, the Authority has the mandate to declare an Institution dominant and our submission is dependent on these cited instruments to make a case for determining Safaricom as a being dominant in the Mobile Retail Voice, Data, SMS market and also in the Mobile Money Transfer markets.
2 The Relevant Market Segment
In line with best practice worldwide and also based on previous market study done by PWC in 2010 for the Authority (then CCK) it is clear and evident that the Retail Mobile Voice, Retail Mobile Data, Retail SMS and Mobile Money Transfer are relevant market segments. Our focus will therefore be on the Mobile Retail Voice, Data, SMS and Mobile Money Transfer market segments.
3 Market Dominance definition in Kenya
Market Dominance in Kenya can be determined based on the Act and the Regulations as identified above in item 2 above. Whereas globally there are other considerations known, we will use what is within the regulatory instruments available in Kenya.
However for completeness, the Competition Act Chapter 504 Part C section 23. Also defines as dominance as follows: -
Sections 23 (1) “dominant undertaking” means an undertaking which: (a) produces, supplies, distributes or otherwise controls not less than one-half of the total goods of any description which are produced, supplied or distributed in Kenya or any substantial part thereof; or
(b) provides or otherwise controls not less than one-half of the services which are rendered
This definition by the Competition Act is in harmony with the definition in the Act as it refers to half of total good s which aligns to the 50% market share specified in the Act.
Our submission will therefore concentrate on the criteria in the Act and Regulations (which are yet to be amended in line with the Act) together with the Competition Act. 4 A case for Declaring Safaricom Dominant4.1 Degree of Market Concentration or Market Share The Commission through its consultation paper on the intention to declare regulated services, found that there was high market shares, concentration ratios and Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI) 5,230 on Subscriber base and 6,758 on revenues against best practice of 1,800 which was a clear demonstration of lack of effective Competition in the mobile voice termination market and hence the need for regulatory intervention to correct market failure. While we appreciate that the market shares, concentration ratios and HH index might have changed since the consultation was done, we strongly feel that the mobile voice market is not effectively competitive and hence the need for regulatory intervention by the Commission. The current HHI based on number of subscribers remains well over 4000 which is still double the threshold for a concentrated market.
The HHI thresholds in US and EU are defined as follows: -
- HHI below 1000 – a competitive market. There are no dominant competitors in this market. - HHI between 1000 and 1800 – a moderately concentrated market - HHI above 1800 – a concentrated market. There are one or more dominant competitors in this market.
This HHI though not reflected as a requirement to determine dominance in the Kenya goes to reinforce our submission that Safaricom is dominant.
Safaricom’s market share has remained over 63% on the basis of mobile subscribers as can be seen from Table 2 and 78 % in traffic volumes for the period of January to March 2014. In terms of revenues it is about 80%. These figures are above the threshold that would lead to a rebuttable presumption of dominance. In established competition cases and also in line with the Competition Act chapter 504 in Kenya, sustained market shares of over 50% gives rise to a rebuttable presumption of dominance, while market shares of over 40% are suggestive of possibility of dominance. On the basis of market share alone, Safaricom holds a position of Dominance in retail voice, Retail Data, SMS and Mobile Money market and should be declared dominant. As per data provided below and also slide 30 in SFC H1 ’15 presentation, SFC holds: 68%, 78%, 97% and 72% market shares in subscribers, voice minutes, SMS traffic and data users. Moreover, they control 88% of total revenues of the market. (See extracts below)
In summary, Safaricom has retained highest market shares as follows: -
- Market share by Subscription (voice) 80% in 2010 to 68% in 2014 - Market share by Subscription (Data) 99% in 2010 to 71% in 2014 - Market Share by Voice Minutes (Voice) 80% in 2012 to 79% in 2014 - Market Share by number of SMS (SMS) 84% in 2012 to 96% in 2014 - Market Share by Revenues (Voice) 86% in 2012 to 88% in 2014 well over 80% market share in each Mobile voice, SMS and Mobile Data
4.1.1 Market Shares by Subscriptions *Number Mobile Subscriptions per Operator in Millions* *Month* *Safaricom Ltd* *Airtel Networks Kenya Ltd* *Telkom Kenya Ltd* *Essar Telecom (K) Ltd* *Totals* *2009/10* 16.24 1.83 0.55 1.49 20.12 *2010/11* 17.35 3.61 2.73 1.58 25.28 *2011/12* 19.01 4.91 3.12 2.66 29.70 *2012/13* 20.15 5.22 2.13 3.05 30.55 *2013/14* 21.93 5.07 2.69 2.56 32.25 Table 1: Number of mobile subscriptions since 2010 to Jun 2014 *Source: Extracted from CCK/CA published reports*
Market Share by Subscriptions since 2010 *Month* *Safaricom Ltd* *Airtel Networks Kenya Ltd* *Telkom Kenya Ltd* *Essar Telecom (K) Ltd* *Totals* *2009/10* 80.7% 9.1% 2.7% 7.4% 100% *2010/11* 68.6% 14.3% 10.8% 6.3% 100% *2011/12* 64.0% 16.5% 10.5% 9.0% 100% *2012/13* 65.9% 17.1% 7.0% 10.0% 100% *2013/14* 68.0% 15.7% 8.3% 8.0% 100% Table 2: Market Share by mobile subscriptions since 2010 *Source: Extracted from CCK/CA published reports*
*Source: Derived from Table 1 above.* Chart 2: Market Share by Number of Subscriptions
Mobile Data Subscriptions by Operator *Operator* *2009/10* *2010/11* *2011/12* *2012/13* *2013/14* *Safaricom Ltd* 2,959,906 3,584,283 5,262,307 9,332,995 9,974,377 *Airtel Networks Kenya Ltd* 10,000 496,509 1,074,764 1,597,481 1,880,644 *Telkom Kenya Ltd* - 108,926 674,255 795,513 1,574,168 *Essar Telecom (K) Ltd* - - 644,250 614,016 501,505 *Totals* 2,969,906 4,189,718 7,655,576 12,340,005 13,930,694 *Source: Compiled from CCK/CA published reports*
Mobile Data Market Shares by Operator by Number of Subscriptions *Operator* *2009/10* *2010/11* *2011/12* *2012/13* *2013/14* *Safaricom Ltd* 99.7% 85.5% 68.7% 75.6% 71.6% *Airtel Networks Kenya Ltd* 0.3% 11.9% 14.0% 12.9% 13.5% *Telkom Kenya Ltd* 0.0% 2.6% 8.8% 6.4% 11.3% *Essar Telecom (K) Ltd* 0.0% 0.0% 8.4% 5.0% 3.6% *Totals* 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%
Mobile Data Market Share by Subscription <image004.png> Source: CA Reports Extracts
<image006.png> Source: Safaricom Half-Year Results Presentation 2014/2015
4.1.2 Market Shares by Traffic or Transactions
Mobile Traffic Volumes by Operator since 2012 in Billion Minutes *Operator* *Year 2011/12 * *Year 2012/13* *Year 2013/14* *Safaricom Ltd* 21.75 22.61 23.88 *Airtel Networks Kenya Ltd* 2.93 3.38 3.06 *Telkom Kenya Ltd* 0.21 0.38 0.92 *Essar Telecom (K) Ltd* 2.07 2.43 2.38 *Totals* 26.96 28.80 30.24 *Source: Compiled from CCK/CA published reports*
Mobile Voice Minutes Market Share by Operator over a three year Period *Operator* *Year 2011/12* *Year 2012/13* *Year 2013/14* *Safaricom Ltd* 80.7% 78.5% 79.0% *Airtel Networks Kenya Ltd* 10.9% 11.7% 10.1% *Telkom Kenya Ltd* 0.8% 1.3% 3.0% *Essar Telecom (K) Ltd* 7.7% 8.5% 7.9% *Totals* 100% 100% 100%
<image008.png>
Chart 3: Market Share by Traffic Volumes in Minutes (2013/14)
The above numbers clearly supports our submission to declare Safaricom as dominant in the Retail Voice, Data and SMS market.
