Hi Alex, all,

.KE is a public resource and all stakeholders have to be represented.

I am keen to know which other aproach works best both for the registry and the community at large.

On Jul 19, 2013 4:45 AM, "Alex Gakuru" <gakuru@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Let's be practical, has it not ever been a mutli-steak-holders outfit? Been foolhardy to present it as multi-stakeholders to the world, yet run multi-steakholders domestically.
>
> On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 10:23 PM, Barrack Otieno <otieno.barrack@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Dear Colleagues,
>>
>> Many thanks to all those who have expressed concern over the above mentioned issue, i would like to invite all of you to submit your contributions to info@isoc.or.ke for more information please read http://www.businessdailyafrica.com/CCK-sets-standards-for-next-registrar-of-top-level-domain/-/1248928/1917976/-/q4dk0tz/-/index.html. During the Kenya IGF we will issue a common position as the Internet Society Kenya Chapter, we will relay the same to the Communications Commission of Kenya and the Government of Kenya. We will have a session during the Kenya IGF to discuss the issue and you are all welcomed on 26 July 2013 at Strathmore University Business School.
>>
>> Best Regards
>>
>> --
>> Barrack O. Otieno
>> +254721325277
>> +254-20-2498789
>> Skype: barrack.otieno
>> http://www.otienobarrack.me.ke/
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> isoc mailing list
>> isoc@lists.my.co.ke
>> http://lists.my.co.ke/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/isoc
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> isoc mailing list
> isoc@lists.my.co.ke
> http://lists.my.co.ke/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/isoc
>