Interesting. I now get it Alex.

I missed the multi steak holder part :)

Seems like Kenic problems are more of governance than operational.

On Jul 20, 2013 7:53 AM, "Alex Gakuru" <gakuru@gmail.com> wrote:

Liz,

Further arrested development analogy:

Do you consider your Internet connectivity affordable?

If "No", know that the latest national bandwidth usage data shows that Kenyans are hardly using one-third of the available capacity. Yet the prices remain sky high and more recently "bundles" prices were actually increased.

Recall:

'President pushes for low Internet connection charges to stir growth'

http://www.nation.co.ke/News/President+pushes+for+low+internet+connection+charges/-/1056/1197234/-/11cu1wgz/-/index.html

Just as we are wasting (leaving be iddle) available capacity, could more local domain names be registered - with appropriate interventions?

Do calls for "Status quo preservation" promise the desired namespace optimal utilisation, growth and development?

Regards,

Alex

On Jul 20, 2013 7:27 AM, "Alex Gakuru" <gakuru@gmail.com> wrote:

Liz,

Your first sentence nails the answer to your second on the head.

Therefore, the question is, "Which arrangement ensures Public Interest firmly remains on the driver's seat?"

In my view, analysing the registry situation from "controlling" the resource as opposed to "optimising" its operations for maximised Public Benefit misses the whole point.

Regards,

Alex

[Sent from my tiny screen wireless device. Excuse mobile brevity and or unintended typos]

On Jul 19, 2013 8:31 AM, "Liz Orembo" <lizorembo@gmail.com> wrote:


Hi Alex, all,

.KE is a public resource and all stakeholders have to be represented.

I am keen to know which other aproach works best both for the registry and the community at large.

On Jul 19, 2013 4:45 AM, "Alex Gakuru" <gakuru@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Let's be practical, has it not ever been a mutli-steak-holders outfit? Been foolhardy to present it as multi-stakeholders to the world, yet run multi-steakholders domestically.
>
> On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 10:23 PM, Barrack Otieno <otieno.barrack@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Dear Colleagues,
>>
>> Many thanks to all those who have expressed concern over the above mentioned issue, i would like to invite all of you to submit your contributions to info@isoc.or.ke for more information please read http://www.businessdailyafrica.com/CCK-sets-standards-for-next-registrar-of-top-level-domain/-/1248928/1917976/-/q4dk0tz/-/index.html. During the Kenya IGF we will issue a common position as the Internet Society Kenya Chapter, we will relay the same to the Communications Commission of Kenya and the Government of Kenya. We will have a session during the Kenya IGF to discuss the issue and you are all welcomed on 26 July 2013 at Strathmore University Business School.
>>
>> Best Regards
>>
>> --
>> Barrack O. Otieno
>> +254721325277
>> +254-20-2498789
>> Skype: barrack.otieno
>> http://www.otienobarrack.me.ke/
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> isoc mailing list
>> isoc@orion.my.co.ke
>> http://lists.my.co.ke/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/isoc
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> isoc mailing list
> isoc@orion.my.co.ke
> http://lists.my.co.ke/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/isoc
>