Mobile SMS Traffic by Mobile Operator in Millions SMS’s Operator Year 2011/12 Year 2012/13 Year 2013/14 Safaricom Ltd 3,626.14 12,386.16 23,502.51 Airtel Networks Kenya Ltd 494.01 632.10 731.61 Telkom Kenya Ltd 75.02 74.25 92.35 Essar Telecom (K) Ltd 100.21 140.58 117.55 Totals 4,295 13,233 24,444 *Source: Compiled from CCK/CA published reports*
SMS Market Shares by Operator by number of SMS’s Operator Year 2011/12 Year 2012/13 Year 2013/14 Safaricom Ltd 84% 94% 96% Airtel Networks Kenya Ltd 12% 5% 3% Telkom Kenya Ltd 2% 1% 0% Essar Telecom (K) Ltd 2% 1% 0% Totals 100% 100% 100% 5 Benchmarking – Case Studies5.1 Dominance Declarations in African Countries Recently the Nigeria Communications Commission declared MTN Nigeria and Globacom dominant following a study conducted by KPMG Professional Services. MTN was declared dominant in two market segment-Mobile Voice Market and Wholesale leased lines and transmission capacity whereas Globacom (Nigeria’s second National Operator) was declared the leader in wholesale leased lines and transmission capacity market.
In its determination, Nigeria Communications Commission found that the mobile voice market was not effectively competitive and therefore ordered MTN (which has 44% of the mobile voice market) to charge same amount for on-net and off-net calls. We further wish to share with the Authority a list of countries in Africa which have declared some mobile operators dominant.
*Country in Africa* *Name of Dominant Operator in country* *Market Share of Dominant Operator* *Year Operator declared Dominant* Nigeria MTN 44% April 28, 2013 Congo B MTN Airtel 40% 38% March 2013 Niger Airtel 61.4% 2013 chad Airtel 53% 2013 Rwanda MTN 57% 2013 Burkina Faso Airtel Telmob 39.24% 38.36% 2012 Senegal Orange 62.06 % 2012 Gabon Airtel 45% 2013
We wish to highlight to the Authority that Safaricom has more market shares than most of the operators declared dominant as per the table above. We therefore request the Authority to proceed with speed to declare Safaricom dominant just like the other regulators have done in their jurisdictions.
5.2 IFT (Federal Telecommunication Institute) Mexico In early 2014 America Movil and its operating subsidiaries- Telecel (Mexico’s wireless market leader) and Telemex (the dominant fixed line player) were declared by the IFC as a dominant economic interest group in the telecommunications market. Telecel’s market share at the time stood at 69 % and Telemex’s market share stood at around 85%. The market concentration stood at 6382 points on the HHI with Mobile Market standing at 5334 point and the fixed telephony market stood at 4761 points on the HHI. According to the IFT a HHI score of more than 2000 points can affect competition. As the Authority will note the HHI scores are very much in line with the market concentration levels in Kenya. The regulator subjected them to the following regulations on the wholesale level: · Asymmetric interconnection rates · Access to passive infrastructure · Local loop unbundling · Mandatory National roaming Access
The regulator subjected them to the following regulations on the retail level:
· End to SIM locking of handsets · All services sold in bundles were required to be sold separately · Certain retail prices were to be reviewed. 5.3 Summary of obligations Imposed on Dominant Operators in other countries The following is a summary of Dominance Remedies implemented in various countries. It is important to note that Asymmetric Interconnection is one of the remedies, Account separation, infrastructure sharing and on-net/off-net equalization.
*Country* *Obligations* *Ghana * • Accounting Separation • Collapse of On‐net and Off‐net Retail Tariffs. The tariff for on‐net and off-net will be the same, and subject to periodic review. • Submission of Required Details: The Commission may require the dominant operator to submit details on specific aspects of its operations from time to time as the need arises. • Asymmetric interconnect termination rate regime applies to new entrants as well as Operators with less than 5% of subscriber market share *Gabon* • Interconnection • Obligations of the quality of service, Obligation of non-discrimination transparency; • Publication of the catalog of infrastructure sharing; • Accounting separation obligation and duty on the cost accounting of all benefits *Nigeria* • Collapsed of on-net and off-net retail tariffs to discourage calling club effect; • Accounts Separation; *Mexico* • Asymmetric interconnection rates • Access to passive infrastructure • Local loop unbundling • Mandatory National roaming Access • End to SIM locking of handsets • All services sold in bundles were required to be sold separately • Certain retail prices were to be reviewed.
*Ali Hussein*
+254 770 906375 / 0713 601113
Twitter: @AliHKassim Skype: abu-jomo LinkedIn: http://ke.linkedin.com/in/alihkassim <http://ke.linkedin.com/in/alihkassim> Blog: www.alyhussein.com
"I fear the day technology will surpass human interaction. The world will have a generation of idiots". ~ Albert Einstein
Sent from my iPad
_______________________________________________ isoc mailing list isoc@lists.my.co.ke http://lists.my.co.ke/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/isoc
<image002.png>
<image004.png>
<image006.png>
<image008.png>
_______________________________________________ kictanet mailing list kictanet@lists.kictanet.or.ke https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/listinfo/kictanet
Unsubscribe or change your options at https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/options/kictanet/oloo.khisa%40gmail.com
The Kenya ICT Action Network (KICTANet) is a multi-stakeholder platform for people and institutions interested and involved in ICT policy and regulation. The network aims to act as a catalyst for reform in the ICT sector in support of the national aim of ICT enabled growth and development.
KICTANetiquette : Adhere to the same standards of acceptable behaviors online that you follow in real life: respect people's times and bandwidth, share knowledge, don't flame or abuse or personalize, respect privacy, do not spam, do not market your wares or qualifications.
