Mwendwa Thanks for sharing. It does put things into perspective. Ali Hussein +254 770 906375 / 0713 601113 Twitter: @AliHKassim Skype: abu-jomo LinkedIn: http://ke.linkedin.com/in/alihkassim Blog: www.alyhussein.com "Discovery consists in seeing what everyone else has seen and thinking what no one else has thought". ~ Albert Szent-Györgyi Sent from my iPad
On Mar 23, 2015, at 4:01 PM, Mwendwa Kivuva <Kivuva@transworldafrica.com> wrote:
This is old news in the Net Neutrality debate but it still makes a good read, and is important civic education on what Net Neutrality is all about, and the consequences of lack of legislation on the same. http://www.forbes.com/sites/ewanspence/2013/01/20/why-oranges-dominance-in-a... Why Orange's Dominance in Africa Forced Google To Pay For Traffic Over The Mobile Network
During an interview on France’s BFM Business TV, CEO of France Telecom-Orange Stephane Richard talked briefly about the network’s relationship with Google, and that the American company had reached “a balance of forces” with Orange (AFP). Following on from the report, Orange confirmed to The Register that “they pay us for the traffic that they send.”
It’s not just the admission of a financial transaction that is interesting, but the influences that have led to this relationship between the two companies. Yes, it’s a net-neutrality issue again, but this time the story has confirmation of payment being from a provider of data to the carrier.
Over half the traffic on Orange’s network comes from Google’s services, bandwidth is a finite resource, and networks need to make money. Double-dipping both the consumer and the provider of data is one way of doing so. The arguments have been discussed many times before and will do again, but I wanted to highlight one moment from the discussions.
Orange have implied their strong market position in Africa provided them sufficient leverage in the discussions with Google.
The African market is currently making the switch from feature phones with limited data access, to low-cost smartphones that provide far greater access to the internet and web services. Low-cost smartphones that are predominantly powered by Android. Google wants the emerging market to be running their OS so they can effectively monetize the continent. What they don’t want is another platform becoming established, such as Nokia’s low-cost Windows Phones or the upcoming Blackberry 10 devices.
The carriers are the gateway to subsidized devices, and that puts them in a strong bargaining position.
This is a wedge moment. Google appears to have blinked and decided that Android’s market share is more important than the principles behind net neutrality. Orange is quietly letting others know they have a deal in place, and you can be sure the rest of the world’s networks are wondering how they can get their slice of the pie.
______________________ Mwendwa Kivuva, Nairobi, Kenya
"There are some men who lift the age they inhabit, till all men walk on higher ground in that lifetime." - Maxwell Anderson
On 27 February 2015 at 09:41, Ali Hussein via kictanet <kictanet@lists.kictanet.or.ke> wrote: FYI
Ali Hussein
+254 770 906375 / 0713 601113
Twitter: @AliHKassim Skype: abu-jomo LinkedIn: http://ke.linkedin.com/in/alihkassim Blog: www.alyhussein.com
"I fear the day technology will surpass human interaction. The world will have a generation of idiots". ~ Albert Einstein
Sent from my iPad
Begin forwarded message:
From: "Rashad Robinson, ColorOfChange.org" <info@colorofchange.org> Date: February 27, 2015 at 1:20:26 AM EAT To: "Ali Hussein" <ali@hussein.me.ke> Subject: BREAKING: FCC protects net neutrality! Reply-To: "Rashad Robinson, ColorOfChange.org" <info@colorofchange.org>
The FCC just voted for strong net neutrality protections! It's a huge civil rights victory, years in the making.
And it wouldn't have happened without ColorOfChange members.
Share the news and celebrate our victory:
Share on Facebook. Share on Twitter.
Dear Ali,
Big news: the FCC just voted to protect the open Internet by creating strong net neutrality protections! This is a major civil rights victory, and it wouldn’t have been possible without the voices of ColorOfChange members.
Please take a moment to share the news and celebrate our victory:
Share on Facebook. Share on Twitter. The open Internet is fueling a new civil rights movement. Without it, we might not have been able to spread the word about what happened to Mike Brown or Eric Garner. Our ability to be heard, counted, and visible in our democracy depends on net neutrality, because it allows voices and ideas to spread based on their quality — not the amount of money behind them.