-- "Service to Mankind is the greatest form of service"... *Oloo KhisaP.O. Box 24324-00100Nairobi0721321086/0731849128http://ke.linkedin.com/in/olookhisa <http://ke.linkedin.com/in/olookhisa>*
This is an excerpt from the CGAP blog http://www.cgap.org/blog/10-myths-about-m-pesa-2014-update. 'More interesting still, Safaricom recently slashed P2P prices on low-value transfers, while raising them at the high end. This was likely a response to Equity’s planned launch of the FinServe MVNO, and may be based in part on evidence that consumers sending large values will be willing to pay more for the service <http://www.cgap.org/blog/price-sensitivity-and-new-m-pesa-tariffs> than those sending low values. It also raises the question of how high Safaricom’s margins are, if they were able to reduce prices by as much as 67% overnight.' Two points: 1. Safaricom was able to slash prices by up to 67% 'maybe' and 'allegedly' to forestall successful market entry by competition. This is detrimental to consumers by denying them a chance at a maybe better service and opportunity to compare and make an informed decision. (Safaricom is perceived as the main stumbling block to finserve Africa's entry. 2. According to the same article in 2014, ' According to the Central Bank, mobile money contributes to 6.59% of the total national payments throughput value <http://www.gsma.com/mobilefordevelopment/new-infographic-mobile-money-and-the-digitisation-of-kenyas-retail-payments-systems> (including both gross and retail) but a staggering 66.56% of the total NPS throughput volume. This means that M-PESA is important, but does not necessarily pose a systemic risk.' If one player controls over two thirds of national payment, that may be an issue for concern, no? you all notice the hullabaloo when M-pesa is or Safaricom service is down as was the case recently in Karen and Lang'ata areas. when the same behemoth controls police security communication apparatus, no matter how good and secure it may be, that IS putting all your eggs in one basket. Safaricom runs mostly on Huawei infrastructure (I think) so if all those horror stories about the Chinese espionage and recent escapades by chinese in parts of Nairobi ( the 76 facing cyber crime charges) then there is a real case for concern. and tehn there is the issue of mobile termination rates... *Every morning in Africa, a gazelle wakes up, It knows it must run faster than the fastest lion or it will be killed. Every morning a lion wakes up, it knows it must outrun the slowest gazelle or it will starve to death. It doesn't matter whether you are a gazelle or a lion. When the sun comes up, you better start running. - In "The World is Flat" by Thomas L. Friedman.* On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 9:15 PM, Ali Hussein via kictanet < kictanet@lists.kictanet.or.ke> wrote:
Walu
I thought so too. Unfortunately can't disclose the author..But you can read between the lines...:)
And add 2+2 and come up with 5. :)
*Ali Hussein*
+254 770 906375 / 0713 601113
Twitter: @AliHKassim
Skype: abu-jomo
LinkedIn: http://ke.linkedin.com/in/alihkassim <http://ke.linkedin.com/in/alihkassim>
Blog: www.alyhussein.com
"I fear the day technology will surpass human interaction. The world will have a generation of idiots". ~ Albert Einstein
Sent from my iPad
On Feb 20, 2015, at 6:37 PM, Walubengo J <jwalu@yahoo.com> wrote:
Ali,
this is a great report. Who is the Publisher, Date published and might you have the PDF copy? Market Failure is the central thrust here. Competition has failed to bring the market into equilibrium.
Indeed the regulator has to strike. But when (Timming), how (Regulations or Competition Authority) and where (Application level (e.g MPESA)/Infrastructure level (e.g MVNO) or Corporate Level (e.g create mini-Safcoms) is a very delicate issue that can go horribly wrong.
walu.
------------------------------ *From:* Ali Hussein via isoc <isoc@lists.my.co.ke> *To:* KICTAnet ICT Policy Discussions <kictanet@lists.kictanet.or.ke>; ISOC Kenya Chapter <ISOC@lists.my.co.ke> *Sent:* Friday, February 20, 2015 6:17 PM *Subject:* [isoc_ke] Dominance issue in the Telco sector
Listers An analysis on the dominance issue with case studies across the world. 1 The Kenya Information and Communications (Amendment) Act 2013 The Kenya Information and Communications (Amendment) Act 2013 (the Act) states In Section 84W (3) that Communications Authority of Kenya (the Authority) may, by notice in the Gazette, declare a person or institution to be a “dominant telecommunications service provider” for the purposes of this Act.
Section 84W (4) goes further to clarify what the Authority should consider in declaring an operator or institution dominant in subsection (4) as follow: - (a) the market share of the telecommunications service provider being at least fifty percentum of the relevant gross market segment; (b) the level of control over the communications infrastructure; (c) the level of technological advancement of the telecommunications service provider; (d) the scale of operations of the telecommunications service
The Authority further developed Supplementary Legislation cited as the Kenya Information and Communications (Fair Competition and Equality of Treatment) Regulations, 2010 “the Regulations”. The Regulations indicate in section 7(1) that the Authority shall from time to time develop and publish, in the Kenya Gazette, guidelines to be followed when determining whether a licensee in a dominant market position in a specific communications market but this is not a precondition to determining an Institution as being dominant and therefore the Authority is mandated to declare an operator dominant under the current available Primary and secondary legislation.
In regards to Dominance, the Regulations in Section 7 (2) and (3) further mentions additional criteria for deciding on dominance which include among others— (a) the degree of market concentration or the market share of the licensee, determined by reference to revenues, numbers of subscribers or volumes of sales; (b) the degree to which a licensee’s prices vary over time; (c) the ability of the licensee to maintain or erect barriers to entry to the market, including, by means of control of essential facilities, access to superior technology, privileged access to resources or capital markets or superior buying or negotiating position, amongst others; (d) the ability of the licensee to earn supernormal profits; (e) the global technology and commercial trends affecting market power; (f) the licensee’s power to make independent rate setting decisions; (g) the degree of product or service differentiation and sales promotion in the market; and (h) any other matters which the Commission may consider relevant.
Section 7 (3) A licensee shall be in a dominant market position if; (a) it has the ability to materially raise prices without suffering a commensurate loss in service demand to other licensees; (b) it has the ability to erect or benefit from barriers to market entry; (c) the Commission has so determined a dominant market power report, after considering the circumstances and criteria set in these Regulations.
In reference to the legal instruments cited above, the Authority has the mandate to declare an Institution dominant and our submission is dependent on these cited instruments to make a case for determining Safaricom as a being dominant in the Mobile Retail Voice, Data, SMS market and also in the Mobile Money Transfer markets.
2 The Relevant Market Segment
In line with best practice worldwide and also based on previous market study done by PWC in 2010 for the Authority (then CCK) it is clear and evident that the Retail Mobile Voice, Retail Mobile Data, Retail SMS and Mobile Money Transfer are relevant market segments. Our focus will therefore be on the Mobile Retail Voice, Data, SMS and Mobile Money Transfer market segments.
3 Market Dominance definition in Kenya
Market Dominance in Kenya can be determined based on the Act and the Regulations as identified above in item 2 above. Whereas globally there are other considerations known, we will use what is within the regulatory instruments available in Kenya.
However for completeness, the Competition Act Chapter 504 Part C section 23. Also defines as dominance as follows: -
Sections 23 (1) “dominant undertaking” means an undertaking which: (a) produces, supplies, distributes or otherwise controls not less than one-half of the total goods of any description which are produced, supplied or distributed in Kenya or any substantial part thereof; or
(b) provides or otherwise controls not less than one-half of the services which are rendered
This definition by the Competition Act is in harmony with the definition in the Act as it refers to half of total good s which aligns to the 50% market share specified in the Act.
Our submission will therefore concentrate on the criteria in the Act and Regulations (which are yet to be amended in line with the Act) together with the Competition Act. 4 A case for Declaring Safaricom Dominant4.1 Degree of Market Concentration or Market Share The Commission through its consultation paper on the intention to declare regulated services, found that there was high market shares, concentration ratios and Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI) 5,230 on Subscriber base and 6,758 on revenues against best practice of 1,800 which was a clear demonstration of lack of effective Competition in the mobile voice termination market and hence the need for regulatory intervention to correct market failure. While we appreciate that the market shares, concentration ratios and HH index might have changed since the consultation was done, we strongly feel that the mobile voice market is not effectively competitive and hence the need for regulatory intervention by the Commission. The current HHI based on number of subscribers remains well over 4000 which is still double the threshold for a concentrated market.
The HHI thresholds in US and EU are defined as follows: -
- HHI below 1000 – a competitive market. There are no dominant competitors in this market. - HHI between 1000 and 1800 – a moderately concentrated market - HHI above 1800 – a concentrated market. There are one or more dominant competitors in this market.
This HHI though not reflected as a requirement to determine dominance in the Kenya goes to reinforce our submission that Safaricom is dominant.
Safaricom’s market share has remained over 63% on the basis of mobile subscribers as can be seen from Table 2 and 78 % in traffic volumes for the period of January to March 2014. In terms of revenues it is about 80%. These figures are above the threshold that would lead to a rebuttable presumption of dominance. In established competition cases and also in line with the Competition Act chapter 504 in Kenya, sustained market shares of over 50% gives rise to a rebuttable presumption of dominance, while market shares of over 40% are suggestive of possibility of dominance. On the basis of market share alone, Safaricom holds a position of Dominance in retail voice, Retail Data, SMS and Mobile Money market and should be declared dominant. As per data provided below and also slide 30 in SFC H1 ’15 presentation, SFC holds: 68%, 78%, 97% and 72% market shares in subscribers, voice minutes, SMS traffic and data users. Moreover, they control 88% of total revenues of the market. (See extracts below)
In summary, Safaricom has retained highest market shares as follows: -
- Market share by Subscription (voice) 80% in 2010 to 68% in 2014 - Market share by Subscription (Data) 99% in 2010 to 71% in 2014 - Market Share by Voice Minutes (Voice) 80% in 2012 to 79% in 2014 - Market Share by number of SMS (SMS) 84% in 2012 to 96% in 2014 - Market Share by Revenues (Voice) 86% in 2012 to 88% in 2014 well over 80% market share in each Mobile voice, SMS and Mobile Data
4.1.1 Market Shares by Subscriptions *Number Mobile Subscriptions per Operator in Millions* *Month* *Safaricom Ltd* *Airtel Networks Kenya Ltd* *Telkom Kenya Ltd* *Essar Telecom (K) Ltd* *Totals* *2009/10* 16.24 1.83 0.55 1.49 20.12 *2010/11* 17.35 3.61 2.73 1.58 25.28 *2011/12* 19.01 4.91 3.12 2.66 29.70 *2012/13* 20.15 5.22 2.13 3.05 30.55 *2013/14* 21.93 5.07 2.69 2.56 32.25 Table 1: Number of mobile subscriptions since 2010 to Jun 2014 *Source: Extracted from CCK/CA published reports*
Market Share by Subscriptions since 2010 *Month* *Safaricom Ltd* *Airtel Networks Kenya Ltd* *Telkom Kenya Ltd* *Essar Telecom (K) Ltd* *Totals* *2009/10* 80.7% 9.1% 2.7% 7.4% 100% *2010/11* 68.6% 14.3% 10.8% 6.3% 100% *2011/12* 64.0% 16.5% 10.5% 9.0% 100% *2012/13* 65.9% 17.1% 7.0% 10.0% 100% *2013/14* 68.0% 15.7% 8.3% 8.0% 100% Table 2: Market Share by mobile subscriptions since 2010 *Source: Extracted from CCK/CA published reports*
*Source: Derived from Table 1 above.* Chart 2: Market Share by Number of Subscriptions
Mobile Data Subscriptions by Operator *Operator* *2009/10* *2010/11* *2011/12* *2012/13* *2013/14* *Safaricom Ltd* 2,959,906 3,584,283 5,262,307 9,332,995 9,974,377 *Airtel Networks Kenya Ltd* 10,000 496,509 1,074,764 1,597,481 1,880,644 *Telkom Kenya Ltd* - 108,926 674,255 795,513 1,574,168 *Essar Telecom (K) Ltd* - - 644,250 614,016 501,505 *Totals* 2,969,906 4,189,718 7,655,576 12,340,005 13,930,694 *Source: Compiled from CCK/CA published reports*
Mobile Data Market Shares by Operator by Number of Subscriptions *Operator* *2009/10* *2010/11* *2011/12* *2012/13* *2013/14* *Safaricom Ltd* 99.7% 85.5% 68.7% 75.6% 71.6% *Airtel Networks Kenya Ltd* 0.3% 11.9% 14.0% 12.9% 13.5% *Telkom Kenya Ltd* 0.0% 2.6% 8.8% 6.4% 11.3% *Essar Telecom (K) Ltd* 0.0% 0.0% 8.4% 5.0% 3.6% *Totals* 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%
Mobile Data Market Share by Subscription <image004.png> Source: CA Reports Extracts
<image006.png> Source: Safaricom Half-Year Results Presentation 2014/2015
4.1.2 Market Shares by Traffic or Transactions
Mobile Traffic Volumes by Operator since 2012 in Billion Minutes *Operator* *Year 2011/12 * *Year 2012/13* *Year 2013/14* *Safaricom Ltd* 21.75 22.61 23.88 *Airtel Networks Kenya Ltd* 2.93 3.38 3.06 *Telkom Kenya Ltd* 0.21 0.38 0.92 *Essar Telecom (K) Ltd* 2.07 2.43 2.38 *Totals* 26.96 28.80 30.24 *Source: Compiled from CCK/CA published reports*
Mobile Voice Minutes Market Share by Operator over a three year Period *Operator* *Year 2011/12* *Year 2012/13* *Year 2013/14* *Safaricom Ltd* 80.7% 78.5% 79.0% *Airtel Networks Kenya Ltd* 10.9% 11.7% 10.1% *Telkom Kenya Ltd* 0.8% 1.3% 3.0% *Essar Telecom (K) Ltd* 7.7% 8.5% 7.9% *Totals* 100% 100% 100%
<image008.png>
Chart 3: Market Share by Traffic Volumes in Minutes (2013/14)
The above numbers clearly supports our submission to declare Safaricom as dominant in the Retail Voice, Data and SMS market.