Because millions of people stood up to fight for net neutrality, the FCC is now putting in place strong rules to protect net neutrality. It’s hard to overstate how big this victory is.
Net neutrality has always defined how the Internet works. Internet users and content providers pay to send and receive data at certain speeds — but in between, no one can interfere with how that information travels. It’s what makes the Internet so diverse, and so powerful.
ColorOfChange.org wouldn’t have gotten off the ground without an open Internet. We began almost ten years ago with an email to a couple thousand friends and colleagues. Our membership grew as people signed our petitions and passed them on. Our message spread to the degree that it resonated. Now, we have more than a million members, and we’ve spearheaded or contributed to many important civil rights victories.
For years, big Internet service providers like AT&T, Verizon, and Comcast have tried to destroy net neutrality, so they can make a killing by creating fast and slow lanes online. If they succeed, corporations would dominate the Internet by paying to prioritize their content online, and the voices of everyday people would be drowned out or blocked entirely.
Just a year ago, very few people thought a victory this big was possible. The telecom industry was spending millions to influence the debate, and it looked like they were winning. Sadly, they succeeded in buying the support of civil rights organizations like the NAACP, Rainbow PUSH, and National Action Network, who echoed talking points from the telecom industry rooted in trickle down economics. Some Black members of Congress joined the ISPs, after taking big campaign contributions from the telecom industry.
As we raised our voices to make it clear that net neutrality is essential for civil rights, some of those who were being paid to carry water for the telecoms told us that this wasn’t our issue, and that we couldn’t win. They said we didn't know how Washington worked; that it was a done deal; that the big telecom companies and the legacy civil rights groups with telecom money were too strong for us and our allies to face down.
What they underestimated was the power of everyday people using our voices strategically, empowered by the open Internet. ColorOfChange members worked together with members of organizations like the Center for Media Justice, the National Hispanic Media Coalition, Presente.org, Free Press, Demand Progress, Fight for the Future, CREDO Action, and MoveOn.org. Together, we stood up to big money and refused to back down, and we defied the conventional wisdom in Washington that says that money always beats people power.
With the grassroots at their back, Black members of Congress like Rep. John Lewis, Rep. Keith Ellison and Rep. Maxine Waters rallied their colleagues in the Congressional Black Caucus to support net neutrality in greater numbers than ever before. President Obama spoke out forcefully — which would have been much harder for him to do if it looked like he was acting against the wishes of the civil rights community. The president’s action changed the political calculus in Washington, giving the FCC cover to push for stronger net neutrality rules.
Now, the FCC is finally doing what supporters of net neutrality have been demanding for years. We’ll have to remain vigilant to make sure that the FCC enforces its rules aggressively, and that Congress doesn’t undermine net neutrality.
But this is a massive victory, and it belongs to all of us. It means that future generations will have the ability to continue and expand our movements for justice and equality.
Celebrate our victory by telling the story of how the voices of everyday people won against the big money of the telecom industry:
Share on Facebook. Share on Twitter. Thanks and Peace,
--Rashad, Arisha, Matt, Brandi, Dallas and the rest of the ColorOfChange team. February 26, 2015
Help support our work. ColorOfChange.org is powered by YOU—your energy and dollars. We take no money from lobbyists or large corporations that don't share our values, and our tiny staff ensures your contributions go a long way.
You can unsubscribe from this mailing list at any time.
_______________________________________________ kictanet mailing list kictanet@lists.kictanet.or.ke https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/listinfo/kictanet
Unsubscribe or change your options at https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/options/kictanet/kivuva%40transworldafr...
The Kenya ICT Action Network (KICTANet) is a multi-stakeholder platform for people and institutions interested and involved in ICT policy and regulation. The network aims to act as a catalyst for reform in the ICT sector in support of the national aim of ICT enabled growth and development.
KICTANetiquette : Adhere to the same standards of acceptable behaviors online that you follow in real life: respect people's times and bandwidth, share knowledge, don't flame or abuse or personalize, respect privacy, do not spam, do not market your wares or qualifications.