Mobile SMS Traffic by Mobile Operator in Millions SMS’s Operator Year 2011/12 Year 2012/13 Year 2013/14 Safaricom Ltd 3,626.14 12,386.16 23,502.51 Airtel Networks Kenya Ltd 494.01 632.10 731.61 Telkom Kenya Ltd 75.02 74.25 92.35 Essar Telecom (K) Ltd 100.21 140.58 117.55 Totals 4,295 13,233 24,444 *Source: Compiled from CCK/CA published reports*
SMS Market Shares by Operator by number of SMS’s Operator Year 2011/12 Year 2012/13 Year 2013/14 Safaricom Ltd 84% 94% 96% Airtel Networks Kenya Ltd 12% 5% 3% Telkom Kenya Ltd 2% 1% 0% Essar Telecom (K) Ltd 2% 1% 0% Totals 100% 100% 100% 5 Benchmarking – Case Studies5.1 Dominance Declarations in African Countries Recently the Nigeria Communications Commission declared MTN Nigeria and Globacom dominant following a study conducted by KPMG Professional Services. MTN was declared dominant in two market segment-Mobile Voice Market and Wholesale leased lines and transmission capacity whereas Globacom (Nigeria’s second National Operator) was declared the leader in wholesale leased lines and transmission capacity market.
In its determination, Nigeria Communications Commission found that the mobile voice market was not effectively competitive and therefore ordered MTN (which has 44% of the mobile voice market) to charge same amount for on-net and off-net calls. We further wish to share with the Authority a list of countries in Africa which have declared some mobile operators dominant.
*Country in Africa* *Name of Dominant Operator in country* *Market Share of Dominant Operator* *Year Operator declared Dominant* Nigeria MTN 44% April 28, 2013 Congo B MTN Airtel 40% 38% March 2013 Niger Airtel 61.4% 2013 chad Airtel 53% 2013 Rwanda MTN 57% 2013 Burkina Faso Airtel Telmob 39.24% 38.36% 2012 Senegal Orange 62.06 % 2012 Gabon Airtel 45% 2013
We wish to highlight to the Authority that Safaricom has more market shares than most of the operators declared dominant as per the table above. We therefore request the Authority to proceed with speed to declare Safaricom dominant just like the other regulators have done in their jurisdictions.
5.2 IFT (Federal Telecommunication Institute) Mexico In early 2014 America Movil and its operating subsidiaries- Telecel (Mexico’s wireless market leader) and Telemex (the dominant fixed line player) were declared by the IFC as a dominant economic interest group in the telecommunications market. Telecel’s market share at the time stood at 69 % and Telemex’s market share stood at around 85%. The market concentration stood at 6382 points on the HHI with Mobile Market standing at 5334 point and the fixed telephony market stood at 4761 points on the HHI. According to the IFT a HHI score of more than 2000 points can affect competition. As the Authority will note the HHI scores are very much in line with the market concentration levels in Kenya. The regulator subjected them to the following regulations on the wholesale level: · Asymmetric interconnection rates · Access to passive infrastructure · Local loop unbundling · Mandatory National roaming Access
The regulator subjected them to the following regulations on the retail level:
· End to SIM locking of handsets · All services sold in bundles were required to be sold separately · Certain retail prices were to be reviewed. 5.3 Summary of obligations Imposed on Dominant Operators in other countries The following is a summary of Dominance Remedies implemented in various countries. It is important to note that Asymmetric Interconnection is one of the remedies, Account separation, infrastructure sharing and on-net/off-net equalization.
*Country* *Obligations* *Ghana * • Accounting Separation • Collapse of On‐net and Off‐net Retail Tariffs. The tariff for on‐net and off-net will be the same, and subject to periodic review. • Submission of Required Details: The Commission may require the dominant operator to submit details on specific aspects of its operations from time to time as the need arises. • Asymmetric interconnect termination rate regime applies to new entrants as well as Operators with less than 5% of subscriber market share *Gabon* • Interconnection • Obligations of the quality of service, Obligation of non-discrimination transparency; • Publication of the catalog of infrastructure sharing; • Accounting separation obligation and duty on the cost accounting of all benefits *Nigeria* • Collapsed of on-net and off-net retail tariffs to discourage calling club effect; • Accounts Separation; *Mexico* • Asymmetric interconnection rates • Access to passive infrastructure • Local loop unbundling • Mandatory National roaming Access • End to SIM locking of handsets • All services sold in bundles were required to be sold separately • Certain retail prices were to be reviewed.
*Ali Hussein*
+254 770 906375 / 0713 601113
Twitter: @AliHKassim Skype: abu-jomo LinkedIn: http://ke.linkedin.com/in/alihkassim <http://ke.linkedin.com/in/alihkassim> Blog: www.alyhussein.com
"I fear the day technology will surpass human interaction. The world will have a generation of idiots". ~ Albert Einstein
Sent from my iPad
_______________________________________________ isoc mailing list isoc@lists.my.co.ke http://lists.my.co.ke/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/isoc
<image002.png>
<image004.png>
<image006.png>
<image008.png>
_______________________________________________ kictanet mailing list kictanet@lists.kictanet.or.ke https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/listinfo/kictanet
Unsubscribe or change your options at https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/options/kictanet/peterwakaba%40gmail.co...
The Kenya ICT Action Network (KICTANet) is a multi-stakeholder platform for people and institutions interested and involved in ICT policy and regulation. The network aims to act as a catalyst for reform in the ICT sector in support of the national aim of ICT enabled growth and development.
KICTANetiquette : Adhere to the same standards of acceptable behaviors online that you follow in real life: respect people's times and bandwidth, share knowledge, don't flame or abuse or personalize, respect privacy, do not spam, do not market your wares or qualifications.
Thanks Ali for sharing this. Quite informative on the status of Kenyan mobile operators. Davis Onsakia
On Feb 20, 2015, at 6:17 PM, Ali Hussein via isoc <isoc@lists.my.co.ke> wrote:
Listers An analysis on the dominance issue with case studies across the world.
1 The Kenya Information and Communications (Amendment) Act 2013 The Kenya Information and Communications (Amendment) Act 2013 (the Act) states In Section 84W (3) that Communications Authority of Kenya (the Authority) may, by notice in the Gazette, declare a person or institution to be a “dominant telecommunications service provider” for the purposes of this Act.
Section 84W (4) goes further to clarify what the Authority should consider in declaring an operator or institution dominant in subsection (4) as follow: - (a) the market share of the telecommunications service provider being at least fifty percentum of the relevant gross market segment; (b) the level of control over the communications infrastructure; (c) the level of technological advancement of the telecommunications service provider; (d) the scale of operations of the telecommunications service
The Authority further developed Supplementary Legislation cited as the Kenya Information and Communications (Fair Competition and Equality of Treatment) Regulations, 2010 “the Regulations”. The Regulations indicate in section 7(1) that the Authority shall from time to time develop and publish, in the Kenya Gazette, guidelines to be followed when determining whether a licensee in a dominant market position in a specific communications market but this is not a precondition to determining an Institution as being dominant and therefore the Authority is mandated to declare an operator dominant under the current available Primary and secondary legislation.
In regards to Dominance, the Regulations in Section 7 (2) and (3) further mentions additional criteria for deciding on dominance which include among others— (a) the degree of market concentration or the market share of the licensee, determined by reference to revenues, numbers of subscribers or volumes of sales; (b) the degree to which a licensee’s prices vary over time; (c) the ability of the licensee to maintain or erect barriers to entry to the market, including, by means of control of essential facilities, access to superior technology, privileged access to resources or capital markets or superior buying or negotiating position, amongst others; (d) the ability of the licensee to earn supernormal profits; (e) the global technology and commercial trends affecting market power; (f) the licensee’s power to make independent rate setting decisions; (g) the degree of product or service differentiation and sales promotion in the market; and (h) any other matters which the Commission may consider relevant.
Section 7 (3) A licensee shall be in a dominant market position if; (a) it has the ability to materially raise prices without suffering a commensurate loss in service demand to other licensees; (b) it has the ability to erect or benefit from barriers to market entry; (c) the Commission has so determined a dominant market power report, after considering the circumstances and criteria set in these Regulations.
In reference to the legal instruments cited above, the Authority has the mandate to declare an Institution dominant and our submission is dependent on these cited instruments to make a case for determining Safaricom as a being dominant in the Mobile Retail Voice, Data, SMS market and also in the Mobile Money Transfer markets.
2 The Relevant Market Segment
In line with best practice worldwide and also based on previous market study done by PWC in 2010 for the Authority (then CCK) it is clear and evident that the Retail Mobile Voice, Retail Mobile Data, Retail SMS and Mobile Money Transfer are relevant market segments. Our focus will therefore be on the Mobile Retail Voice, Data, SMS and Mobile Money Transfer market segments.
3 Market Dominance definition in Kenya
Market Dominance in Kenya can be determined based on the Act and the Regulations as identified above in item 2 above. Whereas globally there are other considerations known, we will use what is within the regulatory instruments available in Kenya.
However for completeness, the Competition Act Chapter 504 Part C section 23. Also defines as dominance as follows: -
Sections 23 (1) “dominant undertaking” means an undertaking which: (a) produces, supplies, distributes or otherwise controls not less than one-half of the total goods of any description which are produced, supplied or distributed in Kenya or any substantial part thereof; or
(b) provides or otherwise controls not less than one-half of the services which are rendered
This definition by the Competition Act is in harmony with the definition in the Act as it refers to half of total good s which aligns to the 50% market share specified in the Act.
Our submission will therefore concentrate on the criteria in the Act and Regulations (which are yet to be amended in line with the Act) together with the Competition Act. 4 A case for Declaring Safaricom Dominant 4.1 Degree of Market Concentration or Market Share The Commission through its consultation paper on the intention to declare regulated services, found that there was high market shares, concentration ratios and Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI) 5,230 on Subscriber base and 6,758 on revenues against best practice of 1,800 which was a clear demonstration of lack of effective Competition in the mobile voice termination market and hence the need for regulatory intervention to correct market failure. While we appreciate that the market shares, concentration ratios and HH index might have changed since the consultation was done, we strongly feel that the mobile voice market is not effectively competitive and hence the need for regulatory intervention by the Commission. The current HHI based on number of subscribers remains well over 4000 which is still double the threshold for a concentrated market.
The HHI thresholds in US and EU are defined as follows: - HHI below 1000 – a competitive market. There are no dominant competitors in this market. HHI between 1000 and 1800 – a moderately concentrated market HHI above 1800 – a concentrated market. There are one or more dominant competitors in this market.
This HHI though not reflected as a requirement to determine dominance in the Kenya goes to reinforce our submission that Safaricom is dominant.
Safaricom’s market share has remained over 63% on the basis of mobile subscribers as can be seen from Table 2 and 78 % in traffic volumes for the period of January to March 2014. In terms of revenues it is about 80%. These figures are above the threshold that would lead to a rebuttable presumption of dominance. In established competition cases and also in line with the Competition Act chapter 504 in Kenya, sustained market shares of over 50% gives rise to a rebuttable presumption of dominance, while market shares of over 40% are suggestive of possibility of dominance. On the basis of market share alone, Safaricom holds a position of Dominance in retail voice, Retail Data, SMS and Mobile Money market and should be declared dominant. As per data provided below and also slide 30 in SFC H1 ’15 presentation, SFC holds: 68%, 78%, 97% and 72% market shares in subscribers, voice minutes, SMS traffic and data users. Moreover, they control 88% of total revenues of the market. (See extracts below)
In summary, Safaricom has retained highest market shares as follows: - Market share by Subscription (voice) 80% in 2010 to 68% in 2014 Market share by Subscription (Data) 99% in 2010 to 71% in 2014 Market Share by Voice Minutes (Voice) 80% in 2012 to 79% in 2014 Market Share by number of SMS (SMS) 84% in 2012 to 96% in 2014 Market Share by Revenues (Voice) 86% in 2012 to 88% in 2014 well over 80% market share in each Mobile voice, SMS and Mobile Data
4.1.1 Market Shares by Subscriptions Number Mobile Subscriptions per Operator in Millions Month Safaricom Ltd Airtel Networks Kenya Ltd Telkom Kenya Ltd Essar Telecom (K) Ltd Totals 2009/10 16.24 1.83 0.55 1.49 20.12 2010/11 17.35 3.61 2.73 1.58 25.28 2011/12 19.01 4.91 3.12 2.66 29.70 2012/13 20.15 5.22 2.13 3.05 30.55 2013/14 21.93 5.07 2.69 2.56 32.25 Table 1: Number of mobile subscriptions since 2010 to Jun 2014 Source: Extracted from CCK/CA published reports
Market Share by Subscriptions since 2010 Month Safaricom Ltd Airtel Networks Kenya Ltd Telkom Kenya Ltd Essar Telecom (K) Ltd Totals 2009/10 80.7% 9.1% 2.7% 7.4% 100% 2010/11 68.6% 14.3% 10.8% 6.3% 100% 2011/12 64.0% 16.5% 10.5% 9.0% 100% 2012/13 65.9% 17.1% 7.0% 10.0% 100% 2013/14 68.0% 15.7% 8.3% 8.0% 100% Table 2: Market Share by mobile subscriptions since 2010 Source: Extracted from CCK/CA published reports
<image002.png> Source: Derived from Table 1 above. Chart 2: Market Share by Number of Subscriptions
Mobile Data Subscriptions by Operator Operator 2009/10 2010/11 2011/12 2012/13 2013/14 Safaricom Ltd 2,959,906 3,584,283 5,262,307 9,332,995 9,974,377 Airtel Networks Kenya Ltd 10,000 496,509 1,074,764 1,597,481 1,880,644 Telkom Kenya Ltd - 108,926 674,255 795,513 1,574,168 Essar Telecom (K) Ltd - - 644,250 614,016 501,505 Totals 2,969,906 4,189,718 7,655,576 12,340,005 13,930,694 Source: Compiled from CCK/CA published reports
Mobile Data Market Shares by Operator by Number of Subscriptions Operator 2009/10 2010/11 2011/12 2012/13 2013/14 Safaricom Ltd 99.7% 85.5% 68.7% 75.6% 71.6% Airtel Networks Kenya Ltd 0.3% 11.9% 14.0% 12.9% 13.5% Telkom Kenya Ltd 0.0% 2.6% 8.8% 6.4% 11.3% Essar Telecom (K) Ltd 0.0% 0.0% 8.4% 5.0% 3.6% Totals 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%
Mobile Data Market Share by Subscription <image004.png> Source: CA Reports Extracts
<image006.png> Source: Safaricom Half-Year Results Presentation 2014/2015
4.1.2 Market Shares by Traffic or Transactions
Mobile Traffic Volumes by Operator since 2012 in Billion Minutes Operator Year 2011/12 Year 2012/13 Year 2013/14 Safaricom Ltd 21.75 22.61 23.88 Airtel Networks Kenya Ltd 2.93 3.38 3.06 Telkom Kenya Ltd 0.21 0.38 0.92 Essar Telecom (K) Ltd 2.07 2.43 2.38 Totals 26.96 28.80 30.24 Source: Compiled from CCK/CA published reports
Mobile Voice Minutes Market Share by Operator over a three year Period Operator Year 2011/12 Year 2012/13 Year 2013/14 Safaricom Ltd 80.7% 78.5% 79.0% Airtel Networks Kenya Ltd 10.9% 11.7% 10.1% Telkom Kenya Ltd 0.8% 1.3% 3.0% Essar Telecom (K) Ltd 7.7% 8.5% 7.9% Totals 100% 100% 100%
<image008.png>
Chart 3: Market Share by Traffic Volumes in Minutes (2013/14)
The above numbers clearly supports our submission to declare Safaricom as dominant in the Retail Voice, Data and SMS market.
Mobile SMS Traffic by Mobile Operator in Millions SMS’s Operator Year 2011/12 Year 2012/13 Year 2013/14 Safaricom Ltd 3,626.14 12,386.16 23,502.51 Airtel Networks Kenya Ltd 494.01 632.10 731.61 Telkom Kenya Ltd 75.02 74.25 92.35 Essar Telecom (K) Ltd 100.21 140.58 117.55 Totals 4,295 13,233 24,444 Source: Compiled from CCK/CA published reports
SMS Market Shares by Operator by number of SMS’s Operator Year 2011/12 Year 2012/13 Year 2013/14 Safaricom Ltd 84% 94% 96% Airtel Networks Kenya Ltd 12% 5% 3% Telkom Kenya Ltd 2% 1% 0% Essar Telecom (K) Ltd 2% 1% 0% Totals 100% 100% 100% 5 Benchmarking – Case Studies 5.1 Dominance Declarations in African Countries Recently the Nigeria Communications Commission declared MTN Nigeria and Globacom dominant following a study conducted by KPMG Professional Services. MTN was declared dominant in two market segment-Mobile Voice Market and Wholesale leased lines and transmission capacity whereas Globacom (Nigeria’s second National Operator) was declared the leader in wholesale leased lines and transmission capacity market.
In its determination, Nigeria Communications Commission found that the mobile voice market was not effectively competitive and therefore ordered MTN (which has 44% of the mobile voice market) to charge same amount for on-net and off-net calls. We further wish to share with the Authority a list of countries in Africa which have declared some mobile operators dominant.
Country in Africa Name of Dominant Operator in country Market Share of Dominant Operator Year Operator declared Dominant Nigeria MTN 44% April 28, 2013 Congo B MTN Airtel 40% 38% March 2013 Niger Airtel 61.4% 2013 chad Airtel 53% 2013 Rwanda MTN 57% 2013 Burkina Faso Airtel Telmob 39.24% 38.36% 2012 Senegal Orange 62.06 % 2012 Gabon Airtel 45% 2013
We wish to highlight to the Authority that Safaricom has more market shares than most of the operators declared dominant as per the table above. We therefore request the Authority to proceed with speed to declare Safaricom dominant just like the other regulators have done in their jurisdictions.
5.2 IFT (Federal Telecommunication Institute) Mexico In early 2014 America Movil and its operating subsidiaries- Telecel (Mexico’s wireless market leader) and Telemex (the dominant fixed line player) were declared by the IFC as a dominant economic interest group in the telecommunications market. Telecel’s market share at the time stood at 69 % and Telemex’s market share stood at around 85%. The market concentration stood at 6382 points on the HHI with Mobile Market standing at 5334 point and the fixed telephony market stood at 4761 points on the HHI. According to the IFT a HHI score of more than 2000 points can affect competition. As the Authority will note the HHI scores are very much in line with the market concentration levels in Kenya. The regulator subjected them to the following regulations on the wholesale level: · Asymmetric interconnection rates · Access to passive infrastructure · Local loop unbundling · Mandatory National roaming Access
The regulator subjected them to the following regulations on the retail level:
· End to SIM locking of handsets · All services sold in bundles were required to be sold separately · Certain retail prices were to be reviewed. 5.3 Summary of obligations Imposed on Dominant Operators in other countries The following is a summary of Dominance Remedies implemented in various countries. It is important to note that Asymmetric Interconnection is one of the remedies, Account separation, infrastructure sharing and on-net/off-net equalization.
Country Obligations Ghana • Accounting Separation • Collapse of On‐net and Off‐net Retail Tariffs. The tariff for on‐net and off-net will be the same, and subject to periodic review. • Submission of Required Details: The Commission may require the dominant operator to submit details on specific aspects of its operations from time to time as the need arises. • Asymmetric interconnect termination rate regime applies to new entrants as well as Operators with less than 5% of subscriber market share Gabon • Interconnection • Obligations of the quality of service, Obligation of non-discrimination transparency; • Publication of the catalog of infrastructure sharing; • Accounting separation obligation and duty on the cost accounting of all benefits Nigeria • Collapsed of on-net and off-net retail tariffs to discourage calling club effect; • Accounts Separation; Mexico • Asymmetric interconnection rates • Access to passive infrastructure • Local loop unbundling • Mandatory National roaming Access • End to SIM locking of handsets • All services sold in bundles were required to be sold separately • Certain retail prices were to be reviewed.
Ali Hussein
+254 770 906375 / 0713 601113
Twitter: @AliHKassim Skype: abu-jomo LinkedIn: http://ke.linkedin.com/in/alihkassim Blog: www.alyhussein.com
"I fear the day technology will surpass human interaction. The world will have a generation of idiots". ~ Albert Einstein
Sent from my iPad _______________________________________________ isoc mailing list isoc@lists.my.co.ke http://lists.my.co.ke/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/isoc
Thanks its an eye opener -----Original Message----- From: "Davis Onsakia via isoc" <isoc@lists.my.co.ke> Sent: 2/21/2015 6:13 PM To: "Ali Hussein" <ali@hussein.me.ke>; "ISOC Kenya Chapter" <isoc@lists.my.co.ke> Cc: "KICTAnet ICT Policy Discussions" <kictanet@lists.kictanet.or.ke> Subject: Re: [isoc_ke] Dominance issue in the Telco sector Thanks Ali for sharing this. Quite informative on the status of Kenyan mobile operators. Davis Onsakia On Feb 20, 2015, at 6:17 PM, Ali Hussein via isoc <isoc@lists.my.co.ke> wrote: Listers An analysis on the dominance issue with case studies across the world. 1 The Kenya Information and Communications (Amendment) Act 2013 The Kenya Information and Communications (Amendment) Act 2013 (the Act) states In Section 84W (3) that Communications Authority of Kenya (the Authority) may, by notice in the Gazette, declare a person or institution to be a “dominant telecommunications service provider” for the purposes of this Act. Section 84W (4) goes further to clarify what the Authority should consider in declaring an operator or institution dominant in subsection (4) as follow: - (a) the market share of the telecommunications service provider being at least fifty percentum of the relevant gross market segment; (b) the level of control over the communications infrastructure; (c) the level of technological advancement of the telecommunications service provider; (d) the scale of operations of the telecommunications service The Authority further developed Supplementary Legislation cited as the Kenya Information and Communications (Fair Competition and Equality of Treatment) Regulations, 2010 “the Regulations”. The Regulations indicate in section 7(1) that the Authority shall from time to time develop and publish, in the Kenya Gazette, guidelines to be followed when determining whether a licensee in a dominant market position in a specific communications market but this is not a precondition to determining an Institution as being dominant and therefore the Authority is mandated to declare an operator dominant under the current available Primary and secondary legislation. In regards to Dominance, the Regulations in Section 7 (2) and (3) further mentions additional criteria for deciding on dominance which include among others— (a) the degree of market concentration or the market share of the licensee, determined by reference to revenues, numbers of subscribers or volumes of sales; (b) the degree to which a licensee’s prices vary over time; (c) the ability of the licensee to maintain or erect barriers to entry to the market, including, by means of control of essential facilities, access to superior technology, privileged access to resources or capital markets or superior buying or negotiating position, amongst others; (d) the ability of the licensee to earn supernormal profits; (e) the global technology and commercial trends affecting market power; (f) the licensee’s power to make independent rate setting decisions; (g) the degree of product or service differentiation and sales promotion in the market; and (h) any other matters which the Commission may consider relevant. Section 7 (3) A licensee shall be in a dominant market position if; (a) it has the ability to materially raise prices without suffering a commensurate loss in service demand to other licensees; (b) it has the ability to erect or benefit from barriers to market entry; (c) the Commission has so determined a dominant market power report, after considering the circumstances and criteria set in these Regulations. In reference to the legal instruments cited above, the Authority has the mandate to declare an Institution dominant and our submission is dependent on these cited instruments to make a case for determining Safaricom as a being dominant in the Mobile Retail Voice, Data, SMS market and also in the Mobile Money Transfer markets. 2 The Relevant Market Segment In line with best practice worldwide and also based on previous market study done by PWC in 2010 for the Authority (then CCK) it is clear and evident that the Retail Mobile Voice, Retail Mobile Data, Retail SMS and Mobile Money Transfer are relevant market segments. Our focus will therefore be on the Mobile Retail Voice, Data, SMS and Mobile Money Transfer market segments. 3 Market Dominance definition in Kenya Market Dominance in Kenya can be determined based on the Act and the Regulations as identified above in item 2 above. Whereas globally there are other considerations known, we will use what is within the regulatory instruments available in Kenya. However for completeness, the Competition Act Chapter 504 Part C section 23. Also defines as dominance as follows: - Sections 23 (1) “dominant undertaking” means an undertaking which: (a) produces, supplies, distributes or otherwise controls not less than one-half of the total goods of any description which are produced, supplied or distributed in Kenya or any substantial part thereof; or (b) provides or otherwise controls not less than one-half of the services which are rendered This definition by the Competition Act is in harmony with the definition in the Act as it refers to half of total good s which aligns to the 50% market share specified in the Act. Our submission will therefore concentrate on the criteria in the Act and Regulations (which are yet to be amended in line with the Act) together with the Competition Act. 4 A case for Declaring Safaricom Dominant 4.1 Degree of Market Concentration or Market Share The Commission through its consultation paper on the intention to declare regulated services, found that there was high market shares, concentration ratios and Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI) 5,230 on Subscriber base and 6,758 on revenues against best practice of 1,800 which was a clear demonstration of lack of effective Competition in the mobile voice termination market and hence the need for regulatory intervention to correct market failure. While we appreciate that the market shares, concentration ratios and HH index might have changed since the consultation was done, we strongly feel that the mobile voice market is not effectively competitive and hence the need for regulatory intervention by the Commission. The current HHI based on number of subscribers remains well over 4000 which is still double the threshold for a concentrated market. The HHI thresholds in US and EU are defined as follows: - HHI below 1000 – a competitive market. There are no dominant competitors in this market. HHI between 1000 and 1800 – a moderately concentrated market HHI above 1800 – a concentrated market. There are one or more dominant competitors in this market. This HHI though not reflected as a requirement to determine dominance in the Kenya goes to reinforce our submission that Safaricom is dominant. Safaricom’s market share has remained over 63% on the basis of mobile subscribers as can be seen from Table 2 and 78 % in traffic volumes for the period of January to March 2014. In terms of revenues it is about 80%. These figures are above the threshold that would lead to a rebuttable presumption of dominance. In established competition cases and also in line with the Competition Act chapter 504 in Kenya, sustained market shares of over 50% gives rise to a rebuttable presumption of dominance, while market shares of over 40% are suggestive of possibility of dominance. On the basis of market share alone, Safaricom holds a position of Dominance in retail voice, Retail Data, SMS and Mobile Money market and should be declared dominant. As per data provided below and also slide 30 in SFC H1 ’15 presentation, SFC holds: 68%, 78%, 97% and 72% market shares in subscribers, voice minutes, SMS traffic and data users. Moreover, they control 88% of total revenues of the market. (See extracts below) In summary, Safaricom has retained highest market shares as follows: - Market share by Subscription (voice) 80% in 2010 to 68% in 2014 Market share by Subscription (Data) 99% in 2010 to 71% in 2014 Market Share by Voice Minutes (Voice) 80% in 2012 to 79% in 2014 Market Share by number of SMS (SMS) 84% in 2012 to 96% in 2014<li class="MsoNormal" [The entire original message is not included.]
participants (6)
-
Ali Hussein -
Davis Onsakia -
Emmanuel Khisa -
Peter Wakaba -
Teddy Amani -
Walubengo J